Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Versatile Commotrade Private Limited vs.balraj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h January, 2019. CS(COMM) 982/2016 & IA No.15264/2017 (of defendant u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Aman Prasad and Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Advs. BALRAJ Versus Through: Mr. Kuldeep Sehrawat, Adv. ..... Defendant AND CS(COMM) 983/2016 & IA No.15267/2017 (of defendant u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Aman Prasad and Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Advs. Versus RATTAN SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: Mr. Kuldeep Sehrawat, Adv. ..... Defendant Both suits, under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), are ripe for hearing arguments on the applications of the defendant therein for leave to defend.2. When the suits are called out, none appears for the plaintiff in the suits; the counsel for the defendant in both the suits states that no reply to the applications for leave to defend...
Tarun Gulati & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 09, 2019 CRL.M.C. 58/2019 & Crl.M.A. 284/2019 TARUN GULATI & ORS. Through: Mr. Rohit K. Nagpal, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) of FIR No.139/2013, under Sections Quashing 1. 498- A/406/506/3of IPC, registered at police station Geeta Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 3rd March, 2017 reached between the parties.2. 3. for respondent No.1-State and Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2, accept notice. Respondent No.2 present in the Court has been duly identified by her counsel as the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question. learned Additional Public Prosecutor Notice. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Crl.M.C. 58/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the...
Harish Chander Verma vs.mohinder Kumar Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h January, 2019 CRL.L.P. 668/2016 HARISH CHANDER VERMA Represented by: Mr.J.K. Sharma & Shubham Shivam, Advocates with... Petitioner in Person. ........ Petitioner * % + versus MOHINDER KUMAR VERMA ..... Respondent Represented by: Respondent in person with Ms. Sulenna Verma. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 20th October, 2016 whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent Mohinder Kumar Verma for the offence punishable under SectionIPC, the... Petitioner has preferred the present leave petition.2. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the petitioner and respondent are real brothers who are involved in a dispute relating to property bearing number 719, measuring 300 square yards, situated in the Revenue Estate of Mundka, Delhi. The respondent had filed a suit for permanent injunction bearing Suit No.in 1997 in capacity of attorney of his...
Rohitash Gurjar and Anr. Vs.santoshi Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:9. h January, 2019 + MAC. APP. 866/2017, CM APPL. 35159/2017 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ...Appellant No.1 Through: Mr. S. P. Jain, Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Gambhir and Mr. Kaur, Advocates. Amandeep versus 1. SANTOSHI DEVI W/o Lt. Sh. Bhure Lal 2. MASTER PRIYANSHU S/o Lt. Sh. Bhure Lal 3. BABY PRIYA D/o Lt. Sh. Bhure Lal 4. BABY PREETI D/o Lt. Sh. Bhure Lal 5. KUMAR LAL F/o Lt. Sh. Bhure Lal 6. ROHITASH GURJAR S/o Sh. Matadeen 7. HANSRAJ GURJAR S/o Sh. Matadeen ...Respondents + MAC. APP. 86/2018 ROHITASH GURJAR HANSRAJ GURJAR Through: Mr. S.N. Parasher, Advocate. ...Appellant No.2 ...Appellant No.3 MAC.APP. 866/2017, CM APPL. 35159/2017 & MAC.APP. 86/2018 Page 1 of 7 Through: Ms. Ankita Choudhary, Advocate. versus 1. SANTOSHI DEVI W/o Lt. Sh. Bhure Lal 2. MASTER PRIYANSHU S/o Lt. Sh. Bhure Lal 3. BABY PRIYA D/o Lt. Sh. Bhure Lal 4. BABY PREETI D/o Lt. Sh. Bhure Lal 5. KUMAR LAL F/o Lt. Sh. Bhure Lal 6. NEW INDIA ASSUR...
