Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Samarendra Beura vs.principal Secretary to His Excellency the Governor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:23. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 11310/2019 SAMARENDRA BEURA ........ Petitioner versus PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HIS EXCELLENCY THE GOVERNOR OF ODISHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: Mr. Soumyajit Pani, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. P.R. Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Sudarsh Menon with Mr. Ravindra A. Lokhande, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.46567/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.46566/2019 (seeking permission to file lengthy synopsis and list of dates) 1.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Lengthy synopsis is taken on record. W.P.(C) 11310/2019 1.... Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Governor of Odisha to obtain opini...
M/S Brijwasi Infratech Pvt. Ltd. Vs.vikas Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:9. h August, 2019 Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 M/S BRIJWASI INFRATECH PVT. LTD. CS (OS) 3171/2014 ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Mr. Dikshant Khanna, Ms. Bindita Chaturvedi & Mr. Bharat Misra, Advcoates (M- 9810160155) VIKAS JAIN versus Through: Mr. Apratim Animesh Thakur & Ms. (M- ..... Defendant Nikita Chitale, Advocates 9810817397) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.As. 7829/2019, 7830/2019, 8004/2019 in CS(OS) 3171/2014 1. The present suit for partition has been filed by M/s. Brijwasi Infratech Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter Plaintiff) against Shri Vikas Jain (hereinafter Defendant). Most of the facts are undisputed and are as under:2. The suit relates to property bearing No.3, Block-A1, Krishna Nagar, Delhi admeasuring 593.20 sq. yards (hereinafter suit property) in which 1/4th share belonged to Shri Tej Kumar Jain, who is the father of Shri Vikas Jain Defendant. The devolution ...
Harsh Aggarwal vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5484/2019 HARSH AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Singh, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS Through: ASI J.P. Sharma, PS Jagat Puri, Delhi Adv. (Appearance not given) for R-2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 39053/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5484/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.440/2015 dated 23.06.2015, registered at PS AnandVihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 5484/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and t...
Prem Kumar Aggarwal vs.serious Fraud Investigation Office
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 10.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2693/2019 PREM KUMAR AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. With Ms. Ranjana Roy, Mr. P.K.Dubey,Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr.Hitesh Rai, Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Mr. Manish Jha and Mr. Avinash Bhatia, Advs. versus SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI Through Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG, Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant and Mr. Viplav Acharya, Advs for R-1 with Mr. P.C. Maurya and Mr. Madhur Bajaj, SFIOs JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI,J (Oral) 1. Vide this order, I shall dispose of an application filed by the petitioner Prem Kumar Aggarwal seeking anticipatory bail in the Bail Appl No.2693/2019 Page 1 of 13 event of arrest in Complaint case No.770/2019, titled SFIO v. Bhushan steel Ltd. & Ors. Pending in the Court of Ms. Neelam Singh, Ld. ASJ/Special Judge (Companies Act), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi for offences under...
Sumit Kumar vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On:07. 08.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:23. 10.2019 + CRL.A. 1317/2015 AARTI STATE + CRL.A. 351/2015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Joginder Tuli, Ms.Joshini Tuli and Ms.Divya Jangid, Advocates. versus Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the ..... Respondent State. AND RISHI KUMAR BHATI STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.D.Pandey, Advocate. versus Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the ..... Respondent CRL.A. 762/2015 State. AND PARVEEN @ KALLU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.Singhal,Ms.Heena Tangi and Mr.Nitish Mittal, Advocates. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the CRL.A. 497/2015 State. AND SUMIT KUMAR ..... Appellant + + CRL.A. 1317/2015, 351/2015, 762/2015 497/2015 (All connected matters) Page 1 of 61 Through: Mr.Jaideep Malik and Kapoor, Mr.Avinash Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE ...
Dtc vs.satbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"23.10.2019 DTC + W.P.(C) 3234/2010 Through Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. Through Mr.Fidel Sebastian, Adv. versus SATBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition filed by the Management/Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) seeks to assail the Award dated 04.09.2009 passed by the learned Labour Court, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in I.D.No.76/2007. Under the impugned award the Labour Court, after holding that the punishment of stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect awarded to the respondent/workman on 30.10.2001 was illegal and unjustified, has directed the petitioner to refund the amount deducted from his salary.2. The respondent, who was working as a Fitter in DTC, was assigned the duty of checking the sufficiency of mobile oil (hereinafter referred to as oil) and other fluids in the fleet of buses operated by the petitioner. On the ni...
Gagan Kumar Singhal & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 7066/2019 GAGAN KUMAR SINGHAL & ANR Through:... Petitioners in person ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with for Jatin Teotia, Adv. Mr. respondent nos. 1 and 2 Mr. Jawahar Raja, ASC with Ms. Kritika Bhandari, Adv. for respondent nos. 3 and 4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2310.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been preferred with the following prayers:-"a. issue a direction or order or writ including writ in the nature of mandamus or such other writ, or direction as may be necessary; directing the respondents to take steps for complete prohibition of sale of infringing packages of cigarettes and other tobacco products, which do not contains statutory/mandatory health warning, in consonance with Rules of Cigarettes and other W.P. (C...
Rajesh Khanna & Anr vs.surjit Kaur Arora & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. hSeptember, 2019 Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 CM(M) 1062/2019 &CM APPLS. 31780/2019, 31781/2019, 31782/2019 RAGHUBIR SINGH ARORA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Ms. Veena Rupana, Advocates (M-9911669894) Versus RAJESH KHANNA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar & Mr. Rajiv R. Mishra, Advocate (M-9971149344) AND CM(M) 454/2019 & CAV2802019, CM APPL. 28993/2019 RAJESH KHANNA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar & Mr. Rajiv R. Mishra, Advocate Versus SURJIT KAUR ARORA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Ms. Veena Rupana, CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Advocates Prathiba M. Singh, J.CM(M) 1062/2019 JUDGMENT1 The... Petitioners/Plaintiffs -Raghubir Singh Arora and Mrs. Surjeet Kaur Arora(hereinafter, Plaintiffs) filed a suit for possession, recovery of arrears of rent, mesne profits and permanent injunction against Mr. Rajesh Khanna and CM(M) 1062/2019&CM(M) ...
Om Prakash Jatav vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 + LPA3232019 & CM Nos.22470/2019 & 22471/2019 (for stay) OM PRAKASH JATAV ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jatan Singh, Adv. with Mr.Pawan Madhukar, Adv. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Parvinder Chauhan, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Komal, Adv. for Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original :1. petitioner whose original writ petition i.e. WP(C) No.4393/2019 was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 26th April, 2019.2. Having heard counsel for both the sides and looking to the fact that the writ petition was preferred by this appellant against the show cause notice dated 8th March, 2019 issued by the respondent no.3 WP(C) No.323/2019 Page 1 of 3 which is yet to be replied by this appellant (origin...
Bibi Bulo & Ors vs.mohd Jahangir & Ors (Shriram General Insurance Co. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 838/2019 BIBI BULO & ORS Decided on:23. 10.2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Ms. Rinku Narula, Advocates. versus MOHD JAHANGIR & ORS (SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE ........ RESPONDENTS CO. LTD) Through: Mr. Abhay Singh Bhadoria and Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocates for insurance company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. Issue notice.2. The learned counsel named above accepts notice on behalf of the insurance company.3.4. At joint request, the appeal is taken up for disposal. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 20.09.2019 passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.552/2017 seeking enhancement of compensation on the following grounds: i) That the deceased was 44 years of age at the time of the motor vehicular accident, therefore multiplier of 14 ought to have MAC.APP. No.838/2019 Page 1 of 3 been applied instead of 13 in terms of the dicta of the Supreme Court in National ...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »