Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Satinder Kaur Kapoor & Ors. Vs.mukesh Chopra & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:08. 01.2019 Tr. P. (C) No.227/2018 SATINDER KAUR KAPOOR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Amardeep Singh with Versus Ms.Shruti Khosla, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Gita Dhingra, Adv. MUKESH CHOPRA & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER0801.2019 1. Ms. Gita Dhingra, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. Arguments heard.2. The petitioners seek transfer of rent appeal bearing RCT No.21/2016 (earlier No.ARCT No.23/2015) titled as Mukesh Chopra & Anr. Vs. Manohar Singh Kapoor (Through LRs) from the court of learned RCT (since retired) West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi to any other learned RCT in Delhi.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that after demitting the office on attaining the age of superannuation on Tr.P.(C) No.227/2018 Page 1 of 2 31.10.2017 by Ms. Rekha Rani the learned RCT, no new incumbent has been appointed and the rent appeal of the respo...
Tag this Judgment!Raman Jain vs.magan Mala Jain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RAMAN JAIN RFA No.12/2019 8th January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sarvam Ritam Khare, Ms. Meena Sehrawan and Ms. Shweta Chaurasia, Advocates (9716023080) versus MAGAN MALA JAIN & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.284/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.283/2019 (Delay in Filing) & CM No.285/2019 (Delay in Re-filing) 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, delays in filing and re-filing are condoned, subject to just exceptions. RFA No.12/2019 Page 1 of 15 CMs stand disposed of. RFA No.12/2019 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 02.08.2018 by which the trial court has decided the preliminary issue against the appellan...
Tag this Judgment!Hsil Limited vs.sanjay Ceramic Works & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
$~10 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 882/2018 & I.A. 6822/2018 HSIL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Prabhshay Kaur and Mr. Sahil Garg, Advocates. versus SANJAY CERAMIC WORKS & ANR. Through: None. ..... Defendants Date of Decision:08. h January, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral) 1. The present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark and copyright, misrepresentation, passing off, unfair competition, dilution, delivery up and damages against the defendants.2. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"a. Pass and pronounce a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their family members, dealers, their suppliers, their franchisees, agents, sister concerns or any entity incorporated by the Defendant or their family members, Directors, distributors or anyone acting for and CS (COMM) 882/2018 Page 1 of 8 on their beha...
Tag this Judgment!Chand Bibi vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:01. 08.2018 Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 Crl. A. No.592/ 2018 CHAND BIBI Through: Mr. Roshan Santhaila and Mr. ..... Appellants versus Chandra Suman Kumar, Advocates STATE & ANR. Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Ibad Mushtaq and Mr. Jawad Tariq, Advocates Crl. A. No.594/ 2018 STATE AKRAM Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with ..... Appellant Mr. Ashray Behura, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Ibad Mushtaq and Mr. Jawad ..... Respondent Tariq, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Crl. A. Nos. 592/2018 & 594/2018 Page 1 of 43 VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present appeals have been preferred by the complainant- mother of the victim (Crl. A No.592/ 2018) and the State (Crl A No.594/ 2018) upon grant of leave to assail the judgment dated 04.01.2017 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, (Designated Special Court Under the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court on Its Own Motion vs.deepak Malik Inspector
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
#4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:8. h January, 2019 CONT.CAS.(CRL) 18/2018 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner DEEPAK MALIK INSPECTOR ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Jaideep Malik, Mr. Rakesh Chahar, Mr. Sumit Chaudhary, Mr. Arun Rathi and Mr. Avinash Kapoor, Advocates along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present criminal contempt is predicated on a reference dated 20th October, 2018, made by Ms. Ekta Gauba, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North West), Rohini Courts, Delhi. CONT.CAS.(CRL) 18/2018 Page 1 of 6 2. The gravamen of the charge against Inspector Deepak Malik, Police Station Maurya Enclave is that, he surreptitiously made video recordings of the Court proceedings on 20th October, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as the subject video record...
Tag this Judgment!Gurmeet Singh Grewal & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10201/2015 GURMEET SINGH GREWAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.P. Bhargava, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Chiranjeev Kumar, Advocate Sachdeva, with Mr. Mukesh Advocate for Respondent No.1/UOI. Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for LAC/L&B Ms. Mrinalini Sen, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER0801.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayer in the present petition reads as under: (i) issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other writ, order or direction of the similar nature declaring the entire acquisition with respect to 5 Bighas 4 Biswas of land comprised in Mustatil No.14, Khasra No.21 min (2-12) and Khasra No.21 min (2-12), situated in revenue Estate of Village Deoli, Tehsil Mehrauli, NCT'OF Delhi also described as property No.F-130, W5A/20, Western Avenue, Sainik Farm, New Delhi, having lapsed and further quashing the impugned notification ...
Tag this Judgment!Ms Shikha Gupta vs.state (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:22. d November, 2018 Judgment delivered on:08. h January, 2019 + CRL. REV. P. 330/2017 MS SHIKHA GUPTA versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Lohit Ganguly, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ....Respondent For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State with SI Dev Kumar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL. REV. P. 330/2017 & Crl.M.A.7381/2017 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order on charge dated 15.03.2017, whereby, the Trial Court has held that prima facie material exists against the accused for framing of charge under Section 306 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short).2.... Petitioner was the wife of the deceased. They were married according to Hindu rights and ceremonies on 25.02.2015. From the wedlock, a female baby has been born, which is in the custody of the CRL. REV. P. 330/2017 Page 1 of 16 petitioner. D...
Tag this Judgment!M/S East West Pharma vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & CM Nos. 40515-40516/2018 UNISON PHARAMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10128/2018 & CM Nos. 39519/2018 & 44752/2018 WITH ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10711/2018 & CM Nos. 41727-41728/2018 WITH M/S EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent WITH + W.P.(C) 10756/2018 & CM Nos. 41976-41977/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 31 DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10935/2018 & CM Nos. 42603/2018 & 44753/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10966/2018 & CM Nos. 42726-42727/2018 EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ..........
Tag this Judgment!Avinash Bharti vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2015/2018 & CM APPL. 8288/2018 AVINASH BHARTI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr S. Chakraborty, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms Anjana Gosain, Ms Prabiya Thakur, Mr Shalim Nair, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0801.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is an Aircraft Maintenance Engineer and the Central Government had granted him a licence being AME Licence No.6745 (A&C) issued in terms of Rule 61 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 (hereafter the Rules).2. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the order dated 27.09.2016 passed by the Director of Airworthiness from the Office of the Director General of Civil Aviation (hereafter DGCA). In terms of the said order, the petitioners AME Licence was suspended for a period of five years and his acceptance to hold the post of Base Maintenance Manager was withdrawn. The petitioners appeal under Rule 3B of the Rules, ...
Tag this Judgment!North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dr. Suresh Chand Arun & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~12&13. * + % W.P.(C.) No.9292/2017 & C.M. No.37983, 37985/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL COPORATION ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:08. 01.2019 Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan & Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. DR. SURESH CHAND ARUN & ORS. versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal Advocate for R-1. Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Omung Gupta, Advocate for R-2. W.P.(C.) No.9298/ 2017, C.M. No.37998, 38000/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL COPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan & Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. ASHOK KUMAR RAWAT & ORS versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Shanker Raju and Mr. Nilansh Gaur, Advocates for R-2 Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA W.P.(C.) No.9292/2017 & W.P.(C.) No.9298/2017 Page 1 of 25 1. VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) North Delhi Municipal Corpo...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next ›
- Last »