Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 7 of about 755 results (0.019 seconds)Anjali Goswami & Ors. Vs.registrar General, Delhi High Court
Court: Delhi
$~55. * + % W.P.(C.) No.963/2019 ANJALI GOSWAMI & ORS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30.01.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Prashant Manchanda with Mr. Mohit, Advs. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, DELHI HIGH COURT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The six petitioners herein have preferred this writ petition to assail some aspects of the Delhi Judicial Service Examination, 2018 in respect whereof the preliminary examination was held on 13.01.2019. It appears that the respondent establishment published a notice on 14.11.2018 whereby 50 vacancies in Delhi Judicial Service were advertised. Vide corrigendum dated 19.11.2018, the number of vacancies were upwardly revised to 147, which included the General Category vacancies as well as the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Category reserved vacancies. Horizontal reservation for persons with disabilities wa...
Tag this Judgment!Para Medical Technical Staff Welfare Association of Mcd and Anr. Vs.no ...
Court: Delhi
$~48. * + % W.P.(C) 984/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30.01.2019 PARA MEDICAL TECHNICAL STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION OF ........ Petitioner MCD AND ANR. Through: Mr. Tarun Sharma with Ms. Akansha Kapoor and Mr. Pradeep Singh, Advs. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. .... Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth with Mrs. Biji Rajesh, Mr. Aman, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.4411/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 984/2019 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 22.10.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.4311/2017. The Tribunal has rejected the said Original W.P.(C.) No.984/2019 Page 1 of 6 Application preferred by the petitioners wherein the relief sought by them was that they should be treated as covered by the Old Pension Scheme and not by ...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Kumar Tandon vs.shiv Kumar
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h January, 2019 CRL.L.P. 250/2017 SUNIL KUMAR TANDON ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Singh, SHIV KUMAR versus Advocate Represented by: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 23rd December, 2016, whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the petitioner/complainant has preferred the present leave petition.2. Facts of the present case as per the complaint are that the petitioner gave a friendly loan of 1,50,000/- to the respondent in the month of January 2010. In order to discharge the liability, respondent issued three cheques bearing numbers 046014, 046019 and 046020 dated 15th October, 2010, 15th September, 2010 and 11th October 2010 for a sum of 42,000/-, 1,00,000/ and 2,500/- respectively in favour of the petitioner. On pr...
Tag this Judgment!State vs.bhuwan Mohan
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 30, 2019 * + CRL.REV.P. 497/2018 STATE ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector Rajesh Johri, PS DIU/SHD. versus BHUWAN MOHAN Through: Mr.R.P. Luthra and Mr.Sourabh, ..... Respondent Advocates CORAM: % HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER3001.2019 Impugned order of 18th November, 2017 directs framing of charge for offences under Section 3of IPC. The impugned order is challenged by learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State on the ground that the offence committed by the respondent-accused is under Section 302 IPC and not Section 304 IPC. As per the MLC, the deceased had sustained lacerated wound on the left side of forehead measuring 2 inches X2inches and there was left periorbital hemorrhage and odema present and clots in both nostrils. It is contended that as per the post mortem report, the cause of death was compression of brain due to the injury on the ...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr. Vs.reena
Court: Delhi
$~3 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h January, 2019 3 + W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & CM APPL. 44404/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus JYOTI & ORS. 4 + W.P.(C) 11471/2018 & CM APPL. 44406/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS PUSHPA AND ORS. 8 + W.P.(C) 11475/2018 & CM APPL. 44414/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners KOMAL ..... Respondent versus W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 9 versus SAVITRI MEENA5+ W.P.(C) 11472/2018 & CM APPL. 44408/2018 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus AMIT KUMAR & ORS6+ W.P.(C) 11473/2018 & CM APPL. 44410/2018 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. versus SOURAV SHARMA AND ORS. 7 + W.P.(C) 11474/2018 & CM APPL. 44412/2018 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS .......
