Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 9 of about 755 results (0.021 seconds)Bhavana Bhatia vs.uday Viri
Court: Delhi
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:30. 01.2019 F.A.O.No.567/2018 & C.M. Nos.53022/2018, 3801/2019, 4440/2019 BHAVANA BHATIA ..... Appellant UDAY VIRI Through: Mr. Nishant Kumar & Pradeep Dhingra, Advocates. Versus ....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Jha, Mr. Prashant Singh & Ms. Divya Yadav, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is taken up for hearing. The impugned order dated 04.10.2018 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-03, New Delhi, Patialia House Courts, New Delhi (ADJ), in Civil Suit No.609/2018, by which the appellant/defendant on application of the respondent/plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC was directed to make the payment of the admitted amount, is the subject-matter of challenge in this appeal. FAO No.567/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. On 17.12.2018, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he is ready to deposit 100 ...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr. Vs.pushpa and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~3 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h January, 2019 3 + W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & CM APPL. 44404/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus JYOTI & ORS. 4 + W.P.(C) 11471/2018 & CM APPL. 44406/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS PUSHPA AND ORS. 8 + W.P.(C) 11475/2018 & CM APPL. 44414/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners KOMAL ..... Respondent versus W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 9 versus SAVITRI MEENA5+ W.P.(C) 11472/2018 & CM APPL. 44408/2018 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus AMIT KUMAR & ORS6+ W.P.(C) 11473/2018 & CM APPL. 44410/2018 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. versus SOURAV SHARMA AND ORS. 7 + W.P.(C) 11474/2018 & CM APPL. 44412/2018 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS .......
Tag this Judgment!Monika Hurt vs.smita Arora & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgement:30. h January, 2019 + RFA(OS).90/2018 MONIKA HURT ..... Appellant Through Mr. S. Mukerjee, Mr. R.K. Joshi and Mr. Saurabh Joshi, Advocates versus SMITA ARORA & ORS. Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 22.11.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which a suit filed by the plaintiff/appellant herein has been dismissed on the ground that there is no cause of action in favour of the plaintiff to seek a negative declaration with respect to the Will.2. In this case, the appellant/plaintiff had filed a suit seeking declaration that the Will dated 23.02.1990 executed by Late Sh. R.P. Arora in favour of his daughters Late Ms. Raksha Arora, Ms. Sneh Prabha and brother Kanwal Kishore Manchanda is null and void and is of no effect and also prayed other reliefs. The learned Single J...
Tag this Judgment!Sudhir Kapoor & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 30, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4451/2017 SUDHIR KAPOOR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Anupam Dwivedi, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Vikam S. Panwar, Mr.Vikas Walia, Mr.Naveen Kumar and Mr.Akhilesh Singh Rawat, Advs. for R2. + CRL.M.C. 477/2018 MONTO JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajesh Khanna, Advocate. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Vikam S. Panwar, Mr.Vikas and Rawat, Walia, Mr.Naveen Kumar Mr.Akhilesh Advocates for Respondent No.2 Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned petitions, the challenge is to the concurrent findings returned by the courts below regarding release of five vehicles in CRL. M.C. 4451/2017 & CRL.M.C. 477/2018 Page 1 of 3 question on superdari to the respondent-financer of the vehicles, as the case put-forth is that No Objection Certificate (NOC) of vehicles in question are...
Tag this Judgment!M/S a S Sales Corporation vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 841/2019 M/S A S SALES CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Jitender Mehta, Advocate. versus CORAM: UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Advocate for R-2 ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL380304/2019 (Exemptions) 1.2. Exemptions are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 841/2019 3. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following prayers: (a) To issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction calling for the records and proceedings of TENDER NO.2018/ IRCTC/CATG./PROC/12141-42, (b)To issue any appropriate writ or direction to the respondents to cancel the award letter dated 16.01.2019 of TENDER NO.2018/IRCTC/Catg./PROC/12141-42 and start the process of E-TENDER NO.2018/IR...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr. Vs.ms.manisha
Court: Delhi
$~3 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h January, 2019 3 + W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & CM APPL. 44404/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus JYOTI & ORS. 4 + W.P.(C) 11471/2018 & CM APPL. 44406/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS PUSHPA AND ORS. 8 + W.P.(C) 11475/2018 & CM APPL. 44414/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners KOMAL ..... Respondent versus W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 9 versus SAVITRI MEENA5+ W.P.(C) 11472/2018 & CM APPL. 44408/2018 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus AMIT KUMAR & ORS6+ W.P.(C) 11473/2018 & CM APPL. 44410/2018 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. versus SOURAV SHARMA AND ORS. 7 + W.P.(C) 11474/2018 & CM APPL. 44412/2018 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS .......
Tag this Judgment!Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs.ministry of Labour and Employment and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) No.13414/2018 & C.M. No.52245/2018 (for stay) KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Gurmeet Bindra, Adv. versus MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner/Management impugns order dated 11.05.2018 passed by the learned Labour Court whereby the petitioners right to further cross-examine the respondent no.2/workman was closed. The petitioner also impugns order dated 05.10.2018 vide which its application seeking recall of the workman for cross-examination was rejected.2. Notice of the present petition was issued by this Court on 12.12.2018. As per office report, the respondents have been duly served. However, despite passover, neither anyone appears for the respondents nor any reply to the petition has been filed. The respondents are, therefore, ...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Bir Pal and Ors vs.commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~21 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. 01.2019 W.P.(C) 6350/2016 SHRI BIR PAL AND ORS Through Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI Through Ms. Namrata Mukim, Adv. for ..... Respondent R-1/North DMC. Kumar Rajesh Standing Counsel with Ms. Punam Singh, Adv. for R-2/EDMC. Singh, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) The petitioners assail 1. the order dated 07.01.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in OA No.172/2012. They also assail the order dated 08.02.2016 passed in RA No.24/2016. Both the OA and the RA had been rejected by the Tribunal primarily on the ground of delay, laches and bar of limitation.2. The petitioners had approached the Tribunal with the prayer that the W.P.(C) 6350/2016 Page 1 of 6 respondents be directed to regularize their services on the higher posts of Electric Motor Driver (EDM), Wireman Gr.-I a...
Tag this Judgment!White Eagle Entertainment Pvt Ltd vs.outline s.r.l, Italy & Anr
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h January, 2019. CS(COMM) 1420/2016 WHITE EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. L.M. Asthana, Mr. Siddhant Asthana and Mr Peeyush ranjan, Advs. Versus OUTLINE S.R.L, ITALY & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Mohit Chadha and Ms. Sukriti CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Mago, Advs.1. The plaintiff instituted this suit for (i) permanent injunction restraining the two defendants namely (a) Outline s.r.l., Italy; and, (b) Giorgio Biffi, from indulging in sales directly with any entity based in India or appointing any other entity as distributor for the goods of the defendants in India; (ii) for recovery of damages in the sum of Rs.1,62,28,370/- with interest pendente lite and future; and, (iii) for rendition of accounts.2. The suit came up before this Court first on 19th October, 2016, when summons thereof were ordered to be issued. Though the suit was accompanied with an application for ex-p...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Rashmi Tandon vs.smt. Pramila Tandon & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 31, 2019 CRL.M.C. 512/2017 SMT RASHMI TANDON .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Vaibhav Misra and Ms. Rashmita Roy Chowdhury, Advocates Versus SMT PRAMILA TANDON & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 2260/2019 (Early hearing) By way of this application, petitioner seeks early hearing of this petition. Upon hearing, the application is allowed and the date fixed i.e. of 29th March, 2019 stands cancelled and the hearing of the main petition is advanced to today. The application is accordingly disposed of. CRL.M.C. 512/2017 The challenge in this petition is to impugned order of 22nd December, 2016 which restrains petitioner from approaching the complainant in any manner by physically being in the presence of the complainant within the distance of 20 meters, or any other place where the complainants are working as the both parties...
Tag this Judgment!