Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Jhunna Mal vs.govt. Of n.c.t of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:31. t January, 2019 SH. JHUNNA MAL + W.P.(C) 508/2019 & CM APPL. 2399/2019 GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI AND ORS. versus Through: Mr.M.A.Khan, Advocate ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Anuj Kapoor, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT1 This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondent Nos.2 to 5 for making entries in the khasra register in column No.21 of the khasra Girdwari in respect of the harvesting of the crops of the petitioners.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject land was in cultivatory physical possession of the father of the petitioner for last more than 40 years and the same is in continuous cultivatory possession of the petitioner. He further submits that despite oral and written request, the W.P.(C) 508/2019 Page...
Manoj Kumar & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 31, 2019 CRL.M.C. 519/2019 MANOJ KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dharmender Rana, Advocate STATE & ANR. versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Rajneesh Kapoor and Mr. S.S. Rawat, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.425/2016, under Sections 308/1of IPC registered at police station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 16th November, 2018 (Annexure P/4) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Mr. M.S.Oberoi, for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Rajneesh Kapoor, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. learned Additional Public Prosecutor Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is...
Ramesh Chand Rana vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2019
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Jai Bhagwan vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2019
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Sameer Madan & Anr vs.j S Dhillon & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2019
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.561/2014 SAMEER MADAN & ANR. 31st January, 2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Adit Singh, Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Advocate (Mobile No.9953212337) with appellant No.1 in person. versus J S DHILLON & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kishore M. Gajaria and Mr. Aayush Paranjpe, Advocates (Mobile No.9811159082). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.561/2014 and C.M. Appl. No.4453/2017 (for directions), C.M. Appl. No 4197/2018 (for directions), C.M. Appl. No 54017/2018 (for extension of time to vacate the premises) 1. This is an unfortunate case where this Court is forced to pass a judgment on merits for allowing the appeal, and this is only because of the unnecessary and unreasonable obduracy shown by the RFA No.561/2014 Page 1 of 23 respondent No.1/plaintiff. The obduracy is because though the appellants/defendant nos. 1 and 2 were not bound to va...
M/S Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.govind Yadav & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t January, 2019 + CS(COMM) 819/2018 & I.As. 5616/2018, 14586/2018 1. M/S ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTILLERS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate Chhabra, with Mr.Pundreek Dwivedi and Ms.Vijay Laxmi Mewara, Advocates Mr.Sanjay versus GOVIND YADAV & ANR Through: ..... Defendants JUDGMENT The plaintiff is the proprietor of the trademark Officers Choice. The plaintiff adopted the aforesaid trademark in the year 1988 and is using the same in respect of its alcoholic products. The particulars of the registration of the plaintiffs trademark are given in paragraph 10 of the plaint. The plaintiff claims the aforesaid trademark to be a well known trademark. The plaintiff has registered its label under the Copyright Act. The particulars of the copyright registration of the plaintiffs label are given in paragraph 12 of the plaint.2. The defendants are using the mark Fauji in respect of their alcoholic pro...
Shri Rajendra Prasad & Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2019
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Ram Byas Rai vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2019
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Sh. Surjeet Singh vs.govt. Of n.c.t of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:31. t January, 2019 SH. SURJEET SINGH + W.P.(C) 485/2019 & CM APPL. 2170/2019 GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI AND ORS. versus Through: Mr.M.A.Khan, Advocate ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Anuj Kapoor, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT1 This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondent Nos.2 to 5 for making entries in the khasra register in column No.21 of the khasra Girdwari in respect of the harvesting of the crops of the petitioners.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject land was in cultivatory physical possession of the father of the petitioner for last more than 40 years and the same is in continuous cultivatory possession of the petitioner. He further submits that despite oral and written request, the W.P.(C) 485/2019 ...
Subhash Chander vs.bal Krishan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :10. h January, 2019 Date of decision :31. t January, 2019 CM(M) 1255/2018 & CM APPL. 42905/2018 SUBHASH CHANDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Daljinder Singh & Mr. Avineet Singh, Advocates. versus BAL KRISHAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Goyal, Mr. Amitesh Giroti, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner Sh. Subhash Chander s/o Sh. Chetan Dass of CS No.98pending before the learned ADJ-01, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi assails the impugned order dated 11.07.2018 filed by the petitioner herein as plaintiff for the said suit vide which the application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as amended filed by the petitioner i.e. the plaintiff of the said suit was partially allowed with observations to the effect : - 6. In view of my aforesaid observation, the application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC is allowed only to the extent...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »