Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pratap Singh & Ors. Vs.niranjan Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 565/2019 Judgment delivered on:24. 10.2019 PRATAP SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners versus NIRANJAN SINGH (DECEASED) THR LRS ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. M.K.Verma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.M.L.Bajaj, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 19.03.2019, whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act has been allowed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from shop bearing Private No.2 in property bearing No.WZ-272, Vishnu Garden- I, New Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan RC.REV. 565/2019 Page 1 of 3 annexed to the eviction...
Hamvir Singh vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
+ W.P.(CRL) 2943/2019 HAMVIR SINGH Date of decision:24. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner $~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr. Puneet Garg and Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC with Mr. Shivam Saharon and Mr. Hitesh Vali, Advocates alongwith SI Harkesh Meena, P.S.: Tilak Marg CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J( Oral) The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P.C) has been filed seeking release of the petitioner on parole for the marriage of his son which is scheduled for 08.11.2019. Status report has been handed over in Court. Same is placed on record. The fact regarding the marriage of the daughter of the petitioner has been verified by the Station House Officer, P.S.: Tilak Marg, New Delhi. Keeping in view the fact that the marriage of the son of the petitioner is scheduled for 08.1...
Baljeet Yadav & Ors vs.the State of Nct Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5524/2019 and CRL.M.A. 39205/2019 (delay) BALJEET YADAV & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anilendra Pandey, Adv. versus THE STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR Through: Mr.Tarang Shrivastava, APP for State Adv. for R-2 (appearance not given) ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 39204/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5524/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing of the Criminal Complaint No.7774/2017 registered at PS Neb Sarai for the offences punishable under Sections 467/468/4IPC.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2. CRL.M.C.5524/2019 Page 1 of 3 6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the...
Gautam @ Gesu & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 24, 2019 CRL. M.C.5430/2019 and CRL.M.A. 38859/2019 GAUTAM @ GESU & ORS STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Rajan Chaudhary, Advocate versus Through Ms. Neelam Sharam, APP for the State with SI Mahipal Singh, P.S.: Parsad Nagar ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.294/2018, under Sections 3IPC r/w Section of Arms Act, registered at police station Parsad Nagar, Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled. Respondent no.2 is present in the court today and submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever.2. Notice.3. Mr. Amit Peswani, learned counsel for the respondent/State accepts notice and submits that petitioners as well as respondent No.2/ complainant of this FIR, wh...
Swami Ramdev & Anr. Vs.facebook, Inc. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :29. h May, 2019 Date of decision :23. d October, 2019 + CS (OS) 27/2019 SWAMI RAMDEV & ANR. ...Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Mr. Rohan Ahuja, Ms. Sonali Dhir, Mr. Aadhar Nautiyal and Ms. Cauveri Birbal, Advocates (M:92051. 9664). versus FACEBOOK, INC. & ORS. .... Defendants Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Richa Srivastava, Mr. Aditya Nayar, Ms. Mishika Bajpai & Ms. Nayantara Narayan, Advocates, for D-1. Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mehtaab Singh, Mr. Prathishth Kaushal, Ms. Shruttima Ehersa & Ms. Sakshi Jhalani, Advocates for D-2&3 (M-8814048526) Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepak Gogia & Mr. Jithin M. George, Advocates for D-5 (M- 9971766556) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A. 855/2019 JUDGMENT1 The Plaintiffs Swami Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. have filed the present suit against the Defendants- Faceb...
M/S Juhie (India) Private Limited vs.reserve Bank of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9702/2019 & CM APPL. 40037/2019 (stay) Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 M/S JUHIE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Swarnendu Chatterjee, Adv. with Ms. Anmol, Adv. versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R., Adv. with Ms. Manisha Singh and Ms. Nisha Sharma, Advs. for R-1 /RBI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2310.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 9702/2019 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the grievances ventilated in this writ petition have been brought to an end by a communication dated 26th September, 2019 of the Reserve Bank of India, addressed to the petitioner. A photocopy of the said communication is tendered to this Court, which is taken on record.2. As per the aforesaid communication dated 26th September, 2019, the Reserve Bank of India has reconsidered the matter and they have...
Ritesh vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~66 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5490/2019 Date of decision:23. 10.2019 RITESH STATE & ANR CORAM: Through: Adv. (appearance not given) ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ASI Chanda Singh, PS Najafgarh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 39070/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5490/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.0185/2016 dated 05.04.2016, registered at PS Najafgarh, the offences punishable under SectionsIPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Learned APP has raised issue on locus of the petitioner. Whereas the CRL.M.C. 5490/2019 Page 1 of 3 owner of the property in question is father of the petitioner and one co- accused Chotte Lal contractor is also accused in the present case, however, the present petition is filed only on behalf of Ritesh to quash the FIR and...
Corruption Against Society (Regd.)..... Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 13315/2018 CORRUPTION AGAINST SOCIETY (REGD.)........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kaushal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. for Dubey, Adv. Devesh respondent No.1 Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Shivani Vij, Adv. for GNCTD Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Ms. Shweta Anand, Advs. for DDA Ms. P. Mehta, Adv. for Mr. Gaurang Kanta, CGSC for respondent No.5 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2310.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 13315/2018 1. This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been preferred with the following prayers:-"a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing thereby the respondents either to remove all religious structures which are built up either over government land, park or footpath and in case it is not possible to take over the charge of all W.P. (C) 13315/2018 Page ...
Alok Kumar Gupta vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 7552/2017 ALOK KUMAR GUPTA Through: None versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Khushboo Nahar, Ms. Shina Pandey and Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Advs. for respondent No.1 Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Shivani Vij, Adv. for GNCTD Ms. Rhea Verma, Adv. for DDA Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Adv. respondent No.6 Mr. Ikrant Sharma and Ms. Divya Upadhyay, Advs. for respondent No.7 for CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2310.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. When the matter is called out, nobody appears for the petitioner. Having heard counsel for the respondents and looking to the prayers in this writ petition, which reads as under:-"W.P. (C) 7552/2017 Page 1 of 8 It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ, ...
Aarti Kumari @ Menka vs.rakesh Kummar Chhabra & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA612019 & CM.APPL.13269/2019 Judgment reserved on :20.03.2019 Date of decision :23.10.2019 AARTI KUMARI @ MENKA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.B.K. Pandey & Mr. Pankaj Pandey, Advocates. versus RAKESH KUMMAR CHHABRA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. G.K. Sharma, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The respondent no.1 was present as the caveator. The appellant and the respondent no.1 have both been heard.2. The appellant vide the present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (as amended) seeks the setting aside of the order dated 22.01.2019 of the learned ADJ-02, (East District), KKD Courts, Delhi in Regular Civil Appeal No.70/2018, whereby the said Regular Civil Appeal against the impugned judgment and decree dated 24.04.2018 of the learned Trial Court in Suit No.88/2017 filed by the respondent no.1 herein as the RSA612019 Page 1 of 15 plaintiff of t...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »