Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D R Bhagat vs.krishan Gopal Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 10.2019 RC.REV. 141/2017 & CM APPL. 12120/2017 D R BHAGAT versus KRISHAN GOPAL SHARMA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms. Tanmaya Mehta, Mr. Piyush Singh & Mr. Akshay Srivastava, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajat Aneja & Ms. Bhawna Pandey, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 22.11.2016 whereby the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction petition order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner from three rooms, one kitchen, one bathroom, one W.C on the ground floor, in property bearing Municipal Number 4903/XI, 89 Ansari Road, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed to the eviction petition. The contention of the respond...
Yugansh Mittal vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~113 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 11239/2019 & CM APPLs. 46292/2019, 46293/2019 Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 YUGANSH MITTAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K.C. Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Mr. Amit P. Shahi, Adv. with petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anjana Gosain, CGSC with and Kaul Ms.Aakansha Mr.Prabhudh Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2310.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL. 46293 /2019 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) 11239/2019 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: a. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction against the respondents directing set up W.P. (C) 11239/2019 Page 1 of 3 of a commission to investigate the presence of optional safety features in air...
Mukesh Kumar Srivastava vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA6682019 & CM APPLs. 45826/2019, 45827/2019 Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 MUKESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prateek Tushar Mohanty, Ms.Payal Mohanty and Mr.Tushar Ranjan Mohanty, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Mukesh Pandey and Mr. Murari Shukla, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2310.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL. 45826/2019 (for condonation of delay) 1. This Civil Miscellaneous application has been preferred by the appellant under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 60 days in preferring the appeal.2. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this application, there are reasonable grounds for condonation of delay. LPA6682019 Page 1 of 5 3. Accordingly, we hereby condone the delay of 60 days in preferring ...
Abhijeet Ghosh vs.state of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPL.1447/2019 Judgment reserved on :26. 08.2019 Date of decision :23.10.2019 ABHIJEET GHOSH ..... Appellate Through: Mr.Amit Khemka, Mr. Bhupender Singh, Mr. Kartikey Yadav, Advocates versus STATE Of NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nitin Saluja, Ms. Shivani Luthra, Advs. For complainant, Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with Inspr. Rambishan, AATS Dwarka. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The applicant who is in custody since 31.01.2018 in FIR No.717/2017, PS Dabri for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 302 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25 r/w Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 seeks the grant of regular bail vide the present bail application no.1447/2019.2. The status report submitted by the State by Inspector Ram Kishan AATS Dwarka District has stated the facts of the case to the effect that on the interveni...
Dr Nand Kishore Garg vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~114 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11320/2019 & CM APPL. 46594/2019 (Exemption) Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 DR NAND KISHORE GARG ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Adv. with Mr. Sudhi, Mr.Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Choudhary and Mr.Sarthak Mannan, Advs. Shashank Deo versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: Mr. Sanjay ........ RESPONDENTS Jain, ASG with Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for R-1 /GNCTD Mr. Atul Verma, Adv. Mr.Sanjeev Ralli, Adv. for R-2 for CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2310.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL. 46594/2019 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11320/2019 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: (a) Issue a direction in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order/direction or directions to respondent W.P. (C) 11320/2019 Page 1 of 2 No.1 for an exemption of...
Chander Pratap Singh vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 + CM (M) 1412/2019 & CM APPL. 42722-23/2019 CHANDER PRATAP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Mr. S. K. Rout, Mr. Harish Kumar and Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Advocates. (M:9971754754) versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for R-1. (M:9811394417) Ms. Shamaa Sharma, Advocate for R- 2/DMRC with Mr. Sushant Tripathi, legal assistant. (M:8178237189) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned orders dated 16th February, 2019 and 5th July, 2019 by which the evidence of the... Petitioner was closed by the Ld. Trial Court and the application for recall of the said order was also dismissed.2. The background is that the Honble Supreme Court vide order dated 21st September, 2017 had remitted the matter to the High Court, which would, thereafter, permit the pa...
Rajat Kakkar & Ors vs.krishan Gupta Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 10.2019 RC.REV. 119/2017 & CM APPL. 10054/2017 RAJAT KAKKAR & ORS ........ Petitioners versus KRISHAN GUPTA SHARMA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms. Tanmaya Mehta, Mr. Piyush Singh & Mr. Akshay Srivastava, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajat Aneja & Ms. Bhawna Pandey, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 22.11.2016 whereby the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction petition order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner from four rooms, one kitchen, one WC on the first floor and similar construction on the second floor in property bearing Municipal Number 4903/XI, 89 Ansari Road, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed to the eviction pe...
Anil Bhargav vs.the Honble Vice Chairman, Dda & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9662/2017 ANIL BHARGAV ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Pooja Kumari and Ms. Pooja Verma, Advs. versus THE HONBLE VICE CHAIRMAN, DDA & ANR Through: Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA ....Respondents Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Mukesh Pandey, Adv. for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2310.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been preferred with the following prayers:-"i. Immediately repair and carry out maintenance to preserve this Historical Monument i.e. SHEESH MAHAL situated at Shalimar Bagh; ii. Modify the order dated 14.07.2016 stopping the tenders passed by the respondent No.1 to restart the auction of Orchards on annual basis for collecting the fruits from the trees with the entry of citizen in to the Orchards; W.P. (C) 9662/2017 Page 1 of 5 iii. To make provisions for adequate ...
Legal Forum for Women Empowerment vs.goverment of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 2468/2019 LEGAL FORUM FOR WOMEN EMPOWERMENT... Petitioner Through: Ms. Payal Bahl and Mr. Athar Alam, Advs. versus GOVERMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2310.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This so-called Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been preferred with the following prayers:-"a) Writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions to the respondent Particularly Directorate of Health Services to develop offline and online mechanism for the public complaint and grievance system against the malpractice by the Private Nursing Homes and hospitals in the National Capital Territory of Delhi; b) Direction to the Directorate General of Health Services should conduct regular audits of the health services an...
Rishi Kumar Bhati vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On:07. 08.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:23. 10.2019 + CRL.A. 1317/2015 AARTI STATE + CRL.A. 351/2015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Joginder Tuli, Ms.Joshini Tuli and Ms.Divya Jangid, Advocates. versus Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the ..... Respondent State. AND RISHI KUMAR BHATI STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.D.Pandey, Advocate. versus Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the ..... Respondent CRL.A. 762/2015 State. AND PARVEEN @ KALLU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.Singhal,Ms.Heena Tangi and Mr.Nitish Mittal, Advocates. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the CRL.A. 497/2015 State. AND SUMIT KUMAR ..... Appellant + + CRL.A. 1317/2015, 351/2015, 762/2015 497/2015 (All connected matters) Page 1 of 61 Through: Mr.Jaideep Malik and Kapoor, Mr.Avinash Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE ...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »