Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 6 of about 755 results (0.014 seconds)Smt. Rashmi Tandon vs.smt. Pramila Tandon & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 31, 2019 CRL.M.C. 512/2017 SMT RASHMI TANDON .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Vaibhav Misra and Ms. Rashmita Roy Chowdhury, Advocates Versus SMT PRAMILA TANDON & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 2260/2019 (Early hearing) By way of this application, petitioner seeks early hearing of this petition. Upon hearing, the application is allowed and the date fixed i.e. of 29th March, 2019 stands cancelled and the hearing of the main petition is advanced to today. The application is accordingly disposed of. CRL.M.C. 512/2017 The challenge in this petition is to impugned order of 22nd December, 2016 which restrains petitioner from approaching the complainant in any manner by physically being in the presence of the complainant within the distance of 20 meters, or any other place where the complainants are working as the both parties...
Tag this Judgment!Ejime David vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 01.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2861/2018 EJIME DAVID versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Anoop Gupta, Advocate. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. ASI Sanjay, Narcotics Cell. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.75/2017 under Sections NDPS Act and Section 14 Foreigners Act, Police Station Crime Branch.2. The allegations are that on 24.05.2017, secret information was received that two persons would come from Punjab to receive huge consignment of heroin from one African national. A raiding party was prepared. No independent witness was willing to join the raiding party.3. It is alleged that at the place which was informed, the raiding party found a Fortuner Car parked in which two of the co-accused were sitting. Subsequen...
Tag this Judgment!Haji Shaida Hassan vs.new India Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:31. t January, 2019 + MAC.APP. 101/2019 & CM APPL. 2208-2209/2019 HAJI SHAIDA HASSAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Rani Chhabra, Advocate versus NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has preferred the present appeal against the impugned Awarded 25.01.2017, passed by the learned tribunal.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the learned tribunal went wrong on the point that Sunid Khan @ Aashif was not holding a valid driving license whereas factually it is incorrect. She further submits that Sunid Khan and Aashif are not different people and is one and the same person and the driving license is in the name of Sunid Khan. She MAC.APP. 101/2019 Page 1 of 3 further submits that Sunid Khan @ Aashif is facing trial qua the accident in question before the Court of Special CJM, Meer...
Tag this Judgment!Gail India Limited vs.triveni Engineering and Industires Limited
Court: Delhi
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB. A. (COMM) 3/2019 Date of Decision :31. t January, 2019 GAIL INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, Adv. versus TRIVENI ENGINEERING AND INDUSTIRES LIMITED Through: Mr.Sourav Roy & Mr.Gaurav Majumdar, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA No.1437/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ARB. A. (COMM.) 3/2019 & IA No.1436/2019 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the Order dated 23.10.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator directing the appellant to return the Performance Bank Guarantee to the respondent.2. The disputes between the parties are in relation to the work of Demineralized (DM) Water Plant and Condensate Polishing Unit (CPU) awarded by the Appellant to the respondent for its Pata Petrochemical II project, Uttar Pradesh. ARB. A. (COMM) 3/2019 Page 1 3. The respondent filed its Statement of Claim before the Ar...
Tag this Judgment!Manish Arora vs.smt. Tajinder Arora
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 31, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 982/2018 SH. MANISH ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar and Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Advocates versus SMT. TAJINDER ARORA Through: Counsel (Appearance not given) .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 27th September, 2018 directs petitioner to pay interim maintenance of 14,000/- per month in proceedings under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for petitioner assails the impugned order on the ground that petitioner has to pay rental of about 7,000/- per month and has to incur other expenses and the interim maintenance granted by the trial court is on higher side and it needs to be suitably reduced. On the contrary, respondents counsel supports the impugned order and submits that there is no illegality in it. Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned order and the material on record, I find that the admitted income of petitioner is 26,899.25/- per m...
Tag this Judgment!Sandhya Educational Society (Regd.) vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 34 + SANDHYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY (REGD.) ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 1667/2015 & CM29842015 Through: Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana and Mr Akshita Chhatwal, Advocates. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr Siddharth Panda, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr Rajeev Jha and Ms Komal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER3001.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayers in the petition read as under: a) issue a writ, order or declaration declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings i.e. section 4 notification dated 22.12.1987, Section 6 declaration dated 29.1.1988 and award no.25/1989-90 dated 23.1.1990 in respect of... Petitioner's land in khasra No.401 admeasuring 4 bigha 03 biswa situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Ghonda Gujran Khadar, Delhi have lapsed in view of sub section 2 of section 24 of "THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENC...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and Ors. Vs.sarwar Ali
Court: Delhi
$~16. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. 01.2019 % W.P.(C) 11455/2015 and C.M. No.30260/2015 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Satpal Singh & Dr. Indra Pratap Singh, Advocates for UOI/ Railways. Versus SARWAR ALI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Tripathi & Ms. Mandavi Pandey, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner Union of India assails the order dated 19.03.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.642/2014 and the order dated 03.11.2015, passed in Review Application No.134/2015.2. The brief background of the case is that the petitioner had taken steps W.P.(C.) No.11455/2015 Page 1 of 6 for selection to the post of Assistant Operating Manager (AOM) which is a Group-B selection post in the pay scale of Rs.7500-12000, against 70% promotee quota. A written test for that purpose was held on 02.09.2006 followed b...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Continental Construction Ltd. & Ors. Vs.registrar of Companies & A ...
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 30, 2019 CRL.M.C. 471/2019 & CRL.M.A. 2045-46/2019 M/S CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION LTD & ORS Through: Mr. Shahid Azad, Advocate .....Petitioners versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The concurrent findings of the Courts below is that the complaint in question is within period of limitation. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is being prosecuted for not filing the annual returns in time. Attention of this Court is drawn to Company Law Boards order of 30th April, 2009 to point out that the filing of annual returns was deferred upto 31st March, 2010 with the rider that statutory authorities, including Registrar of Companies, shall not initiate any prosecution or levy penal fee on account of delay in filing of statutory documents/returns. So, it is submitted that petitioner was justified in not filing th...
Tag this Judgment!The Chairman Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr. Vs.savi ...
Court: Delhi
$~3 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h January, 2019 3 + W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & CM APPL. 44404/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus JYOTI & ORS. 4 + W.P.(C) 11471/2018 & CM APPL. 44406/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS PUSHPA AND ORS. 8 + W.P.(C) 11475/2018 & CM APPL. 44414/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners KOMAL ..... Respondent versus W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 9 versus SAVITRI MEENA5+ W.P.(C) 11472/2018 & CM APPL. 44408/2018 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus AMIT KUMAR & ORS6+ W.P.(C) 11473/2018 & CM APPL. 44410/2018 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. versus SOURAV SHARMA AND ORS. 7 + W.P.(C) 11474/2018 & CM APPL. 44412/2018 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS .......
Tag this Judgment!Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr. Vs.pooja
Court: Delhi
$~3 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h January, 2019 3 + W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & CM APPL. 44404/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus JYOTI & ORS. 4 + W.P.(C) 11471/2018 & CM APPL. 44406/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS PUSHPA AND ORS. 8 + W.P.(C) 11475/2018 & CM APPL. 44414/2018 THE CHAIRMAN DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. ........ Petitioners KOMAL ..... Respondent versus W.P.(C) 11470/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 9 versus SAVITRI MEENA5+ W.P.(C) 11472/2018 & CM APPL. 44408/2018 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus AMIT KUMAR & ORS6+ W.P.(C) 11473/2018 & CM APPL. 44410/2018 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. versus SOURAV SHARMA AND ORS. 7 + W.P.(C) 11474/2018 & CM APPL. 44412/2018 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS .......
Tag this Judgment!