Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 51 of about 755 results (0.009 seconds)Hugo Boss Trade Mark Management Gmbh & Co. Kg vs.ms. Sheeta Sabharwal ...
Court: Delhi
4 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1236/2018& I.A. 15717/2018 HUGO BOSS TRADE MARK MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Karan Bajaj, Advocate with Ms. Shreya Sethi, Ms. Kangan Roda and Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Advocates. versus MS. SHEETA SABHARWAL T/A BOSS BIG BOSS ..... Defendants Through: None. . Date of Decision:11. hJanuary, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademarks, passing off, unfair trade practices, delivery up, rendition of accounts and damages. Today, learned counsel for plaintiff is permitted to re-number the prayer clause after initialing the same. The corrected prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-"CS (COMM) 1236/2018 Page 1 of 11 A. B. Pass a decree of declaration that the trade marks BOSS, HUGO BOSS and BOSS formative/family of marks of the Plaintiff are well-known trade marks. The Defendant, their partners, of...
Tag this Judgment!Surinder Kaur vs.shriram Insight Share Brokers Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 10.2018 Date of decision :11. 01.2019 + O.M.P. 418/2015 + O.M.P. (COMM.) 216/2016 + O.M.P. (COMM.) 224/2016 & IA156022015(delay) + O.M.P. (COMM.) 226/2016 & IA156042015(delay) + O.M.P. 228/2016 & (COMM.) IAs 14981/2015, 14982/2015(delay) SURINDER KAUR ISHER SINGH KULWANT KAUR AMARJEET SINGH RANBIR KAUR ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudhir K.Makkar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Gaurav Singh, Ms.Saumya Gupta, Mr.Sudhanshu Mr.Abhishek Chaudhary, Advs. Suman, versus SHRIRAM INSIGHT SHARE BROKERS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajinder Mathur, Mr.N.Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA11. These petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) praying for setting aside of separate orders/Awards dated 17.02.2015 passed by the Appellate Panel o...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Asthana vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ Versus Versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner RAKESH ASTHANA DEVENDER KUMAR Judgment delivered on:11.01.2019 W.P.(CRL) 3247/2018 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 34807-08/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.....Respondents * % + + W.P.(CRL) 3248/2018 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 34811-12/2018, 35599/2018 + Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Swatik Dalai and Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocates for... Petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) 3247/2018. Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari and Mr. Shashwat Singh, Advocates for... Petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) 3248/2018. Ms. Seema Seth, Advocate for... Petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) 3292/2018. Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, Additional Solicitor CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.....Respondents CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.....Respondents W.P.(CRL) 3292/2018 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 35067-68 MANOJ PRASAD ........ Petitioner Versus WP(Crl.) Nos. 3247, 3248 & 3292-2018 Page 1 of 39 Ge...
Tag this Judgment!Harish Bajaj vs.desh Raj Bajaj (Deceased) Through Lrs. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % HARISH BAJAJ RFA No.23/2019 11th January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aditya Shankar, Advocate with Mr. Avijit Singh, Advocate (M. No.8130729886). versus DESH RAJ BAJAJ (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Advocate with Mr. Pratik Malik, Advocate, Mr. Kartikey Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Adit Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1 (M. No.9953212337). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat No.16/2019 1. Counsel appears for the caveator. Caveat stands discharged. RFA No.23/2019 Page 1 of 12 C.M. No.950/2019(exemption) 2. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Nos. 951/2019(for condonation of delay in filing) & 952/2019(for condonation of delay in re-filing) 3. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay of 60 days in filing and 44 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M.s stand d...
