Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Puro Wellness Pvt Ltd vs.tata Chemicals Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h October, 2019 Decided on:31. t October, 2019 FAO (OS) 64/2019 and CM Appl. No.15551/2019 (stay) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate and Mr. C.M. Lall, Senior Advocates with Mr. Rajat Manchanda, Advocate. PURO WELLNESS PVT LTD TATA CHEMICALS LTD versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Bani Dakhsit and Ms. Ashima CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Ghosh, Advocates. JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 15th March, 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in IA No.10934/2018 in CS(OS) No.403/2018 restraining the Appellant/Defendant from televising or publishing any commercials or any other advertising or promotional material in the print or electronic form which would result in disparagement or denigration of the Plaintiff's product/brand TATA salt including the impugned three television commercials or any modified forms thereof, the viral video, t...
Naincy Sagar vs.vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * Judgement reserved on 23.10.2019 % + W.P.(C) 10909/2019 NAINCY SAGAR Judgement pronounced on 31.10.2019 ........ Petitioner + Through : Mr. Raj Kamal, Mr. Aseem Atwal, and Mr. Kartavya Batra, Advocates versus VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Rakesh Munjal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Annirudh Sharma, and Mr. Nitisha Goyal, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Ekta Sikri, and Mr. Shashwat Sharma, Advocates for R-2. W.P.(C) 8697/2019 PRATEEK SOLANKI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Raj Kamal, Mr. Aseem Atwal, and Mr. Kartavya Batra, Advocates versus VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Rakesh Munjal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Annirudh Sharma, and Mr. Nitisha Goyal, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Anita Sahani, Advocate for R-2. W.P.(C)Nos.10909/2019 & 8697/2019 Pg.1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Preface: These are two writ petitions in ...
Mahinder Pal Singh vs.bhupinder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 10.2019 RC.REV. 604/2018 MAHINDER PAL SINGH versus BHUPINDER SINGH ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner:... Petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Rahul Kapoor, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 604/2018 & CM APPL.52640/2018 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 15.09.2018, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop bearing No.5 in property bearing No.J3/103, Rajouri Garden, New RC.REV.604/2018 Page 1 of 3 Delhi, more particularly, as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition.3. Parties were referred to m...
Sandeep vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1117/2018 SANDEEP STATE Through Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Inspector Radhey Shyam, PS Narela ATO. Reserved on :15. h October, 2019 Date of Decision:31. t October, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-convict challenging the judgment dated 21st August, 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Special Fast Track Court, Rohini, Delhi in Sessions Case No.115/2013 arising out of FIR No.337/2009 registered with Police Station Narela convicting him under Sections 201, 302, 342 and 120B IPC and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 25,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 120B, imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 50,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 120B IPC, ...
M/S Chopra Marketing Pvt. Ltd vs.m/s Drishticon Properties Pvt. Ltd. & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:04. 09.2019 Date of decision:31. 10.2019 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 213/2019 M/S CHOPRA MARKETING PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Talwar, Mr. Amulya Dhingra, Mr. Diwakar Singh and Mr. Uttakarsh Khandelwal, Advocates versus M/S DRISHTICON PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & ANR..Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ASHA MENON, J.C.M.Appln.39681/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) (COMM) 213/2019 1. This is an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The dispute relates to a property bearing No.4, Atta-ur-Rehman Lane, Under Hill Road, Rajpur Road, Delhi, measuring around 5400 square yards popularly known as Anand Bhawan.2. From the record, it is apparent that this property was subject to several transactions of different vintage, on the basis of which disputes arose FAO(OS) (COMM) 213/2019 P...
Ifrs Foundation vs.rammohan Bhave & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: October 31, 2019 CS(COMM) 891/2017 IFRS FOUNDATION ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr.Karan Kamra, Adv. versus RAMMOHAN BHAVE & ORS ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Nineesh K., Adv. for D1 to D3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) IA15511/2019 (under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC) 1. Plaintiff and defendant Nos. 1 to 3 have filed this joint application seeking disposal of the suit in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.2. Settlement agreement is taken on record and the Suit is directed to be decreed in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.3. Application stands disposed of. CS(COMM) 891/2017 1. By the present suit, the plaintiff inter alia seeks a decree of mandatory and permanent injunction directing the defendants, their partners/proprietor, servants, representatives, affiliates and agents etc from strictly observing the contractual obligations with the plaintiff and refr...
Gsk Consumer Healthcare s.a vs.eg Pharmaceuticals & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI3d September, 2019 Date of decision:31. t October, 2019 CS(COMM) 238/2019 GSK CONSUMER HEALTHCARE S.A ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Shwetasree Majumder with Ms. Tanya Varma and Ms. Eva Bishwal, Advs. Versus EG PHARMACEUTICALS & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Adv. for D-1. Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anshuman Sharma, Mr. Vivek Sarin and Ms. Sadaf Chaudhary, Advs. for D-2. Mr. Vivek Sarin, Adv. for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.6749/2019 (of the plaintiff u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC).1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit against (i) EG Pharmaceuticals; (ii) Zydus Healthcare Ltd.; and, (iii) Biochem Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from infringing the registered trade mark OTRIVIN of the plaintiff, by adopting the mark BIOTRIVIN for the same goods i.e. nasal decongestant, and thereby passing off their goods as that of the plaintiff, and for...
Gulshan Arora vs.ramesh Chander
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 10.2019 RC.REV. 422/2019 & CM APPL. 31713/2019 GULSHAN ARORA versus RAMESH CHANDER ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Abhishek Kumar and Mr. Sanyam Tandon, Advocates with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Ajay Gupta, Ms. Surbhi Gupta, Ms. Aishwary Jain and Mr. Shubham Prasad, Advocates. with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 16.03.2019 whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject petition seeking eviction of the petitioner from one shop in property bearing No.E-16/930, Tank Road, Bapa Nagar, Karol Bagh. New Delhi-l 10005 on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.3. Respondent has filed the su...
Rakesh Kumar Kwatra & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4559/2019 RAKESH KUMAR KWATRA & ORS Through: Mr. N.K. Mishra and Ms. Alka, Advs. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. Mr. Manish Bansal and Ms. Aarti Tyagi, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.26/2013 dated 23.01.2013 registered at Police Station South Rohini and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C.4559/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 23.06.2010 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioner No.1 and res...
Ashok Kumar vs.delhi Disaster Management Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2019
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11504/2019 and CM Nos.47280/2019 ASHOK KUMAR Through:... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus DELHI DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC(Civil)- GNCTD with Ms. Sukriti Ghai, Advs. for R-1 to 5 SI Talib Khan from PS Neb Sarai CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER3110.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 11504/2019 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : (i) Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction in the nature thereof to the Respondent No.l for providing shelter, food, drinking water, healthcare and other essential reliefs for rehabilitation of the victims of the fire disaster took place on 27-10-2019 on the evening of the Diwali festival in jhuggis situated at Neb Sarai, New Delhi and also to pay W.P.(C) 11504/2019 Page 1 of 3 compensatio...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »