Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Versatile Commotrade Private Limited vs.rattan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h January, 2019. CS(COMM) 982/2016 & IA No.15264/2017 (of defendant u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Aman Prasad and Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Advs. BALRAJ Versus Through: Mr. Kuldeep Sehrawat, Adv. ..... Defendant AND CS(COMM) 983/2016 & IA No.15267/2017 (of defendant u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Aman Prasad and Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Advs. Versus RATTAN SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: Mr. Kuldeep Sehrawat, Adv. ..... Defendant Both suits, under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), are ripe for hearing arguments on the applications of the defendant therein for leave to defend.2. When the suits are called out, none appears for the plaintiff in the suits; the counsel for the defendant in both the suits states that no reply to the applications for leave to defend...
Tag this Judgment!Suhail Khan vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 09, 2019 Crl.M.C. 1124/2018 & Crl.M.A. 4043/2018 SUHAIL KHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Jain & Ms. Ayushi Sharma, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State Mr. Rajeev Khosla & Ms. H.S.Sodi, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Received on transfer. In execution proceedings pertaining to arrears of interim maintenance and rent, concurrent finding returned by the courts below are that petitioners plea of adjustment of `8,50,000/- cannot be gone into, as the executing court cannot go beyond the judgment of 2nd June, 2017.... Petitioners counsel relies upon Agreement of 11th October, 2015 to submit that admitted amount of `8,50,000/- paid to respondent ought to be adjusted while executing judgment of 2nd June, 2017. Crl.M.C. 1124/2018 Page 1 of 2 Upon hearing and on perusal of ...
Tag this Judgment!Rama Arora & Anr vs.davinder Singh Narang & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~10. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 543/2016 RAMA ARORA & ANR Through: Mr. Aditya Nayyar, Adv. ..... Plaintiffs versus DAVINDER SINGH NARANG & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mrs. Inderjeet Saroop and Mr. Advs. Kumar, Raghav Saroop, Advs. for D-5&6. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari and Mr. Prateek for Cholamandalam Bank. Mr. Samarendra KR, Adv. Corporation Bank. Ms. Usha Singh, Adv. No.12763/2017. Ms. Yamini Khurana and Mr. Sanjeet Singh, Advs. in IA No.2283/2018. for IA in CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0901.2019 IA No.13169/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC).1. In this suit for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale of immovable property, vide ex parte ad interim order dated 24th October, 2016 the defendants no.1 to 7 namely (i) Davinder Singh Narang; (ii) Kulvinder Kaur; (iii) N.S. Narang; (iv) Ravinder Kaur; (v) Jasbir Singh Narula; (vi) Dippy Narula; and, (vii) S. Amandeep Singh Narang, who were then the only defendants, were restrained from selling, ali...
Tag this Judgment!Rajvir Singh vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RAJVIR SINGH Reserved on:10. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:9. h January, 2019 W.P.(C) 23872/2005 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate. Through: Mr. Rajan Sabharwal, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS versus UOI & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. The... Petitioner who has been compulsorily retired from service has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the orders passed by the Disciplinary and Appellate Authority of the Railway Protection Force (Respondents). Factual Background 2. The... Petitioner was recruited as Sub-Inspector in Railway Protection Special Force on 20th March, 1979. He was promoted to the rank of Inspector, Grade-II on 6th May, 1991 and was posted at Ferozpur. It is the stand of the... Petitioner, that at that time, he fell ill with pain in his gall bladder and was admitted to the Railway Hospital, Ferozp...
Tag this Judgment!Y(a Minor) vs.state ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. h January, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 991/2018 Crl. M. (Bail) 1774/2018 (suspension of sentence) X (a minor) STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + CRL.REV.P. 992/2018 Crl. M. (Bail) 1775/2018 (suspension of sentence) Y(a minor) versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sulaiman Khan, Ms. Sanchita Ain, Ms. Azra Rehman and Ms. Sakshi Kotiyal and Ms. Anshu Kapur, Advs. For the Respondent : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ashish Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petitions have been filed by Children in CRL.REV.P991& 992/2018 Page 1 of 13 Conflict of Law. The memo of parties discloses the name of the petitioners. Registry is directed to conceal the names of the petitioners from the ...
