Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 62 of about 755 results (0.017 seconds)Union of India & Ors. Vs.raman Kishore
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~11 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 09, 2019 W.P.(C) 1261/2016 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus RAMAN KISHORE ..... Respondent Through Mr. M.S. Saini, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Union of India has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 20.07.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT) in OA No.3059/2013. The said OA had been preferred by the respondent to assail the 2. disciplinary proceedings initiated against him, which culminated into imposition of penalty of removal from service upon him. The respondent also assailed the order rejecting his appeal thereagainst. The respondent was charge-sheeted vide memorandum dated 3. 22.02.2010 under Rule 9 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. The Article of Charge framed against him, and the ...
Tag this Judgment!Sh Somendra Khosla vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 09, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3982/2017 & CRL.M.A. 16054/2017 CRL.M.C. 4091/2017 & CRL.M.A. 16421/2017 CRL.M.C. 4200/2017 & CRL.M.As. 16854-55/2017 CRL.M.C. 4226/2017 & CRL.M.As. 16943-44/2017 SH SOMENDRA KHOSLA N SRINIVASA RAO .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikas Gupta and Mr. Vipin Kalra, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh and Mr. M.S.Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutors for respondent- State Mr. Satinder Singh Mathur, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The above captioned four petitions are directed against criminal 1. complaint titled JBB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. MIC Electronics Limited and Ors, filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, in which petitioners have been summoned as an accused. Quashing of aforesaid complaints and the summoning order of 16th 2. August, 2016 is sought on the ground that petitioners a...
Tag this Judgment!Republic of India Through: Ministry of Defence vs.m/s Agusta Westland ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~18 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h January, 2019 REPUBLIC OF INDIA THROUGH: MINISTRY OF DEFENCE CS(COMM) 9/2019 ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG with Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Mr. Joel, Ms. Kritika Sachdeva, Advocates (M-9810003146) M/S AGUSTA WESTLAND INTERNATIONAL LTD. versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anand Prasad, Mr. Ashok Bhan, Mr. Mohit Rohatgi & Ms. Swati Advocates (M-9971997784) Narnulia, CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 230/2019 (for exemption) 1. This is an application seeking exemption from filing original/certified copies of documents. Recording the Plaintiffs undertaking that the inspection of original documents shall be given, if demanded, or that the original documents/certified copies shall be filed prior to the stage of admission/denial, the exemption is allowed. I.A. is disposed of. I.A. 231/2019 (for exemption) 2. This is an appli...
Tag this Judgment!Yogesh Chandra Goyal & Anr. Vs.kamlesh Kumar Goel & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~8 & 9 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"9 January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4003/2016 and Crl.M.A.16758/2016 + YOGESH CHANDRA GOYAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Purvesh Buttan, Advocate with Mr. Fahad Imtiaz, Advocate KAMLESH KUMAR GOEL & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate with Mr. Sambit Nanda, & Mr. Akshit Kapur, Advocates CRL.M.C. 4013/2016 and Crl.M.A.16790-16791/2016 YOGESH CHANDRA GOYAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Purvesh Buttan, Advocate with Mr. Fahad Imtiaz, Advocate versus M/S GLORY APARTMENT PVT LTD & ORS....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate with Mr. Sambit Nanda, & Mr. Akshit Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioners had instituted criminal complaint (No.14of 2012) alleging offences punishable under Sections 630 of the Crl. M.C. No.4003/2016 & 4013/2016 Page 1 of 14 Companies Act, 1956 and Sections 406/408/441 of Indian Penal Code,...