Tag this Judgment!Kailash Gupta vs.state
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 11, 2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2593/2018 KAILASH GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Advocate STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR .....Respondent ORDER... Petitioner seeks bail in FIR No.198/17, under Sections 21/of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (henceforth referred to as the NDPS Act) and SectionsIPC, registered at P.S. Crime Branch (SED) on the ground that 10,600 bottles of Phensydyl syrup were recovered from petitioner.... Petitioners counsel submits that petitioner is an authorized licensee who had sold the Phensydyl syrup to various parties. It is submitted that the recovered drug does not come within the ambit of NDPS Act. To submit so, attention of this Court is drawn to notification of 14th November, 1985 (Annexure P-17) to point out that recovered Phensydyl syrup contains less than 2.5 percent of Codeine. It is further submitted th...
Tag this Judgment!Arti Kapahi vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC for UOI. Ms.Mrinalini Sen, Standing Counsel with Mr.Tanmay Yadav, Advocate for DDA. Mr.Siddharth Panda, Advocate for LAC/L&B. $~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARTI KAPAHI W.P.(C) 10140/2015 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.N.S.Vasisht with Mr.M.P.Bhargava, Advocates. ORDER1101.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayers in the present petition read as under: In the facts and circumstances hereinabove stated, the... Petitioner most humbly pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: (i) issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other writ, order or direction of the similar nature declaring the entire acquisition with respect to the land to 6 Bighas 12 Biswas of land of the... Petitioner comprised in Khasra Nos.90(901 min) (4-0) & 90(2-12) situated in the revenue estate of village Satbari, NCT of Delhi having lapsed and further quashing t...
Tag this Judgment!Shanti & Ors. Vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 11, 2019 CRL.M.C. 94/2019 & Crl.M.A. 425/2019 SHANTI & ORS. Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Rajesh Mumar Rao, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.747/2001, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at police station Uttam Nagar, New Delhi is sought is sought on the basis of Settlement of 6th March, 2014 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre (Annexure P-3). Notice. Mr. M.S.Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present in the Court and on the basis of identity proof produced by her, she has been identified to be complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question. Crl.M.C. 94/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present i...
Tag this Judgment!Pramanshi & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h January, 2019. % + W.P.(C) 2624/2018 PRAMANSHI & ORS Through: In person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. for R1. Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. for GNCTD. Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for NCW/R7 with Ms. Sonia Sharma, an officer of NCW. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers: In view of the above facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or Order / Direction / declaration to: i. Direct... RESPONDENTS no.4 and 5 to convene an Expert Committee to chalk out guidelines and put in place regulations and protocols to ensure women safety during occasions such as Holi. ii. Direct the ...
Tag this Judgment!Ranbir Kaur vs.shriram Insight Share Brokers Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 10.2018 Date of decision :11. 01.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM.) 228/2016 & IA Nos. 14981/2015 & 14982/2015 (Delay) RANBIR KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudhir K.Makkar, Sr. Adv. with Singh, Ms.Saumya Gupta, Mr.Gaurav Mr.Sudhanshu Mr.Abhishek Chaudhary, Advs. Suman, versus SHRIRAM INSIGHT SHARE BROKERS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajinder Mathur, Mr.N.Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA11. A common judgment has been passed with the lead case being O.M.P. 418/2015 titled Surinder Kaur vs. Shriram Insight Share Brokers Ltd. For the reasons stated therein, the present petition and all pending applications are dismissed with no order as to cost.2. A copy of the aforesaid order in O.M.P. 418/2015 is placed below. JANUARY11 2019/rv/vp NAVIN CHAWLA, J O.M.P. (COMM.) 228/2016 Page 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 10.2018 Date of decision :11. 01.2019 + O.M.P. ...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Manish Chopra & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 11, 2019 CRL.M.C. 107/2019 & Crl.M.A. 471/2019 SH. MANISH CHOPRA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Kaushik, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Rajbir Singh Mr. Nishant Anand & Ms. Harsha Sharma, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.486/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Uttam Nagar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement-Agreement of 8th October, 2018 arrived at Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (Annexure P-3). Notice. Mr. M.P.Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Rajbir Singh on the basis of...
Tag this Judgment!