Tag this Judgment!Rama Construction Co. Vs.central Public Work Department & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7813/2017 & CM Appl.32228/2017 RAMA CONSTRUCTION CO. ........ Petitioner Decided on:9. h January, 2019 Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Avinash Trivedi & Ms.Ritika Trivedi, Advocates versus CENTRAL PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 & R-2/UOI Mr.Rishi Kapoor & Mr.Satish Rai, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of its tender for certain works i.e. Redevelopment of General Pool Residential Colony at Mohammadpur, New Delhi construction of 400 nos. Type-II and 345 nos. Type-III General Pool Residential Accommodation (GPRA) on EPC basis.2. It is not disputed that in terms of the NIT the petitioner fulfilled the financial eligibility criteria. Its bid, however, was rejected on the ground that it did not comply with the t...
Tag this Judgment!Fabien Corbineau vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 09, 2019 CRL.M.C. 52/2019 & Crl.M.A. 272/2019 FABIEN CORBINEAU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Bhullar, Mr. Bhawani Gupta and Ms. Monalisha Chowdhury, Advocates versus STATE Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional ..... Respondent Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Rajdeep Singh, P.S. IGI Airport CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.696/2018 under Sectionsof IPC1 registered at P.S. IGI Airport, Delhi is sought on merits.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the charge-sheet in this FIR case is ready, but it is not being filed because the Investigating Officer is on leave.3. Let the concerned SHO file the charge-sheet before the trial court on or before 11th January, 2019, so that petitioner can be heard on the point of charge by the trial court at the earliest, as it has been disclosed to this Court by petitioners counsel that petitioner has to reach Seoul within...
Tag this Judgment!Vikas Khurana vs.preeti Khurana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 6/2019 VIKAS KHURANA Date of Judgement:09. h January, 2019 ..... Appellant PREETI KHURANA CORAM: Through: Ms. Deepti Khanna, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: None. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 22.11.2018 passed by the learned Family Court on an application filed by the respondent/wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as HMA) by virtue of which the Family Court has awarded maintenance in the sum of Rs.15,000/- per month for the respondent/wife and the minor school going daughter.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for the disposal of the present appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 11.02.2010 at Gurgaon. One daughter was born on 05.01.2011 out of the said wedlock, who is staying with the respondent/wife. Parties have been residing separately...
Tag this Judgment!M/S b.r. Metals Ltd. & Anr. Vs.cna Metals Inc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1030/2018 Pronounced on: Reserved on:19. h December, 2018 9th January, 2019 % M/S B.R. METALS LTD. & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Amita Gupta, Advocate. versus CNA METALS INC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. No.53714/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.53713/2018 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 32 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.1030/2018 and C.M. Nos. 53711/2018 (under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC) & 53712/2018 (stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendants in the suit RFA No.1030/2018 Page 1 of 12 impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 31.07.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the r...
Tag this Judgment!Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs.ajay Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.13/2019 % HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD ..... Appellant 9th January, 2019 AJAY BHATIA Through: Mr. Rajat Navet, Mr. Mukul Gupta and Mr. Shashi Kant, Advocates No.9811177237). (Mobile versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.M. Kalra and Ms. Sonali Kumar, Advocates (Mobile No.9810135477). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CAVEAT No.8/2019 1. Since counsel for the caveator has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. C.M. Appl. No.544-46/2019 (for exemptions) 2. Exemptions allowed, subject to just exceptions. RFA No.13/2019 Page 1 of 6 C.Ms. stand disposed of. RFA132019 and C.M. Appl. No.543/2019 (for stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 20.08.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the resp...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »