Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 64 of about 755 results (0.010 seconds)Hare Krishna Mishra vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 08, 2019 + BAIL APPLN. 1485/2018 1. HARE KRISHNA MISHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, Mr. Siddharth Jha, Mr. Krishna Kumar & Mr. P. Thakur, Advocates Versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Pawan Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In this petition, petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.110/2015, under Sections 409/420/467/471/477A/201/120-B IPC, registered at police station EOW, New Delhi.2. Status report filed reveals that dismissal of petitioners bail application has been already affirmed by the Supreme Court in November, 2017.3.... Petitioners counsel points out that thereafter evidence has come on record, which justifies grant of bail to petitioner-accused.4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State informs that matter is coming up before the trial court for cross-examin...
Tag this Judgment!State Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.jagesh Gupta
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:8. h January, 2019 CRL.L.P. 656/2017 STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ASI for the State with Bhupender, PS Haus Khaz versus JAGESH GUPTA Represented by: Mr. Dinesh Malik and Mr. Retesh Malik, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.No.18769/2017 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 80 days in filing the petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. Crl.L.P.No.656/2017 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 12th July, 2017, whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 279/338/427/304A IPC, the State has preferred the present leave petition.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that on 4th January, 2007 at about 2:30 P.M., on receipt of DD No.39B regarding an accident, ASI Vijay Kumar alongwith Ct. Sukhbir reached the spot i.e. IIT, Hau...
Tag this Judgment!National Highways Authority of India vs.pati -Bel (Jv)
Court: Delhi
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. 01.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 314/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through Ms. Padma Priya and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus PATI -BEL (JV) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vivek Chib, Mr. Asif Ahmed, Ms. Ruchika Goel, Ms. P. Kar, Mr. Vikramditya and Ms. Kaushal Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1 This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act) to assail the Award dated 13.04.2017. 2 The record shows that a three member Arbitral Tribunal was constituted. The petitioner i.e. National Highways Authority of India (hereafter referred to as NHAI), referred three claims to the Arbitral Tribunal. O.M.P. (COMM) 314/2017 Pg.1 of 25 2.1 The three claims referred were (i) recovery of Rs.3,54,29,325/- crores from the respondent i.e. M/s PATI-BEL (JV) (hereafter referred to as contractor) on account of balan...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.union of India ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & CM Nos. 40515-40516/2018 UNISON PHARAMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10128/2018 & CM Nos. 39519/2018 & 44752/2018 WITH ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10711/2018 & CM Nos. 41727-41728/2018 WITH M/S EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent WITH + W.P.(C) 10756/2018 & CM Nos. 41976-41977/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 31 DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10935/2018 & CM Nos. 42603/2018 & 44753/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10966/2018 & CM Nos. 42726-42727/2018 EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ..........
Tag this Judgment!Thomas Gervase & Anr vs. Ravin Mehra
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:08. h January, 2019 RC.REV. 319/2018 and CM APPL.28108/2018 THOMAS GERVASE & ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Sanjay Mishra and Mr.Nitesh Singla, Advocates. versus RAVIN MEHRA ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Rajiv Garg, Mr.K.K.Aggarwal Agrawal, Mr.Aayush and Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This revision petition is against an order dated 01.05.2018 passed by learned Senior Civil Judge-Rent Controller, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi (the learned Trial Court) in RC No.50/2017 titled as Ravin Mehra vs Thomas Gervase & Another.2. The respondent herein claiming to be an owner of the premises had instituted the petition for eviction on account of bonafide requirement under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act) in respect of MIG DDA Flat No.379, Ground Floor, Pocket R(U), Pitampura, Delhi 110034 (subject property) on the...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India vs.suresh Chander Gupta
Court: Delhi
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:22. d November, 2018 Judgment delivered on:08. h January, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 31/2012 & Crl.M.A.6948/2018 & 9445/2018 UNION OF INDIA versus SURESH CHANDER GUPTA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr. Sayandeep Pahari, Adv. Respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner Union of India seeks setting aside of order dated 14.12.2009 passed by Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate whereby the Respondent/accused herein has been acquitted of the offence punishable under section 420/468/471 IPC.2. A complaint was made by the Directorate General of Supplies and Disposals, the... Petitioner herein, against the Respondent Suresh Chand Gupta that he as Proprietor of M/s Electronics Enterprises was awarded a contract for supply of microphones manufactured by M/...
Tag this Judgment!Wadia Techno Engineering Services Ltd vs.national Highways & Infrastrc ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 5789/2018 & CM No.22544/2018 WADIA TECHNO ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD versus ........ Petitioner NATIONAL HIGHWAYS & INFRASTRCTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Ms Aakanksha Kaul. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Debal Kumar Banerji, Senior Advocate with Mr Manu Beri, Mr Varun Varma. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, impugning an order dated 06.04.2018 passed by respondent no.1 (National Highway and Infrastructural Development Corporation Ltd. hereafter NHIDCL), whereby the punitive measure of debarring the petitioner from participating in any contract or tender floated by NHIDCL for a period of two years, was confirmed. W.P.(C) 5789/2018 Page 1 of ...
Tag this Judgment!Dinesh Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~R-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. h January, 2019 CRL.A. 18/2012 DINESH KUMAR STATE versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Mr. L.K.Verma, Adv. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Subject appeal impugns judgment on conviction dated 05.12.2011 and order on sentence dated 17.12.2011 whereby the appellant has been convicted of an offence under Section 306 Indian Penal Code (IPC for short) and sentenced to undergo 5 years Rigorous Imprisonment besides payment of fine of Rs.2000/-.2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that a charge was framed against the appellant under Section 304B/498A/34 of the IPC. While the appellant stood acquitted of all the charges, the Trial Court has convicted the appellant of an offence under Section 306 IPC. Learned counsel submits that the Trial...
Tag this Judgment!Hunar Gandhi vs.university of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:8. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 86/2019 % 1. HUNAR GANDHI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Ila Haldia, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Slomita Rai, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Admissions, to the Master of Business Administration (MBA) Course in Colleges under the Delhi University (Respondent No.1 herein) are subject to passing of the Common Admission Test (commonly known as the CAT). For the academic session starting 2019, the CAT was scheduled to be held on 25th November, 2018. The petitioner, who was desirous of pursuing his MBA, applied for the CAT, 2018 which, it may be reiterated, constitutes the basis for admission to the MBA Course conducted by the Faculty of Management Studies (FMS) under the Delhi University. W.P.(C) 86/2019 Page 1 of 7 2. Applications, for registration for the MBA programme conducted by ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Adwel Advertising Service & Anr vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporati ...
Court: Delhi
$~53. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) No.3/2019 Date of decision:8. h January, 2019 M/S ADWEL ADVERTISING SERVICE & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Grover, Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj and Mr. Tarang Agarwal, Advocates. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurang Kant, Mr. Biji Rajesh and Mr. Govind Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This intra-Court appeal by M/s Adwel Advertising Service and another under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A & C Act, for short) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Court, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 impugns the order dated 19th July, 2018 passed by the learned single Judge. FAO(OS) No.3/2019 Page 1 of 14 2. The appeal is belated and delayed by 139 days. However...
Tag this Judgment!