Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited vs.drugs Controller General of India and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & CM Nos. 40515-40516/2018 UNISON PHARAMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10128/2018 & CM Nos. 39519/2018 & 44752/2018 WITH ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10711/2018 & CM Nos. 41727-41728/2018 WITH M/S EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent WITH + W.P.(C) 10756/2018 & CM Nos. 41976-41977/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 31 DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10935/2018 & CM Nos. 42603/2018 & 44753/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10966/2018 & CM Nos. 42726-42727/2018 EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ..........
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.ashok Kumar Rawat & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~12&13. * + % W.P.(C.) No.9292/2017 & C.M. No.37983, 37985/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL COPORATION ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:08. 01.2019 Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan & Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. DR. SURESH CHAND ARUN & ORS. versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal Advocate for R-1. Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Omung Gupta, Advocate for R-2. W.P.(C.) No.9298/ 2017, C.M. No.37998, 38000/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL COPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan & Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. ASHOK KUMAR RAWAT & ORS versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Shanker Raju and Mr. Nilansh Gaur, Advocates for R-2 Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA W.P.(C.) No.9292/2017 & W.P.(C.) No.9298/2017 Page 1 of 25 1. VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) North Delhi Municipal Corpo...
State vs.akram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:01. 08.2018 Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 Crl. A. No.592/ 2018 CHAND BIBI Through: Mr. Roshan Santhaila and Mr. ..... Appellants versus Chandra Suman Kumar, Advocates STATE & ANR. Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Ibad Mushtaq and Mr. Jawad Tariq, Advocates Crl. A. No.594/ 2018 STATE AKRAM Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with ..... Appellant Mr. Ashray Behura, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Ibad Mushtaq and Mr. Jawad ..... Respondent Tariq, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Crl. A. Nos. 592/2018 & 594/2018 Page 1 of 43 VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present appeals have been preferred by the complainant- mother of the victim (Crl. A No.592/ 2018) and the State (Crl A No.594/ 2018) upon grant of leave to assail the judgment dated 04.01.2017 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, (Designated Special Court Under the ...
Mohan Kukreja vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:13. h December, 2018 Judgment delivered on:08. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 662/2018 MOHAN KUKREJA ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Nina.R. Nariman with Ms. Vrinda Bhandari and Ms. Geetika Kapur, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State with SI Ram Naresh. Mr. Sushil Kumar, Project Coordinator, DDMA. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. Crl.M.A.2400/2018 documents) 662/2018 & CRL.M.A. (seeking permission 2398/2018 to (stay), file additional 1.... Petitioner impugns orders dated 09.12.2016 and 14.11.2017 of the Trial Court, whereby, the Trial Court has taken cognizance of the offence under Section 188 Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of Section 195 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C...
Dr Christo Thomas Philip vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 1775/2018 & CM Nos. 27041/2018 DR CHRISTO THOMAS PHILIP versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr Dhiraj Philip, Mr Febin Mathew, Mr Sanbha Rumnong, Ms Loreign Ovung, Mr B. Balakrishnan and Mr Jaiwan Pataanrar, Advocates. :Mr Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr Akhilesh Kumar and Mr Upendra Sai, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the order dated 01.08.2017 passed by respondent no.3 (Consulate General of India, Houston hereafter CGI) cancelling the petitioners Overseas Citizen of India Card (OCI Card). The petitioner also impugns the order dated 22.12.2017 passed by the Appellate Authority of respondent no.1 (Ministry of Home Affairs, Foreigners W.P.(C) 1775/2018...
Smt. Anusha Tewani vs.smt. Lakshmi Tewani & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2019 CS(OS) No.94/2016, IA No.2718/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC) SMT. ANUSHA TEWANI .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. B. Karunakaran, Adv. Versus SMT. LAKSHMI TEWANI & ORS. ...Defendants Through: Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Adv. for D-1 to 3. Mr. Palak Mishra & Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advs. for D-4 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 None appears for the plaintiff.2. Counsel for the defendant nos.1 to 3 states that mediation, to which the parties were referred, has failed.3. The suit, on 9th October, 2018 when the parties were referred to Mediation, was ripe for framing of issues.4. Neither the counsel for the defendant nos.1 to 3 nor the counsel for the defendant nos.4 to 6, though appear, are of any assistance.5. A perusal of the pleadings shows that the suit has been filed for partition and ancillary reliefs with respect to the following: (i) Property No.M-106, Guru Harkishan Nagar, Paschim Vihar, New D...
Hsil Limited vs.gujrat Ceramic Industries & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
$~9 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 808/2018 & I.A. 5185/2018 HSIL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Prabhshay Kaur and Mr. Sahil Garg, Advocates. versus GUJRAT CERAMIC INDUSTRIES & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: None. Date of Decision:08. h January, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral) 1. The present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark and copyright, misrepresentation, passing off, unfair competition, dilution, delivery up and damages against the defendants. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"2. a. Pass and pronounce a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their family members, dealers, their suppliers, their franchisees, agents, sister concerns or any entity incorporated by the CS (COMM) 808/2018 Page 1 of 9 their Defendant or family members, Directors, distributors or anyone acting for and on their...
Pranesh Gupta & Anr vs.jagdish Bansilal Khurana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
$~O-13 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. h January, 2019 + 1. CS(OS) 1979/2011 & I.As.3420-3422/2018, 8138/2018 PRANESH GUPTA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Bheem Sain Jain, Advocate versus JAGDISH BANSILAL KHURANA ..... Defendant Through: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Sneha Iyer, Advocates JUDGMENT (ORAL) The plaintiffs instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.9,93,27,786.68 against the defendant in which the summons were issued to the defendant on 29th August, 2011. On 08th February, 2012, Mr.Kunal Duggal, Advocate appeared on behalf of the defendant. However, defendants counsel did not appear thereafter, whereupon the Court issued fresh summons. The defendant was served by publication in Lok Satta newspaper, Mumbai edition on 02nd May, 2013. The defendant was proceeded ex parte on 18th November, 2013 and an ex parte decree was passed against the defendant on 23rd May, 2014.2. On 23rd November, 2017, the defendant filed I.A.3420/2018 under Order IX Rule 13 of...
Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & CM Nos. 40515-40516/2018 UNISON PHARAMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10128/2018 & CM Nos. 39519/2018 & 44752/2018 WITH ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10711/2018 & CM Nos. 41727-41728/2018 WITH M/S EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent WITH + W.P.(C) 10756/2018 & CM Nos. 41976-41977/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 31 DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10935/2018 & CM Nos. 42603/2018 & 44753/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10966/2018 & CM Nos. 42726-42727/2018 EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ..........
Jagtar Singh vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. 01.2019 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 228/2018 & CM APPL. 42082/2018 JAGTAR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Arun Batta, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Supreet Bimbra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 30.07.2018 by which the objections to the award filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 have been rejected. Subject matter of dispute between the parties was in relation to Agreement relating to Ordinary/Road Side/Car/Scooter/Bus/Tempo parking site at Court Market, Jama Masjid dated 05.01.2011.2. The appellant herein is primarily aggrieved by the award rendered by the Arbitrator, by which, for the period the appellant overstayed, damages at double the monthly license fee during the period of FAO (OS) (COMM) No.228/2018 Page 1 of 10 unautho...
- ‹ Prev
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- Next ›
- Last »