Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 58 of about 755 results (0.018 seconds)Yadav Chand Gupta & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~24-42. 20190/2018 Date of Decision:10. 01.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % W.P.(C) 6941/2015 & CM APPL. 12722-12723/2015, CM APPL. + W.P.(C) 6948/2015 & CM APPL. 12735-12736/2015 + W.P.(C) 6970/2015 & CM APPL. 12768/2015, CM APPL. MONIKA SHARMA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS CHHATARPAL SINGH & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus versus 831/2019 SAREEN DABAS & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7602/2015 & CM APPL. 38562/2017, CM APPL. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus versus 37169/2018 HEMRAJ GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7997/2015 & CM APPL. 16316/2015 KAPIL MANN AND ANR GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent W.P.(C.) No.6941/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 versus LALIT KISHORE CHANDA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus versus PREETI DEVI GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS SATYA PRAKASH SEHRAWAT...
Tag this Judgment!Akhil Sibal Through Amit Sharma & Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h January, 2019 7 & 21 + W.P.(C) 3623/2018 AKHIL SIBAL THROUGH HIS CURRENT GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER ARADHNA BEHL ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Palak Mishra and Ms Suhani Mathur, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Mohit Chaudhary and Mr Imran Ali, Advocates for R-1/GNCTD. Mr Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for the LAC/L&B. Mr Ajay Verma, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 3466/2018 + AKHIL SIBAL THROUGH AMIT SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms Palak Mishra and Ms Suhani Mathur, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for the LAC/L&B. Mr Ajay Verma, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Kafil vs.the State of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4911/2018 MOHD. KAFIL Date of Order: January 10, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Kr. Upadhyay and Mr. Zakir Hussain, Advocates Versus THE STATE OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Omveer Singh, P.S. Nand Nagri. Mr. Kali Charan, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Quashing of FIR No.413/2011, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC r/w Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act registered at police station Nand Nagri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 26th April, 2016 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-4).2. for 3. respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Kali Charan, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. learned Additional Public Prosecutor Notice. Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Crl.M.C. 4911/2018 Page 1 of 3 for Learned Additional Public Prosecutor res...
Tag this Judgment!Chhatarpal Singh & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~24-42. 20190/2018 Date of Decision:10. 01.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % W.P.(C) 6941/2015 & CM APPL. 12722-12723/2015, CM APPL. + W.P.(C) 6948/2015 & CM APPL. 12735-12736/2015 + W.P.(C) 6970/2015 & CM APPL. 12768/2015, CM APPL. MONIKA SHARMA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS CHHATARPAL SINGH & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus versus 831/2019 SAREEN DABAS & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7602/2015 & CM APPL. 38562/2017, CM APPL. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus versus 37169/2018 HEMRAJ GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7997/2015 & CM APPL. 16316/2015 KAPIL MANN AND ANR GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent W.P.(C.) No.6941/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 versus LALIT KISHORE CHANDA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus versus PREETI DEVI GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS SATYA PRAKASH SEHRAWAT...
Tag this Judgment!Sumit Dagar & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~24-42. 20190/2018 Date of Decision:10. 01.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % W.P.(C) 6941/2015 & CM APPL. 12722-12723/2015, CM APPL. + W.P.(C) 6948/2015 & CM APPL. 12735-12736/2015 + W.P.(C) 6970/2015 & CM APPL. 12768/2015, CM APPL. MONIKA SHARMA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS CHHATARPAL SINGH & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus versus 831/2019 SAREEN DABAS & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7602/2015 & CM APPL. 38562/2017, CM APPL. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus versus 37169/2018 HEMRAJ GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7997/2015 & CM APPL. 16316/2015 KAPIL MANN AND ANR GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent W.P.(C.) No.6941/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 versus LALIT KISHORE CHANDA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus versus PREETI DEVI GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS SATYA PRAKASH SEHRAWAT...
Tag this Judgment!Sonia & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~24-42. 20190/2018 Date of Decision:10. 01.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % W.P.(C) 6941/2015 & CM APPL. 12722-12723/2015, CM APPL. + W.P.(C) 6948/2015 & CM APPL. 12735-12736/2015 + W.P.(C) 6970/2015 & CM APPL. 12768/2015, CM APPL. MONIKA SHARMA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS CHHATARPAL SINGH & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus versus 831/2019 SAREEN DABAS & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7602/2015 & CM APPL. 38562/2017, CM APPL. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus versus 37169/2018 HEMRAJ GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7997/2015 & CM APPL. 16316/2015 KAPIL MANN AND ANR GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent W.P.(C.) No.6941/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 versus LALIT KISHORE CHANDA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus versus PREETI DEVI GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS SATYA PRAKASH SEHRAWAT...
Tag this Judgment!Mr. Deepak & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 10, 2019 CRL.M.C. 65/2019 & Crl.M.A. 335/2019 MR. DEEPAK & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Hitesh Chopra & Mr. Ashok, Advocates STATE & ANR. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Manoj Chauhan Mr. Pradeep Kumar Pathak, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.658/2018, under Section 324 IPC, registered at police station Paschim Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 8th December, 2018 reached between the parties. Izhar Ahmed, Upon notice, Mr. learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State and Mr. Pradeep Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.2, accept notice. Respondent No.2 present in the Court has been duly identified by his counsel as the complainant/first- informant of the FIR in question. Crl.M.C. 65/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respo...
Tag this Judgment!Carlos Alberto Perez Lafuente vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:10. 01.2019 % W.P.(C) 4573/2012 CARLOS ALBERTO PEREZ LAFUENTE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashutosh Kumar and Mr.Vinod Chauhan, Advocates. versus UOI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr.Srivats Kaushal and Mr. Aditya Madaan, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Anil Dutt and Ms. Gunjan Hans, Advocates for intervener. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 13069/2018 (under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC) 1. By this application, applicant seeks to intervene in the matter. Since we have heard the submissions of learned counsel for the applicant on merits, this application has become infructuous. The same is accordingly disposed of. W.P.(C) 4573/2012 & CM APPL. 9501/2012 (for stay) 2. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the W.P.(C) 4573/2012 Page 1 of 39 order dated 30.01.2012 passed by the Deputy Controller of Patents &...
Tag this Judgment!Dhruv Kumar Sharma vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and An ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8939/2018 & CM APPLs. 35536/2018, 37417/2018 Pronounced on:9. h January, 2019 53723/2018 DHRUV KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Girish Kumar Sharma and Ms. Sushma Sharma, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS and Jasbir Bidhuri Through: Mr. Mr.Arun Sanwal, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Ankit Jain and Mr. Siddharth Nath, Advs. for R-2 Ms. Binisa Mohanty and Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Advs. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT Dhruv Kumar Sharma, the petitioner, has moved this Court, for % 1. issuance of a writ of mandamus, to the Fairfield Institute of Management and Technology (hereinafter referred to as FIMT), to issue a No Objection Certificate (NOC), which would enable him to migrate to one of the other colleges/institutes affiliated to the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (impleaded as Respondent No.1 W.P.(C) 8939/2018 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Mr. Anil Gupta vs.ligman Lighting Company Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1420/2015 MR. ANIL GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Inklee Roy Barooah, Advocate. Versus LIGMAN LIGHTING COMPANY LTD. & ORS. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Through: ..... Defendants None. Date of Decision:09. h January, 2019 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 2721/2018 1. Present application has been filed by the plaintiff under Order IX Rule 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure for recall of order dated 05th January, 2018, whereby the present suit was dismissed in default and on account of non-prosecution, and for restoration of the present suit to its original number and position.2. In the application, it has been averred that the counsel for the plaintiff had wrongly noted the date of hearing as week commencing 22nd January, 2018 instead of week commencing 02nd January, 2018. CS (OS) 1420/2015 Page 1 of 11 3. Keeping in view the averments in the application, order dated 05th January, 2018 is recalled and the present suit r...
Tag this Judgment!