Tag this Judgment!National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd vs.f S Chauhan & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~57 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA602019 & CM APPL.4366/2019 NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD..... Appellant F S CHAUHAN & ORS versus Through: Ms.Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr.Sanjay Ghose, Mr.Sahil Sood, Mr.Harshul Choudhary & Mr.Viplav Acharya, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr.Abhinav Tyagi, Advocate for R2/UOI. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER3001.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by the National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (NTPC) is directed against the judgment dated 11th December 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of WP(C) 4673 of 2002 filed by Respondent No.1.2. The background facts are that Respondent No.1 joined NTPC in 1979. While working at the Badarpur Thermal Power Station he was transferred and asked to report to one Mr. G.P.Singh who was the then General LPA602019 Page 1 of 11 Manager of the National capital of power project at Dadri on 10th July 1995. Mr. G. P....
Tag this Judgment!Royale India Rail Tours Ltd. Vs.cox & Kings India Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 10.2018 Date of decision :30. 01.2019 ARB. A. (COMM.) 11/2018 ARB. A. (COMM.) 12/2018 ROYALE INDIA RAIL TOURS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhinav Vasisht, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhimanyu Mahajan, Ms.Anubha Goel, Advs. versus COX & KINGS INDIA LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Kohli, Mr.Saurabh Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Luthra, Mr.Rishi Agrawala, Mr.Karan Ms.Niyati Seth, Mr.K.V.Singh, Advs. for R-1 Mr.Joy Basu, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Saurav Agrawal, Mr.Madhav Misra, Mr.Arjun Masters, Mr.Ayush Gupta, Mr.Kanak Bose, Advs. for R- 2 Mr.Sudipto Sarkar, Sr. Adv.with Mr.Saurav Agarwal, Mr.Madhav Misra, Mr.Arjun Masters, Mr.Ayush Gupta, Mr.Kanak Bose, Advs. for R- 2 in Arb.A.(Comm.) No.12/2018 ARB. A. (COMM.) 13/2018 & IA35872018 ARB. A. (COMM.) 14/2018 & IA35902018 COX AND KINGS INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rishi Agrawala, Mr.Karan Luthra, + + + + Arb.A.(Comm.) Nos.11,12,13,14/2018 Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Naresh Kumar & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 30, 2019 CRL.M.C. 485/2019, CRL.M.A. 2098/2019 NARESH KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajit Nair, Mr. Avdesh and Ms. Ruchika, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Pushpender Pal Singh Mr. with Respondent No.2 in person. Jitender Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.29/2008, under Sections 458/452/506 of IPC registered at police station Kirti Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of second respondents affidavit of 28th January, 2019 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of this FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, Mr. M.S. Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by ...
Tag this Judgment!Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors. Vs.amit Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~3 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h January, 2019 3 + W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & CM APPL. 44404/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus JYOTI & ORS. 4 + W.P.(C) 11471/2018 & CM APPL. 44406/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS PUSHPA AND ORS. 8 + W.P.(C) 11475/2018 & CM APPL. 44414/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners KOMAL ..... Respondent versus W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 9 versus SAVITRI MEENA5+ W.P.(C) 11472/2018 & CM APPL. 44408/2018 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus AMIT KUMAR & ORS6+ W.P.(C) 11473/2018 & CM APPL. 44410/2018 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. versus SOURAV SHARMA AND ORS. 7 + W.P.(C) 11474/2018 & CM APPL. 44412/2018 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS .......
Tag this Judgment!Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr. Vs.roopam Mehta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~3 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h January, 2019 3 + W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & CM APPL. 44404/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus JYOTI & ORS. 4 + W.P.(C) 11471/2018 & CM APPL. 44406/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS PUSHPA AND ORS. 8 + W.P.(C) 11475/2018 & CM APPL. 44414/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners KOMAL ..... Respondent versus W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 9 versus SAVITRI MEENA5+ W.P.(C) 11472/2018 & CM APPL. 44408/2018 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus AMIT KUMAR & ORS6+ W.P.(C) 11473/2018 & CM APPL. 44410/2018 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. versus SOURAV SHARMA AND ORS. 7 + W.P.(C) 11474/2018 & CM APPL. 44412/2018 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS .......
Tag this Judgment!