Tag this Judgment!Govind Kumar Srivastava vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10026/2016 GOVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Pallavi Aswasthi, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suparna Srivastava and Ms. Sanjna Dua, Advocates for R-1 to R-5. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0901.2019 1. As far as the preliminary objection of the... RESPONDENTS to the maintainability of the present petition is concerned, the learned counsel for the... Petitioner has placed before the Court an order dated 31st July 2018 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) Principal Bench which inter alia holds that the challenge to the circulars cannot be entertained by the AFT in terms of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2017 (AFT Act) as it does not give power of issuance of writ to the AFT.2. Counsel for the... RESPONDENTS, on the other hand, relied upon the judgment in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) 3 SC...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Aruna Mishra vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4248/2017 and CM Nos. 18539, 18540, 25185/2017, 986, 8369, 12633, 15361, 26784, 33993/2018 % 1. DR. ARUNA MISHRA Through:... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, Sr.Panel Counsel for R-1/UOI Mr. Rajneesh Bhaskaran, Govt. Panel Counsel and Mr. Uttam Kumar, Adv. for R-2 Mr. S.D. Singh and Mr. Rahul Kr. Singh, Adv. for R-3 Ms. Anuja Saxena, Adv. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences (Respondent No.3 herein and referred to, hereinafter, as IHBAS) issued an Admission Notification, inviting applications for admission to the M.Phil. Clinical Psychology Course, for the session 2016-2018, conducted under the aegis of the University of Delhi. The W.P.(C) 4248/2017 Page 1 of 13 number of seats advertised were mentioned, in the said notification, t...
Tag this Judgment!Rajinder Pershad Goel vs.gian Chand Goel & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2477/2014 & I.As. 3875/2018 & 14487/2018 RAJINDER PERSHAD GOEL ..... Plaintiff Date of decision:9. h January, 2019 Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar and Ms. Sneha P-1 for Upadhay, Advocates (M-9810680082) Mr. Rajesh Rai & Mr. Rishi Kumar, Advocates for P-2 (M-9718844435) versus GIAN CHAND GOEL & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Parul Agarwal, Advocate for D-2 (M-9873416566) along with D-2 present in person. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for D-4&5 (M-9810962950). Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Advocate for D-7. Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate for D-8 (M-9810702410). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present suit is for partition, declaration, rendition of accounts and 1. consequential relief of permanent injunction. Counsel for the Plaintiff No.1 - Mr. Arvind Kumar submits under instructions from his client who is present in Court that his client does not wish to press reliefs (b) to (f) and only prays for decree in te...
Tag this Judgment!Mic Electronics Ltd & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 09, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3986/2017, CRL.M.A. 16082/2017 CRL.M.C. 4146/2017, CRL.M.A. 16657/2017 CRL.M.C. 4151/2017, CRL.M.A. 16674/2017 CRL.M.C. 5243/2017 MIC ELECTRONICS LTD & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikas Gupta and Mr. Vipin Kalra, Advocates versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Sarul Jain, Advocate for Respondent No.2 in CRL.M.C. 4146/2017 & in CRL.M.C. 5243/2017 Mr. Satinder Singh Mathur, Advocate for Respondent No.2 in CRL.M.C. 3986/2017 and CRL.M.C. 4151/2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Amended memo of parties of 9th January, 2019 has been filed in Crl.M.C. 4146/2017 in the Court and is taken on record. CRL.M.C. 3986/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 4 With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above captioned four petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. In th...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak Shamsher Thapa vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t July, 2018 Pronounced on:8. h January, 2019 + CRL.A. 831/2014 % 1. DEEPAK SHAMSHER THAPA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Yogesh Saxena, Mr. Sikander Azam Khan and Mr. Aditya Vikram (DLSA), Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP STATE for the State ASI Yasin Khan, PS Crime Branch in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT This appeal assails judgment, dated 13th May, 2014, whereby the learned Special Judge (NDPS-02) convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 20(C) of the Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act), as well as the consequent order, dated 24th May, 2014, whereby the learned Special Judge sentenced the appellant, for the said offence, to undergo 12 years rigourous imprisonment with fine of 1 lakh, and default simple imprisonment of 6 months. CRL.A. 831/2014 Page 1 of 10 2. The case of the prosecu...
Tag this Judgment!Charanjeet Singh & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors,
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2019
% + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. h January, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2364/2018 CHARANJEET SINGH & ANR STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS Versus ..Petitioners Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Kuldeep Mansukhani, Adv. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for theState with SI Davender Singh CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICESANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 14.12.2017 whereby the revisional court had allowed the revision petition filed by the respondent nos. 2 and 3 impugning order on charge of the Trial Court dated 07.09.2013 and discharged respondent nos. 2 and 3 of the charges which were framed against them by the Trial Court for the offences under Section 420/120-B of the IPC.2.... Petitionersare the complainants and, on their complaint, FIR No.156/2003 at Police Station Kotla Mubarakpur had been registered. Crl.M.C.2364/2018 Page 1 of 13 3.... Petitioners and the respon...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- Next ›
- Last »