Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hemant & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2997/2019 HEMANT & ORS. STATE & ANR. Date of decision: October 24, 2019 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Rajan Chaudhary, Advocate versus Through Mr. Amit Peswani, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC (Criminal) for State with SI Mahipal Singh, P.S.: Parsad Nagar Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.199/2019, under Sections 3IPC, registered at police station Parsad Nagar, Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled. Respondent no.2 is present in the court today and submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever.2. Notice.3. Mr. Amit Peswani, learned counsel for the respondent/State accepts notice and submits that petitioners as well as respondent No.2/ complainant of this FIR, who are present in ...
Mahender Behl vs.taruna Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 10.2019 RC.REV. 241/2019 & CM APPL. 18498/2019 MAHENDER BEHL TARUNA RANI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Vikram Nandrajog, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 07.12.2018, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop on ground floor of property bearing No.K-69, Krishna Nagar, Delhi - 110051, more particularly as shown in green colour in the site plan RC.REV.241/2019 Page 1 of...
State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.mukesh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 466/2019 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with Inspector Sukrampal, P.S.: Bharat Nagar. MUKESH versus Through Ms. Vagisha Kochar, Advocate. ..... Respondent Date of Decision:24. h October, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 25th February, 2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (North-West)-01, Special Court, POCSO, Rohini District Courts Delhi, arising out of FIR No.183/2016 registered with Police Station Bharat Nagar. The Trial Court framed charges under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to POCSO Act) and alternately under Section 376(2)(i) IPC read with SectionsIPC. Page 1 of 10 CRL. L.P. 466/2019 2. The Tria...
Etoos Academy Private Limited (In vol.liqn.) Vs.........
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~C-16 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 10.2019 + CO.PET. 19/2019 ETOOS ACADEMY PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN.) ........ Petitioner Through Ms. RuchiSindhwani, Sr. Standing Counsel and Ms. MeghaBharara, Advocates for OL. ........ versus ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking dissolution of the Company Etoos Academy Private Limited (in members voluntary liquidation).2. The said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 with the name Etoos Academy Private Limited on 28.07.2010 with Corporate Identity Number U80301DL2010FTC206375 with authorized share capital of Rs.38,00,00,000 (Rupees Thirty Eights Crore only) divided into 3,80,00,000 (Three Crore and Eighty Lacs) equity share of Rs. 10/- (Rupees Ten) each. CO.PET. 19/2019 Page 1 of 4 3...
Sachin vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. h October, 2019 + CRL. A. 733/2017 SACHIN Through: Mr.Arun Sharma, Advocate. ...Appellant Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr.Ravi Nayak APP for State. + CRL. A. 996/2017 SUNIL Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Ms.Shefali Vats, Advocate. ...Appellant Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Ravi Nayak APP for State. + CRL. A. 623/2017 PRABHA ...Appellant Through: Mr.Joginder Tuli, Ms.Joshini Tuli, Ms.Babita Rana, Ms.Divya Javgid and Ms.Garima Shakya, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Ravi Nayak APP for State. CRL. A. Nos. 733/2017, 996/2017 & 623/2017 Page 1 of 32 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I. S. MEHTA, J.1. Instant Criminal Appeals arise from the Judgment dated 27.05.2017 and Order on Sentence dated 02.06.2017 in SC No.2216/2016, arising from FIR No.134/2011, PS Jaitpur, New Delhi, w...
Tanya Mann vs.registrar , Guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~58 & 59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t October, 2019 Pronounced on:24. h October, 2019 + LPA5562019 and CM Nos. 38874/2019, 38876/2019, 39533/2019 TANYA MANN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Rungta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. J.S. Mann, Mr. Vipul Kr. Upadhyay, Mr. Prashant, Mr.C.S.S. Pillai, Advs. versus REGISTRAR , GURU GOVIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-1 Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC- GNCTD with Mr. Rahul Jain, Adv. for R-2 and 6 Ms. Priya Barva for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for R- 3/NDMC Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar and Mr. Atul Bharti, Advs. for R-5 Mr. R.K. Saini and Mr. Ankit Singh, Adv. for R-7 + W.P.(C) 9605/2019 RASHMI NAGIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Saini and Mr. Ankit Singh, Advs. LPA5562019 & W.P. (C) 9605/2019 Page 1 of 19 versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY THROUGH THE REGISTRAR (ADMISSIONS) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-1 Ms....
Shesh Kumar vs.taruna Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 10.2019 RC.REV. 240/2019 & CM APPL. 18477/2019 SHESH KUMAR TARUNA RANI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Vikram Nandrajog, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 07.12.2018, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop on ground floor of property bearing No.K-69, Krishna Nagar, Delhi - 110051, more particularly as shown in blue colour in the site plan RC.REV.240/2019 Page 1 of 3 ...
Sh. Ajay Sharma & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5518/2019 and CRL.M.A. 39190/2019 (Stay) SH. AJAY SHARMA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi and Ms. Priyanka Toppo and Mr. Nitin Bajaj, Advs. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State W/SI Sumedha, PS Ashok Vihar STATE & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 39191/2019 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5518/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.76/2011 dated 09.08.2011 registered at Police Station C.A.W./ Nanak Pura and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C.5518/2019 Page 1 of 2 6. T...
Janki Das Satwal vs.shashi Jain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 227/2017 & CM APPL. 40723/2018 Judgment delivered on:24. 10.2019 JANKI DAS SATWAL versus SHASHI JAIN & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advocates. with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Mr. Vikram Singh and Mr. K.K. Singh, Advocates with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 28.02.2017, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one Car Garage on the ground floor of property bearing No.5033/3, Sant Nagar, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, m...
Karmic Bioscience Private Limited Vs.........
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~C-17 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 10.2019 + CO.PET. 20/2019 KARMIC BIOSCIENCE PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mrs. Isha Khanna, Standing Counsel ........ for OL. versus ..... Respondent Through Nemo CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking dissolution of the Company Karmic Bioscience Pvt. Ltd (in members voluntary liquidation).2. The said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 on 07.05.2010 with the name KARMIC BIOSCIENCE PVT. LTD. Having Corporate Identity Number U24232DL2010PTC202384 with the authorized share capital of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lacs only) divided into 30,000 (Thirty Thousand only) equity shares of Rs.10/- (Rupees Ten) each. CO.PET. 20/2019 Page 1 of 4 3. The registered office of the company is situated within the terr...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »