Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 52 of about 755 results (0.011 seconds)Anubhav Dham & Anr. Vs.the Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 674/2016 and Crl.M.A.2921/2016 ANUBHAV DHAM & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ranvir Singh, Advocate with Mr. Sanjiv Chaudhary, & Mr. Nausheen Momani, Advocates versus ........ RESPONDENTS THE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State Mr. Punya Garg, Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (CC No.219/01/2015), originally presented in 2012, by order dated 16.09.2015, the petitioners along with five others have been summoned as accused to face criminal prosecution on the accusations of having committed offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 qua certain cheques which were issued in favour of the second respondent (the complainant) against the account of M/s. Amtek Rail Car Industries Pvt. Ltd., the role of the petitioners, impleaded in the array as thi...
Tag this Judgment!Vibhas Kumar Jha vs.delhi High Court Legal Service Committee
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:11. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 839/2018 & CM No.8143/2018 VIBHAS KUMAR JHA versus DELHI HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner: Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao and Mr. Karthik Sundar. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner is a practicing advocate. He has filed the present petition impugning the selection of legal practitioners for empanelment with the respondent (hereafter the Committee) on the panel of jail visiting advocates and panel of advocates (criminal).2. The petitioner had applied for being empanelled as a lawyer on the panel of jail visiting advocates (hereafter the Jail Visiting Panel) pursuant to the notice inviting applications issued on 18.02.2016. The petitioner is, essentially, aggrieved by not being selected for W.P. ...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Prasad vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ Versus Versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner RAKESH ASTHANA DEVENDER KUMAR Judgment delivered on:11.01.2019 W.P.(CRL) 3247/2018 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 34807-08/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.....Respondents * % + + W.P.(CRL) 3248/2018 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 34811-12/2018, 35599/2018 + Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Swatik Dalai and Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocates for... Petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) 3247/2018. Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari and Mr. Shashwat Singh, Advocates for... Petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) 3248/2018. Ms. Seema Seth, Advocate for... Petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) 3292/2018. Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, Additional Solicitor CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.....Respondents CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.....Respondents W.P.(CRL) 3292/2018 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 35067-68 MANOJ PRASAD ........ Petitioner Versus WP(Crl.) Nos. 3247, 3248 & 3292-2018 Page 1 of 39 Ge...
Tag this Judgment!Mahender Pratap Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~13 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 182/2019 MAHENDER PRATAP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Tathagat, Advocate. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Avinsh Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for R-1 & 2. Mr. Naresh Kaushik with Mr.Lakshya Juneja, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. APPL. 886/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of accordingly. W.P.(C) 182/2019 The petitioner assails the order dated 16.08.2018 passed 1. by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal) in W.P.(C) 182/2019 Page 1 of 7 T.A. No.73/2013. The Tribunal rejected the said Transfer Application preferred by the petitioner. The petitioner had preferred W.P.(C) No.4006/2013 before this Court, which was transferred to the Tribunal on 21.8.2013 and registered as T.A. No....
Tag this Judgment!Mahboob & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 11, 2019 CRL.M.C. 6513/2018 & Crl.M.A. 50241/2018 MAHBOOB & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.Shah, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Balbir... RESPONDENTS 2 to 6 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.134/2012, under Section 323/4IPC, registered at police station Khajuri Khas, Delhi is sought in this petition. Upon notice, Mr. M.S.Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondents No.2 to 6 are present in the Court and they have been duly identified by SI Balbir as the complainant party of the FIR in question.... RESPONDENTS No.2 to 6, present in the Court, affirm contents of their affidavits of 11th December, 2018 filed in support of this petition and submit that the incident in question had taken place due...
Tag this Judgment!Devender Kumar vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ Versus Versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner RAKESH ASTHANA DEVENDER KUMAR Judgment delivered on:11.01.2019 W.P.(CRL) 3247/2018 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 34807-08/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.....Respondents * % + + W.P.(CRL) 3248/2018 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 34811-12/2018, 35599/2018 + Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Swatik Dalai and Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocates for... Petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) 3247/2018. Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari and Mr. Shashwat Singh, Advocates for... Petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) 3248/2018. Ms. Seema Seth, Advocate for... Petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) 3292/2018. Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, Additional Solicitor CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.....Respondents CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.....Respondents W.P.(CRL) 3292/2018 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 35067-68 MANOJ PRASAD ........ Petitioner Versus WP(Crl.) Nos. 3247, 3248 & 3292-2018 Page 1 of 39 Ge...
Tag this Judgment!Om Prakash vs.iocl Officers Welfare Society & Anr
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h January, 2019 OM PRAKASH CS(OS) 590/2016 Through: Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav and Mr. ..... Plaintiff Versus Vinayak Sharma, Advs. IOCL OFFICERS WELFARE SOCIETY & ANR..... Defendants Through: Mr. Shyamal Kumar and Mr. Samdarshi Sanjay, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.5463/2017 (of defendants u/O VII R-11 CPC) 1. The counsel for the defendants/applicants states that with the filing of subsequent application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), this application has become infructuous.2. The application is disposed of. IA No.11174/2018 (of defendants u/O VII R-11 CPC) 3. The two defendants, namely (i) M/s IOCL Officers Welfare Society and (ii) Bijoy Kumar Sharma seek rejection of the amended plaint dated 16th July, 2018 in this suit for recovery of Rs.3,72,00,000/- with pendente lite and future interest at 12% per annum, on the ground of (i) the plaintiff having not a...
Tag this Judgment!Archita @ Anu Seth vs.sunil Seth
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 01.2019 CRL.REV.P. 455/2015 Crl. M.A. 10423/2015 maintenance) (interim ARCHITA @ ANU SETH SUNIL SETH versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. S.K. Srivastava and Mr. Gurjeet Singh, Advs. Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Sidharth Chopra and Ms. Shaini Bhardwaj, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER1101.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner-Wife impugns judgment dated 07.05.2015 whereby the application of the petitioner under Section 125 Cr. P.C. claiming maintenance has been dismissed inter-alia, on the ground that the petitioner has failed to show that she had sufficient cause for living separately. CRL.REV.P4552015 Page 1 of 7 2. Parties were married on 31.01.2004 according to Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. Thereafter, disputes arose and parties started living separately since 03.04.2004.3. Mat...
Tag this Judgment!Ranbir Singh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 11, 2019 CRL.M.C. 118/2019 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. Anil Hooda, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Hukum Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1045/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/5of IPC, registered at police station Mehrauli, New Delhi is sought on the ground that petitioners and respondent No.2-complainant are happily living together. Notice. Mr. M.P.Singh, for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Hukum Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. learned Additional Public Prosecutor Crl.M.C. 118/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute w...
Tag this Judgment!Amarjeet Singh vs.shriram Insight Share Brokers Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 10.2018 Date of decision :11. 01.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM.) 226/2016 & IA No.15604/2015 (Delay) AMARJEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudhir K.Makkar, Sr. Adv. with Singh, Ms.Saumya Gupta, Mr.Gaurav Mr.Sudhanshu Mr.Abhishek Chaudhary, Advs. Suman, versus SHRIRAM INSIGHT SHARE BROKERS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajinder Mathur, Mr.N.Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA11. A common judgment has been passed with the lead case being O.M.P. 418/2015 titled Surinder Kaur vs. Shriram Insight Share Brokers Ltd. For the reasons stated therein, the present petition and all pending applications are dismissed with no order as to cost.2. A copy of the aforesaid order in O.M.P. 418/2015 is placed below. JANUARY11 2019/rv/vp NAVIN CHAWLA, J O.M.P. (COMM.) 226/2016 Page 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 10.2018 Date of decision :11. 01.2019 + O.M.P. 418/2015 + O...
Tag this Judgment!