X (A Minor) vs.state ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. h January, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 991/2018 Crl. M. (Bail) 1774/2018 (suspension of sentence) X (a minor) STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + CRL.REV.P. 992/2018 Crl. M. (Bail) 1775/2018 (suspension of sentence) Y(a minor) versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sulaiman Khan, Ms. Sanchita Ain, Ms. Azra Rehman and Ms. Sakshi Kotiyal and Ms. Anshu Kapur, Advs. For the Respondent : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ashish Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petitions have been filed by Children in CRL.REV.P991& 992/2018 Page 1 of 13 Conflict of Law. The memo of parties discloses the name of the petitioners. Registry is directed to conceal the names of the petitioners from the ...
Raj Kumar vs.university of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6421/2017 & CM APPL. 26584/2017 1. RAJ KUMAR Through: Mr. A.P. Mohanty, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon and Ms.Mamta Tandon, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged notice/letter dated 19.07.2017 of respondent inviting for interview to fill the post on ad hoc basis for the post of Assistant Professor, in question.2. The case of the petitioner is that in the year 2009, he joined Khalsa College, Delhi University as an ad hoc Assistant Professor (Zoology). He worked in said college till 21.05.2012. On 23.07.2012, he joined Deshbandhu College as Assistant Professor (Zoology) on ad hoc basis. The W.P. (C) 6421/2017 Page 1 of 5 said appointment continued thereafter. ...
Madhur Asom & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 09, 2019 CRL.M.C. 46/2019 MADHUR ASOM & ANR. Through: Mr. Atanu Sakia, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Manju Chahal Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 259/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 46/2019 Quashing of FIR No.9/2017, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Dwarka, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 24th August, 2017 (Annexure P-2) arrived at Family Courts, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi. Notice. Ms. Neelam Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present Crl.M.C.46/2019 Page 1 of 3 in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by WSI Manju Chaha...
Mahipal Singh vs.jai Pal Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :9. h January, 2019 + CS (OS) 702/2014 MAHIPAL SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Megha Gurung, Advocate. versus (M:8467919471) JAI PAL SINGH & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH (M:9910263212) Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 10571/2014 (u/O VII Rule 11 CPC) 1. The present suit for partition was instituted on 17th February, 2014 seeking partition of various properties as mentioned in the prayer. Learned counsel for Defendant No.1 has filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC being I.A.10571/2014 on the ground that the suit is not maintainable as the same is barred by limitation.2. The submission of learned counsel for the Defendant is that Defendant No.1 had preferred Civil Suit 95/2005 titled Jai Pal Singh & Anr v. Nand Ram Singh and Ors., in which the Plaintiff, Shri Mahipal Singh, was Defendant No.2. The said suit was filed by Shri Jai Pal Singh on 5th J...
Abdullah Ali Balsharaf & Anr vs.directorate of Enforcement & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on :09. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 3531/2018 & CM Nos. 13961/2018, 19484/2018, 39904/2018 & 51202/2018 ABDULLAH ALI BALSHARAF & ANR versus ........ Petitioners DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr Biswajit Bhattacharya, Senior Advocate with Gurpreet Singh, Advocate. Mr D. P. Singh, SPP with Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC and Mr Manu Mishra, Advocates for R-1 alongwith Mr Naresh Malik, Asst. Dir., PMLA with Mr Karun Bansal, AEO. Ms Surekha Raman, Mr Dileep Poolakkot and Mr Anuj Sharma, Advocates for R-2/BSE Ltd. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners are citizens of Saudi Arabia and have filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the directions issued by officers of the respondent No.1 (Enforcement Directorate) resulting in withholding of the proceeds of equity shares sold by the petitioners o...
Shri Vinod Khurana (Since Deceased) Through His Lrs vs.smt. Ishwar Dev ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2019
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.213/2007 9th January, 2019 SHRI VINOD KHURANA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advocate (M. No.9910401230). SMT. ISHWAR DEVI & OTHERS versus Through: Ms. ........ RESPONDENTS Singh, Advocate (M. No.9873408273). Kamlakshi CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit (since deceased and now represented through his legal heirs) impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 25.11.2006 by which trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiff for the recovery of Rs. 6,14,304/-. The suit amount was claimed by the RFA No.213/2007 Page 1 of 7 appellants/plaintiff as being the balance due and payable by the respondent/defendant to the appellants/plaintiff as this due amount was said to hav...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »