Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Natraj Sales vs.telco Water Technology Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. 383/2011 NATRAJ SALES Date of decision:23. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner $~C-28 * % + Through: versus TELCO WATER TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishi Manchanda, Advocate for OL. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) Co. Appl. No.1110/2019 (U/S481of the Companies Act, 1956) 1. This application has been filed by the Official Liquidator under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, praying therein that the Company, Telco Water Technology Pvt. Ltd. (in Provisional Liquidation) be dissolved and the Official Liquidator be discharged as its Liquidator.2. It is stated that the Official Liquidator was appointed as the Provisional Liquidator vide order dated 04.04.2013 for the Company, Telco Water Technology Pvt. Ltd. hereinafter referred to as the Company (in CO.PET. 383/2011 Page 1 of 5 Provisional Liquidation) and the citation was published in the dail...
Akash vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1106/2018 % Judgment reserved on: September 27th, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:23. d October, 2019 AKASH ....Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur with Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates Versus State with SI Rajeshwar, PS STATE Palam Village ....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the CORAM: SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present Appeal is instituted on behalf of the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment dated 13.07.2018 and order on sentence dated 18.07.2018 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka Courts, Delhi, in Session Case No.440982/2016 in FIR No.157/2013, registered at Police Station Palam Village under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) whereby the appellant was convicted for the offenc...
Sunil Kumar Chhillar vs.b.g.s. International Public School & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~52 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 23, 2019 % W.P.(C) 7341/2013 SUNIL KUMAR CHHILLAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate. versus B.G.S. INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Pandey and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Ayushi Chaudhary, proxy counsel for Ms. Niddhi Raman, Advocate for R-2 & 3 with Ms.Tira Mishra, OSD Zone 21. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA ORDER A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) By the instant petition, the petitioner, who was employed by the respondent schoolB.G.S. International Public School in short BGS as a PGT (Chemistry) w.e.f. 24.07.2008 in the pay scale of Rs.6500-13000 but resigned, seeks the following reliefs:-"a) For payment of arrears of salary to the petitioner in view of the implementation of 6th pay commission; W.P.(C) 7341/2013 Page 1 of 5 b) For payment of salary for the months of May, June and July (08-days) 2009; c) For payment of deducted salary inspite of...
Gouri Devi Institute of Medical Science & Hospital vs.union of India & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 10.2019 + LPA6242019 & CM No.42459/2019 (for stay) GOURI DEVI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE & HOSPITAL Through: Mr.Vivek Sarin, Adv. ..... Appellant versus ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: Mr.Rajesh Gogna, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.T. Singhdev, Adv., Mr.Tarun Verma, Adv., Ms.Puja Sarkar, Adv., Mr.Arunima Pal, Adv. & Ms.Biakthansanghi Das, Adv. for R- 2/MCI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner whose writ petition i.e. WP(C) No.6898/2019, was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 30th August, 2019 (Annexure A-1 to the memo of this LPA) whereby the prayer of this appellant (original petitioner), for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 18th May, 2019 passed by the LPA No.624/2019 Page 1 of...
Maya Devi vs.mahesh Kumar and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 MAYA DEVI CS(OS) 1502/2009 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Deepak K. Vijay & Ms. Neeru Sharma, Advs. Versus MAHESH KUMAR AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pradeep Desodya, Adv. for Mr. Amandeep Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.14874/2019 (of the plaintiff for declaring the settlement dated 27th January, 2014 as void and for restoration of the suit) and IA No.14875/2019 (of the plaintiff for condonation of 365 days delay in applying therefor) 1. The counsel for the applicant / plaintiff has been heard.2. The applicant / plaintiff instituted this suit, for (i) cancellation of Gift Deed dated 17th May, 2008 in respect of property bearing No.E-1/82, Second Floor, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi executed by the applicant / plaintiff in favour of defendants no.1 and 2; (ii) declaration of the applicant / plaintiff as owner of the said property; and, (iii) restraining the defendants no....
mr.vikram Sharma & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 23, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 3012/2019 & Crl.M.A. 39104/2019 MR. VIKRAM SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. R.K. Kohli and Ms. Jyoti Kohli, Advocate alongwith petitioners in person STATE & ANR. versus Through Mr. Tanuj Bhadana, Advocate for Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for the State with SI Radha, P.S.: Delhi Cantt. ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Swati Chawla, Advocate for Respondent no.2 alognwith respondent no.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.0154/2018, under Sections 498A/4IPC, registered at police station Delhi Cantt., Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled. Respondent no.2, who is present in the court today submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever. W.P.(Crl.) 3012/2019 Page 1 of 3 2. Notice.3. Mr. Tanuj Bhadana, lear...
Lloyd Insulations (India) Ltd vs.rites Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~56 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :23. d September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10349/2019 LLOYD INSULATIONS (INDIA) LTD ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Neelam Rathore and Ms. Pooja Sharma, Advocates versus RITES LIMITED & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. G.S. Chaturvedi, Mr. Shrinkar Chaturvedi, Advocates for respondent no.1 along with Mr. Arvind Kumar, Manager, RFP, North RITES Ltd. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM. APPL427502019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10349/2019 3. Respondent no.1 invited tenders through E-tendering system for Provision of Toilets in Circulating Area of Railway Stations all over India (subject project), which were to be constructed in 16 different Railway zones across India. The estimated cost of the work was Rs.399.31 crores. The project was to be completed in 12 months from the 15t...
Novartis Ag vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~62 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 NOVARTIS AG W.P.(C) 11346/2019 Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms. Mamta Jha, Dr. Shilpa Arora, Mr. Ankit Arvind & Mr. Rohan Krishnan, Advocates (M- 9599480570) ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for R- 1 to 3 (M-8527837602) Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rajeshwari H., Mr. Sai Prasharan, Mr. Ansari, Ms. Swapnil Gauri & Mr. Tahir, Advocates for R-4 (M-9897905254) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 46770/2019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 11346/2019 & CM APPL. 46769/2019 2. The present petition has been filed by the... Petitioner as its Appeal against the order of the Patent office dated 16th August 2019, by which the patent granted to it in respect of the drug `Ceritinib was challenged before the Intellectual Property Appe...
Meja Urja Nigam pvt.ltd. Vs.ratna Infrastructure Projects .Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~A-30 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 10.2019 Through: Mr. Aman Verma, Advocate ........ Petitioner O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 422/2019 MEJA URJA NIGAM PVT.LTD. + CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH versus RATNA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS .LTD..... Respondent Through: Mr. Purvesh Buttan, Advocate JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 14849/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 422/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Parvesh Buttan, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice.3. The present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 422/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the Arbitration Clause in the Contract Agreement dated 21.09.2010 was invoked. O...
Rahil Kumar Jawa vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4682/2017 and CRL.M.A. 18647/2017 RAHIL KUMAR JAWA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Ayushi Rajput, Adv. (proxy) for Ms. Anushree Kapadia, Adv. with... Petitioners in person versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with SI Randeep Singh, PS Prashant Vihar Mr. I.J.S. Mehra and Ms. Tabbassum Firdause, Advs. with Ms. Bhawana Anand, complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.564/2016 dated 05.07.2016, registered at Police Station Prashant Vihar, Delhi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. Notice issued.3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2. CRL.M.C. 4682/2017 Page 1 of 3 4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final di...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »