Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suresh Saini vs.manjeet Singh & Ors (M/S L and T General Insurance Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 588/2017 SURESH SAINI Decided on:18. 10.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhijit Kumar Chattopadhyay, Ms. Swati and Ms. Jyoti, Advocates. versus MANJEET SINGH & ORS (M/S L AND T GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for R-3. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 24401/2017 (delay of 84 days in filing) 1. This application seeks condonation of delay of 84 days in filing the appeal.2.3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 588/2017 4. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 29.11.2016 passed by the learned MACT in Suit No.31on the ground that the appellant, having suffered a fracture in the fifth metatarsal bone of his left foot, was incapacitated for a period of more than three months, and should MAC.APP. No.588/2017 Page 1 of 3 be duly compensated, as his business ...
Ram Charan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h October, 2019. + CRL.M.C. 5302/2019 RAM CHARAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Neelam Chaudhary & Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Rattan Singh, PS Dabri Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.367/2014 registered at P.S. Dabri under Section 354B/5IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and the respondent no.2 who is present in Court. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. The facts in brief are that the petitioner No.1 is brother-in-law (elder CRL.M.C. 5302/2019 Page 1 of 2 jeth) of respondent No.2 and petitioner No.3 is the brother-in-law (younger jeth) of respondent No.2 whereas petitioner No.2 ...
Anil Kumar Gupta & Anr. Vs.chetan Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 10.2019 RC.REV. 550/2019 & CM APPL. 41230/2019 ANIL KUMAR GUPTA & ANR CHETAN LAL versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar Arya, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 02.03.2019 whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from first floor of property bearing No.634, Gali No.14, Adarsh Mohalla, Maujpur, Delhi (consisting of two rooms, latrine, bath, kitchen, balcony, lobby), RC.REV. 550/2019 Page 1 of 6 more par...
Sunita Devi vs.bharti Axa General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 858/2018 SUNITA DEVI Decided on:17. 10.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Dahiya, Adv. versus BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P. Shahi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 22.09.2017 passed by the learned MACT in Suit No.50seeking enhancement of the compensation amount on ground that the age of the deceased being 20 years, the multiplier of 18 ought to have been applied.2. The said contention is valid. It is ordered that the multiplier of 18 shall be applied. Furthermore, compensation towards loss of future prospects has not been granted to the claimant. Therefore, in terms of the dicta of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors., (2017) 16 SCC68. It is so granted. The loss of dependency of the deceased was calculated on the basis of minimum wages applicable t...
Justice for Rights Foundation and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9358/2018 and CM No.36273/2018 JUSTICE FOR RIGHTS FOUNDATION AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh Hora, Mr. Amit K. Sharma, Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Mr. Satyam Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Bhati and Mr. Sayandeep Pahari, Advs. for R-1 and 6 Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC(Civil)- GNCTD/R-2 and 3 Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Adv. for R- 4/CPCB Mr. Biraja Mahapatra and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advs. for R-5/DPCC SI Ram Tirath, Pairvi Officer (Traffic) CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1710.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 9358/2018 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : W.P.(C) 9358/2018 Page 1 of 3 1. Ban the manufacture and sale of hazardous pressure horns, multi-toned horns, speakers/woofers, modified si...
Vikas Vasudeva and Ors vs.land & Development Officer and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~J * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :02. 09.2019 Pronounced on :17. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 3123/2016 and CM APPL. Nos. 13345/2016, 27123/2019, 27124/2019 VIKAS VASUDEVA AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Neeraj Yadav and Ms.Aditi Sharma, Advs. LAND & DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AND ORS........ RESPONDENTS versus Through Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Adv. for L& DO. Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Puja Kalra, Adv. for North MCD. Ms.Rukhmini Bobde and Mr. Nivesh Kumar, Advs. for DDA Mr.Naveen Pushkarna, Adv. for Intervener. Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv. Mr.Naveen Kumar Raheja, Adv. for HPCL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate order for quashing the allotment of land admeasuring 1080 sq.meter as shown in L&DO plan at No.1706, Shankar Road, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi by respondent No.1, namely, L&DO in favou...
Satish Kumar vs.ashok Kumar Bhalla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 10.2019 RC.REV. 333/2018 SATISH KUMAR versus ASHOK KUMAR BHALLA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tamli Wad and Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Singh with Mr. Amit Bhalla, Mr. Shreshth Anga, Mr. Surjeet S. Malhotra and Mr. Ankit Khanna, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 333/2018 & CM APPL.29182/2018 (stay), CM APPL. 23337/2019 (for directions) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 10.04.2018, whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from a shop bearing Private No.8, situate...
M/S Global Transnational Trading Fze vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h October, 2019 + LPA3412019 and CM APPL. 23391/2019 (stay) % M/S GLOBAL TRANSNATIONAL TRADING FZE Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. versus Advocate with Mr. Sriram Krishna, Mr Siddhartha Singh and Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Adv. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. for respondent No.3 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1710.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) LPA3412019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) has been preferred by the appellant (original petitioner), whose W.P. (C) No.3722/2019 has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge, vide judgment and order dated 10th April, 2019 (Annexure A-1 to the memo of this LPA), whereby it has been held by the learned Single Judge that looking to the provisions of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Concili...
Sikander & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(CRL) 2885/2019 SIKANDER & ORS. Date of decision:17. 10.2019 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Dinesh Prasad, Adv. versus ..... Respondent STATE & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr. Karanjeet Rai Sharma for State. ASI Rajender Singh from PS Nangloi JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (ORAL) 1. Quashing of FIR No.523/2019, under Sections 308/3IPC, registered at police station Nangloi, New Delhi is sought on the ground that the matrimonial dispute stands amicably settled between the parties.2. 3. Notice. Learned ASC accepts notice. All the petitioners and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and they have been duly identified by Investigating Officer of this case.4. It is submitted by both the parties that the dispute between them has been amicably resolved and now they have no grievance against each other and therefore, the FIR in question and proceedings emanating there from be quashed.5. In vi...
Mahua Moitra vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:10. 10.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:17. 10.2019 WP.Crl.2864/2019 MAHUA MOITRA STATE & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent Versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS : Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr. Adit S. Pujari, Ms. Tusharika Mattoo, Ms. Jahnvi, Mr. Chaitanya Sundriyal, Mr. Archit, Ms. Sneha, Mr. Abhinav Sekhri, Ms. Surabhi Dhar, Ms. Nikita, Advocates : Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Mr. Chaitanya Gosain and Mr. Amanpreet Singh, Advocates for State/R-1 Mr. Mudit Jain, Mr. Deepanshu Choithani, Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Mr. Yugany Sharma, Mr. Hardik Sharma, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J1 The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Sec. 482 CrPC seeking a Writ in the nature of certiorari to set aside the ex-parte order dated 25.09.2019 p...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »