Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 57 of about 755 results (0.012 seconds)M/S S K Jain Bros, Helemet (I) Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Vega Auto Accessories Pv ...
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. 01.2019 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 206/2018 & CM No.35787/2018 M/S S K JAIN BROS, HELEMET (I) PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. Ishani Chandra, Mr. Ankit Rastogi and Mr. Ravindra Raturi, Advs. versus M/S VEGA AUTO ACCESSORIES PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Diva Arora and Mr. Mudit Tayal, Advs. with Md. Yusuf, Authorised Representative of the respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 01.06.2018 passed on an application filed by the respondent herein under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC and an application filed by the appellant (defendant in the suit) under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC in a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of a registered design in relation to helmets and for ancillary reliefs. The learned Single Judge by the impugned order has allowed the application filed by the ...
Tag this Judgment!Greaves Cotton Limited vs.newage Generators Private Limited
Court: Delhi
$~OS-20 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. 01.2019 CS(COMM) 531/2017 GREAVES COTTON LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Vineet Tayal, Adv. Versus NEWAGE GENERATORS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through Mr.Saurabh Seth, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) OA No.3/2019 in CS(Comm.)531/2017 1. This appeal is filed seeking to impugn the order of Joint Registrar dated 20.11.2018 whereby the application for condonation of delay in re- filing the written statement was dismissed and the written statement filed by the defendant/appellant was not taken on record.2. Learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that the appellant/defendant was served on 31.8.2017 and the written statement has admittedly been filed on 23.12.2017 i.e. within 82 days. Hence, there was a delay and an application for condonation of delay has been filed. He also states that the parties were appearing before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliatio...
Tag this Judgment!Pooja Press & Prakashan Pvt. Ltd. Vs.spectrum Magazine Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 10, 2019 CRL.M.C. 5317/2017 POOJA PRESS & PRAKASHAN PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. T.P.S.Kang, Advocate Versus SPECTRUM MAGAZINE LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 30th August, 2017 rejects petitioners application for providing correct name and address of respondent while observing that second respondent has been described as Amit Metre in the Memo of Parties and so, name of respondent cannot be changed to Anil Metre, as the whole controversy is regarding name of respondent No.2 and thus, notice has been issued by the Revisional Court vide impugned order to Amit Metre and not Anil Metre. Notice of this petition to opposite side is dispensed with, as notice has not been issued by the Revisional Court to the respondents.... Petitioners counsel submits that the Revisional Court has noticed that although in the complaint under Sectio...
Tag this Judgment!Santosh Mahajan vs.shachi Mahajan
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:19. h December, 2018 Judgment delivered on:10. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1868/2016 & Crl.M.A.35881/2018 SHACHI MAHAJAN versus SANTOSH MAHAJAN ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + CRL.REV.P. 345/2016 & Crl.M.A.7580/2016 SANTOSH MAHAJAN versus SHACHI MAHAJAN ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Pandey, Adv. with petitioner in person in CRL.M.C. 1868/2016 Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Mr. Khushbir Singh, Mr. Anshul Mittal & Ms. Shaiza, Advs. in CRL.REV.P. 345/2016 For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Mr. Khushbir Singh, Mr. Anshul Mittal & Ms. Shaiza, Advs. in CRL.M.C. 1868/2016 Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Pandey with respondent in person Advs. in CRL.REV.P. 345/2016 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. 1868/2016 & Crl.M.A.35881/2018 (under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 12 Contempt of Courts Act) C...
Tag this Judgment!The Nalgonda Rangareddy District Milk Producers Mutually Aided Coopera ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 11.2018 Pronounced on:10. h January, 2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 261/2018 with CM Appl. Nos. 34779 & 37383/2016 THE NALGONDA RANGAREDDY DISTRICT MILK PRODUCERS MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE UNION LTD Through: Mr. Jayant ..... Appellant K. Mehta, Mr.Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Mr.Rahul Kukreja & Ms.Drishti Harpalani, Advocates. versus MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRIVATE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Advocate Bharti, Mr.Sukrit Ms.Shruti with Ms.Shweta Mr.Shantanu, R.Kapoor Shivkumar, Advocates. & CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.% 1. The appellant is the defendant in CS(OS) No.1350/2015 filed by the respondent herein, claiming an injunction restraining the appellant from using the trademark Mother Dairy. This appeal is directed against an order dated 14.09.2016 passed by the learned FAO(OS)(COMM) 261/2018 Page 1 of 9 Single Judge on the application of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Indian Radiological Imaging Association & Anr. Vs.lalendra Upreti & Or ...
Court: Delhi
$~3 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:10. 01.2019 F.A.O. No.581/2018 INDIAN RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING ASSOCIATION & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Advocate Gupta, Mr.Mohit with Advocate. versus LALENDRA UPRETI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Meet Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Jaya Goyal, Manpreet and Ms.Bhagyashree Shukla, Advocates for R1. Kaur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL C.M. No.54961/2018 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.1. FAO5812018 & C.M. No.54960/2018 (for stay) 2. The impugned order dated 22.12.2018 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge -01, South District, New Delhi (ADJ) in CS No.11(sic. 1145/18) titled as Lalendra Upreti Vs. Indian Radiological and Imaging Association and Ors. by which injunction was granted in favour of the respondent no.1/plaintiff against the appellants/defendant no.1 and 4 under Order 39 Rule 1 and F.A.O. No.581/2018 Page 1 of 3 2 read with Section 151 Co...
Tag this Judgment!Sareen Dabas & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~24-42. 20190/2018 Date of Decision:10. 01.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % W.P.(C) 6941/2015 & CM APPL. 12722-12723/2015, CM APPL. + W.P.(C) 6948/2015 & CM APPL. 12735-12736/2015 + W.P.(C) 6970/2015 & CM APPL. 12768/2015, CM APPL. MONIKA SHARMA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS CHHATARPAL SINGH & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus versus 831/2019 SAREEN DABAS & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7602/2015 & CM APPL. 38562/2017, CM APPL. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus versus 37169/2018 HEMRAJ GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7997/2015 & CM APPL. 16316/2015 KAPIL MANN AND ANR GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent W.P.(C.) No.6941/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 versus LALIT KISHORE CHANDA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus versus PREETI DEVI GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS SATYA PRAKASH SEHRAWAT...
Tag this Judgment!Harcharan Singh vs.director of Education and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved:13. 12.2018 Pronounced on:10.01.2019 + W.P.(C) 8030/2012 HARCHARAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Virender Goswami, Ms. Soni and Mr. Shamik Saha, Singh Advocates. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kanishk Rana and Mr. Rao Abdul Ahad Khan, Advocates for R-1. Mr. K. P. Sundar Rao and Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Jha, Advocates for School. Dr. Balesh, Dy. Education Zone-15. Ms. Latika Choudhary, Advocate for Director of Education. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 The petitioner vide the present petition seeks quashing of the impugned order dated 30.10.2012 of Delhi School Tribunal in Appeal No.78/2012. Consequently, quashing the impugned order dated 20.10.2010 passed by the Disciplinary Committee. W.P.(C) 8030/2012 Page 1 of 33 2. The case of the petitioner is that he joined respondent School as Fee Clerk and thereafter promoted up to UDC and at the relevant time he was working as ...
Tag this Judgment!Sandeep Kumar & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~24-42. 20190/2018 Date of Decision:10. 01.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % W.P.(C) 6941/2015 & CM APPL. 12722-12723/2015, CM APPL. + W.P.(C) 6948/2015 & CM APPL. 12735-12736/2015 + W.P.(C) 6970/2015 & CM APPL. 12768/2015, CM APPL. MONIKA SHARMA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS CHHATARPAL SINGH & ORS GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus versus 831/2019 SAREEN DABAS & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7602/2015 & CM APPL. 38562/2017, CM APPL. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus versus 37169/2018 HEMRAJ GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + W.P.(C) 7997/2015 & CM APPL. 16316/2015 KAPIL MANN AND ANR GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent W.P.(C.) No.6941/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 versus LALIT KISHORE CHANDA & ORS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus versus PREETI DEVI GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS SATYA PRAKASH SEHRAWAT...
Tag this Judgment!Shirani Devi & Ors. Vs.the Management of M/S Delhi Transport Corporati ...
Court: Delhi
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA4842017 SHIRANI DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus Through: Mr. U.N. Tiwary, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER1001.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19th April 2017 of the learned Single Judge of this Court allowing W.P.(C) 5590/2013 filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), the Respondent herein, and holding that the charge against late Shri Ambika Ram, who worked as a Conductor with the DTC, stood proved and the punishment of removal from service imposed upon him was justified.2. It requires to be noted that late Shri Ambika Ram expired during the pendency of the writ petition and by order dated 8th November, 2010, his legal representatives (LRs) were brought on record. They have filed the LPA4842017 Page 1 of 10 present appeal. For the sake of...
Tag this Judgment!