Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 5 of about 755 results (0.020 seconds)Sh. Jhunna Mal vs.govt. Of n.c.t of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:31. t January, 2019 SH. JHUNNA MAL + W.P.(C) 508/2019 & CM APPL. 2399/2019 GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI AND ORS. versus Through: Mr.M.A.Khan, Advocate ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Anuj Kapoor, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT1 This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondent Nos.2 to 5 for making entries in the khasra register in column No.21 of the khasra Girdwari in respect of the harvesting of the crops of the petitioners.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject land was in cultivatory physical possession of the father of the petitioner for last more than 40 years and the same is in continuous cultivatory possession of the petitioner. He further submits that despite oral and written request, the W.P.(C) 508/2019 Page...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Kumar & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 31, 2019 CRL.M.C. 519/2019 MANOJ KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dharmender Rana, Advocate STATE & ANR. versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Rajneesh Kapoor and Mr. S.S. Rawat, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.425/2016, under Sections 308/1of IPC registered at police station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 16th November, 2018 (Annexure P/4) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Mr. M.S.Oberoi, for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Rajneesh Kapoor, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. learned Additional Public Prosecutor Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Chand Rana vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Bhagwan vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Tag this Judgment!Sameer Madan & Anr vs.j S Dhillon & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.561/2014 SAMEER MADAN & ANR. 31st January, 2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Adit Singh, Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Advocate (Mobile No.9953212337) with appellant No.1 in person. versus J S DHILLON & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kishore M. Gajaria and Mr. Aayush Paranjpe, Advocates (Mobile No.9811159082). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.561/2014 and C.M. Appl. No.4453/2017 (for directions), C.M. Appl. No 4197/2018 (for directions), C.M. Appl. No 54017/2018 (for extension of time to vacate the premises) 1. This is an unfortunate case where this Court is forced to pass a judgment on merits for allowing the appeal, and this is only because of the unnecessary and unreasonable obduracy shown by the RFA No.561/2014 Page 1 of 23 respondent No.1/plaintiff. The obduracy is because though the appellants/defendant nos. 1 and 2 were not bound to va...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Rajendra Prasad & Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.govind Yadav & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t January, 2019 + CS(COMM) 819/2018 & I.As. 5616/2018, 14586/2018 1. M/S ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTILLERS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate Chhabra, with Mr.Pundreek Dwivedi and Ms.Vijay Laxmi Mewara, Advocates Mr.Sanjay versus GOVIND YADAV & ANR Through: ..... Defendants JUDGMENT The plaintiff is the proprietor of the trademark Officers Choice. The plaintiff adopted the aforesaid trademark in the year 1988 and is using the same in respect of its alcoholic products. The particulars of the registration of the plaintiffs trademark are given in paragraph 10 of the plaint. The plaintiff claims the aforesaid trademark to be a well known trademark. The plaintiff has registered its label under the Copyright Act. The particulars of the copyright registration of the plaintiffs label are given in paragraph 12 of the plaint.2. The defendants are using the mark Fauji in respect of their alcoholic pro...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Byas Rai vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Surjeet Singh vs.govt. Of n.c.t of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:31. t January, 2019 SH. SURJEET SINGH + W.P.(C) 485/2019 & CM APPL. 2170/2019 GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI AND ORS. versus Through: Mr.M.A.Khan, Advocate ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Anuj Kapoor, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT1 This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondent Nos.2 to 5 for making entries in the khasra register in column No.21 of the khasra Girdwari in respect of the harvesting of the crops of the petitioners.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject land was in cultivatory physical possession of the father of the petitioner for last more than 40 years and the same is in continuous cultivatory possession of the petitioner. He further submits that despite oral and written request, the W.P.(C) 485/2019 ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Rashmi Tandon vs.smt. Pramila Tandon & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 31, 2019 CRL.M.C. 512/2017 SMT RASHMI TANDON .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Vaibhav Misra and Ms. Rashmita Roy Chowdhury, Advocates Versus SMT PRAMILA TANDON & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 2260/2019 (Early hearing) By way of this application, petitioner seeks early hearing of this petition. Upon hearing, the application is allowed and the date fixed i.e. of 29th March, 2019 stands cancelled and the hearing of the main petition is advanced to today. The application is accordingly disposed of. CRL.M.C. 512/2017 The challenge in this petition is to impugned order of 22nd December, 2016 which restrains petitioner from approaching the complainant in any manner by physically being in the presence of the complainant within the distance of 20 meters, or any other place where the complainants are working as the both parties...
Tag this Judgment!