Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jawahar Lal Budhiraja vs.chander Mohan Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 10.2019 RC.REV. 360/2019 & CM APPL. 27083/2019 JAWAHAR LAL BUDHIRAJA versus CHANDER MOHAN GUPTA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Kuljevan Sidharth with Ms.Kunika, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr.Naveen Kr.Goyal, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 04.01.2019 whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent has been allowed after trial and an order of eviction has been passed against the petitioner.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent with regard to one shop on the ground floor of property No.13/40, Geeta Colony, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed to eviction petition.3. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent contending that he is the owner landlord of the tenanted premises and R...
Shefali Narang vs.the State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. 10.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2342/2019 & Crl. M. A. 36151/2019 Shefali Narang ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. G. S. Narula & Mr. M. Sarwar, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF DELHI Through: Mr G.M.Farooqui, ..... Respondent APP for State alongwith SI Gulshan Yadav, EOW. Mr. S. K. Sharma and Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide this order, I shall dispose of an anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner Shefali Narang under section 438 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.149/2019 u/s. 420/406/120-B IPC.2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail on the ground that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present FIR. The petitioner is residing with her mother in a DDA Flat and has filed divorce proceedings against her husband. The husband of the petitioner is running a well reputed and prestigio...
Pavit Singh vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h October, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 3411/2017 PAVIT SINGH Through: Ms. Kanika Sood, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, SPP-CBI with Mr. P. Airan and Mr. Eric Karan Sharma, Advs. Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC-GNCTD with Ms. Shivani Vij and Ms. Dacchita Shahi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1710.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(CRL) 3411/2017 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : i. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Central Bureau of Investigation to register a complaint in respect of the facts stated in the present... Petitioner in relation to encroachment of land in the forest areas of Maidangarhi, Neb Sarai, etc. and investigate the matter thoroughly to determine the involvement of officials of W.P. (Crl) 3411/2017 Page 1 of 3 various d...
Rajiv Bajaj vs.state and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h October, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 279/2019 RAJIV BAJAJ ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shreyas Mehrotra, Adv. with petitioner in person versus STATE AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.K.K. Ghai, APP for State SI Romi Kanojia, PS Chitranjan Park CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing of FIR No.95/2017 registered at PS Chitranjan Park for the offences under Sections 420/468/471 and 34 IPC. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was the President of an erstwhile Group Housing Society known as a Bank-Mens CGHS Limited and which was to develop group housing multi storey flats at Dhirpur, Delhi. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 had booked units in the said project. As delivery of the unit could not be made due to issues in land allotment from DDA and liquidation of the said society, hence, respondent Nos.2 and 3 through their respecti...
M/S Hosmac Projects Division of Hosmac India Private Limited vs.minist ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~A-33 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 10.2019 OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 115/2019 M/S HOSMAC PROJECTS DIVISION OF HOSMAC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr.Chirag M.Shroff and Ms.Yashika versus Verma, Advocates MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ANR. ..... Judgement Debtors Through: Mr.Praveen Kumar Jain, Advocate with Dr.Yashwant Singh, Additional M.S. of R.M.L.Hospital CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) Dr.Yashwant Singh, Additional M.S., R.M.L. Hospital, is present in 1. Court pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 14.10.2019. Dr. Yashwant submits that the decretal amount amounting to Rs. 17,01,68,496.94, which includes the principal amount as well as interest accrued thereon, from the date of the Award upto 14.10.2019 will be released in favour of the petitioner by 15.01.2020.2. Learned counsel appearing for the judgment debtors further submits that an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration & C...
Sarva Chintan Foundation and Anr vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2043/2019 and CM No.9625/2019 Date of decision:17. h October, 2019 SARVA CHINTAN FOUNDATION AND ANR. Through: Ms. Radhika, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, Standing Counsel-Railway CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1710.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 2043/2019 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : (i) to quash / set aside / modify Clause 8.1 wherein... RESPONDENTS / Railways have allowed "private parties' i.e. certified by FSSAI, in Circular No.2016ArG/III/600/l/Pt dated 27.02.2007 regarding allotment of Milk and Milk Product stalls at Railway Platform falling in Northern Railways; W.P.(C) 2043/2019 Page 1 of 3 (ii) to quash/set aside the allotments on the basis of Tender No.Milk Booth/01/2019 dated 28.01.2019 (based on Clause 8.1 of Circular dated 27.02....
Mohd. Wahid & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(CRL) 2890/2019 Date of decision:17. 10.2019 MOHD. WAHID & ORS. ........ Petitioner STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Gautam Kumar, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr. Karanjeet Rai Sharma for State. SI Rajendra from PS Nangloi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (ORAL) 1. Quashing of FIR No.524/2019, under Sections 3IPC, registered at police station Nangloi, New Delhi is sought on the ground that the matrimonial dispute stands amicably settled between the parties.2. All the petitioners and Respondent No.2 are present in the Court and they have been duly identified by Investigating Officer of this case. 3 It is submitted by both the parties that the dispute between them has been amicably resolved and now they have no grievance against each other and therefore, the FIR in question and proceedings emanating there from be quashed.4. In view of the fact that both the parties have resol...
Giriraj & Anr. Vs.sheela Devi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 10.2019 RC.REV. 221/2019 GIRIRAJ & ANR versus SHEELA DEVI & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocates with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. M.P. Sharma with Mr. Alok Kachru, Mr. Rehana Alam and Mr. Deepak Kaushik, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 18.10.2018, whereby, application of the petitioner under Order I Rule 10 CPC and leave to defend application under Section 25-B Delhi Rent Control Act have been dismissed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent No.1 (Eviction... Petitioner) with regard to a shop in property bearing Municipal No.1377, Mohalla Sangatrashan, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi RC.REV.221/2019 page 1 of 3 against Smt. Bimla Devi. No leave to defend applic...
Sh. Sanjay Kumar vs.shri Anil Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 10.2019 RC.REV. 243/2019 & CM APPL. 18640/2019 SH. SANJAY KUMAR versus SHRI ANIL AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar Arya and Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocates with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Suhail Khan, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 29.10.2018 whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from Shop No.361, Chitla Gate, Chawri Bazar, Delhi (measuring 3.3 ft x 2.6 ft.), more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached with the eviction p...
Rajinder Narang vs.the State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. 10.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2346/2019 & CRL. M. A. 36175/2019 Rajinder Narang ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. G. S. Narula & Mr. M. Sarwar, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF DELHI Through: Mr G.M.Farooqui, ..... Respondent APP for State alongwith SI Gulshan Yadav, EOW. Mr. S. K. Sharma and Mr. Prayas Aneja, Advocates for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (ORAL) Vide this order, I shall dispose of an anticipatory bail % 1. application filed on behalf of the petitioner Rajinder Narang under section 438 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.149/2019 u/s. 420/406/120-B IPC.2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for an anticipatory bail on the ground that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present FIR. The son of the petitioner is running a well reputed and prestigious gym namely Olympia in Greater Bail Appl. No.2346/2019 Page no.1 Kailash-II, New Delhi for the last more th...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »