Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satish vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2400/2019 Judgment decided on 16.10.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Charu Dalal, Adv. SATISH Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.C.Kundu, ASC for State with Ms. Shrestha Bhatti, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for grant of parole for 1. filing SLP. There was another ground that son of the petitioner was hospitalized. However, it is submitted that son of the petitioner has been discharged from the hospital yesterday. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no other male member to look after the son of the petitioner who is still not well.2. 3. Notice. Learned ASC for the State accepts notice. Ld. ASC submits that petitioner is involved in 13 criminal cases.4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that out of these 13 cases, the petitioner has been acquitted in 10 cases and is on bail in rest of the 03 cases...
Satish Kumar vs.sarjo Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % Reserved on:10. h October, 2019 Decided on :16. h October, 2019 + RFA9622018 & CM APPL No.49743/2018, 1365-66/2019 SATISH KUMAR ..... Appellant SARJO DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Pinaki Addy and Ms.Arpita Through : Mr.Naveen Kr Raheja, Advocate versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Singh, Advocates. YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/defendant No.1 against the judgment and preliminary decree dated 24.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-5/South-West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.369/2017.2. The brief facts that led to the passing of the impugned judgment dated 24.07.2018 are the respondent no.1/Smt.Sarjo Devi had filed Civil Suit for partition in respect of Jhuggi No.450, Indra Camp No.5, Vikas Puri, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the Vikaspuri Property) and for permanent injunction against appellant herei...
Anurag Walia vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~63 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5272/2019 Date of decision:16.10.2019 ANURAG WALIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shreyash Lalit and Mr. Aamir Choudhary, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 38281/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5272/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.77/2018 registered at Police Station Palam Airport, Delhi for the offences punishable under Section 25 Arms Act, 1959 and all proceedings emanating therefrom.4. The present petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by stating that the unfortunate incident took place within the jurisdiction of P.S. I.G.I CRL.M.C. 5272/2019 Page 1 of 4 Airport on 20.02.2018 when the petitioner was leaving from Delhi to Mumbai through flight Go Air G-8334. He was travelling with hi...
Nand Kishor Singh vs.ravi Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on:16. 10.2019 + MAC.APP. 822/2019, CM APPL. 45511/2019, CM APPL. 45512/2019 & CM APPL. 45513/2019 NAND KISHOR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarun Kumar and Mr. Anand Shankar, Advocates. versus RAVI KUMAR & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) Through: ........ RESPONDENTS 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 01.03.2014 passed by the learned MACT in DAR No.162/16. It is the appellants case that he was not served notice in the case, however, para 3 of the impugned order records as under:-"3. The DAR in respect of the above accident was filed before this tribunal on 01.02.2016 and though, R-1 &R-2 had both put in appearance in beginning of the inquiry itself, but they had failed to file on record any reply to the DAR.... 2. The present appellant is the registered owner of the offending vehicle. The learned counsel for the appellant fairly concedes that the registered owner of the...
Lokesh vs.commissioner of Police & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :16. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10943/2019 LOKESH Through Mr. Anil Singal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM. APPL452222019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10943/2019 3. The present writ petition is directed against order dated 24.09.2019 of the Central Administrative Tribunal ( the Tribunal). The order is a short order since the Tribunal has relied upon its earlier order dated 05.09.2019 passed in OA No.3198/2013, being an order in an identical matter. A copy of order dated 05.09.2019 has also been filed along W.P.(C) 10943/2019 Page 1 of 6 with this petition, although a reading of order dated 05.09.2019...
Shri Ziaullah vs.reghu Vansh Mani Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 10.2019 RC.REV. 382/2019 SHRI ZIAULLAH ........ Petitioner versus REGHU VANSH MANI SHARMA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Zubin Ms. Zubeda Begum with Ms. Sana Ansari and Mr. Singh, Advocates with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. J.Ratta with Mr. S.L. Sharma, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 382/2019 & CM APPL.28911/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 23.01.2019, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop on the ground floor of Property No.2665, Gali No.3, Beadonpura, Karol RC.REV.382/2019 Page 1 of 6 Bagh, more particularly as ...
Mannu Arora & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5262/2019 MANNU ARORA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Maldeep Sidhu, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Ajay Kohli, Mr. S.S. Sobti and Ms. Priyanka Gharawat, Advs. for R- 2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 38255/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5262/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.172/2018 dated 18.07.2018 registered at Police Station Safdarjung Enclave, South District, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.5262/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and r...
Royal Sundram General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.iti Goyal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~22 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. 10.2019 MAC.APP. 1092/2018 ROYAL SUNDRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. ..... Appellant versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ITI GOYAL & ORS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) MAC.APP. 1092/2018 & CM510442018 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 12.10.2018 passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.522/2017, on the ground that since the business of the deceased was continued by his father, there was no loss of income or dependency for the claimants.2. The aforesaid argument of the appellant is ex-facie erroneous for the simple reason that for the father of the deceased to continue the business of the deceased is an exigent temporary arrangement. The dependents of the deceased are his widow and minor children. Their dependency was on the deceased and not on his father i.e. father-in-law and grand-father of the claimants, respectively...
Bunty Buswala & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: October 16, 2019 * % + W.P.(CRL) 2284/2019 BUNTY BUSWALA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. J.S.Arya, Advocate with petitioners in person Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rameshwar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J(ORAL) 1. Quashing of FIR No.827/2015, under Sections 498A/4IPC IPC, registered at police station Subhash Place, New Delhi is sought on the ground that the matrimonial dispute stands amicably settled between the parties and petitioner No.-1/husband and respondent No.2/wife are living together happily for last two years.2. Notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice. W.P.(Crl.) 2284/2019 Page 1 of 2 3.... Petitioner No.1/ husband and respondent No.2/wife are present in the Court and they have been duly identified by Investigating Officer of this case.4. Respondent No.2, p...
Global Heritage Venture Ltd. Vs.punjab National Bank & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11283/2015 GLOBAL HERITAGE VENTURE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Ruchira Gupta, Ms.Mona Sinha and Ms.Cauveri Birbal, Advocates. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Karan Khanna with Ms.Asmita Kumar, Advocates for R1, 3 to 7. Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Advocate for R2. Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for UBI with Ms.Nazia Parveen, Advocate for UBI. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER1610.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This petition has been filed by the original borrower challenging the impugned order dated 7th September, 2015 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) in IA No.649 of 2015 (new No.4037 of 2015) filed in SA No.65 of 2012 (Delhi-2), holding that the... Petitioners aforementioned application (SA) before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) was not maintainable. W.P.(C) 11283/2015 Page 1 of 7 2. The background facts are that ...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »