Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 48 of about 755 results (0.011 seconds)Bhumika Mohan Jaisinghani and Anr. Vs.registrar of Marriage and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 128/2019 & CM APPL.660/2019 BHUMIKA MOHAN JAISINGHANI AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Jai Bansal, Advocate. Versus REGISTRAR OF MARRIAGE AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC GNCTD with Mr Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER1401.2019 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, 1. praying that respondents be directed to issue a handwritten or typed certificate of marriage in respect of their marriage.2.... Petitioner no.1 is a Canadian Citizen and petitioner no.2 is a British Citizen. Both the petitioners are working with the British High Commission, New Delhi since 19.02.2017.3. There is no controversy that the marriage of two foreign citizens can be registered under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (hereafter the Act) and the petitioners were married in terms of the Act. However, the certificate of their marriage has not be...
Tag this Judgment!Pawan Malhotra & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 14, 2019 CRL.M.C. 134/2019 & Crl.M.As. 619-620/2019 SH. PAWAN MALHOTRA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Tanzeem Husain, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Jeetendra Singh, P.S. Subhash Place Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.501/2017, under Sections 308/3of IPC registered at police station Subhash Place, Delhi is sought on the basis of second respondents affidavit of 18th December, 2018 (Annexure P-5) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. that to inadvertence, the name of respondent No.2 is incorrectly mentioned as Shyam whereas his name is Sayam and amended memo of parties has been placed on record. Learned petitioners submits counsel for due Upon notice, Mr. M.S. Oberoi, learned Additiona...
Tag this Judgment!Suraj vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 01.2019 CRL. REV. P. 1143/2018 SURAJ STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Mayank M. Mukherjee, Adv. (DHCLSC) For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Durgadas CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 49858/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL. REV. P. 1143/2018 & Crl. M.A. 49859-60/2018 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 06.06.2018 whereby charges have been framed against the petitioner.... Petitioner also impugns order dated 17.11.2016 whereby the claim of the juvenility of the petitioner was rejected by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the trial court Page 1 of 8 2. CRL. REV. P. 1143/2018 had erred in framing a charge and treating the petitioner as a major and has further erred in relying on the m...
Tag this Judgment!Thomson Reddy vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:14. h January, 2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2515/2018 THOMSON REDDY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Joseph Aristotle S and Mrs. Priya Aristotle, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State Mr. Gautam Dhanua and Mr. Rakesh Chehar, Advocates for the complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Allegations were made against the petitioner in the first information report (FIR) no.491/2018, registered by police station Prashant Vihar on 06.10.2018, by M/s. Gold Plus Glass Industry Ltd., a company in which the petitioner was employed during the relevant period as Purchase-Head. It is alleged that he indulged in certain acts of omission or commission mis-using his official position so as to cause wrongful loss to the employer company by way of cheating, Bail appln.25Page 1 of 3 such loss, as per the initial calculations being on account of the company having been over bil...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Om Prakash Chopra & Ors. Vs.state Bank of India
Court: Delhi
$~J * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:14. 01.2019 CS(OS) 1247/2008 SHRI OM PRAKASH CHOPRA & ORS. Plaintiffs Through Mr.J.S.Bakshi and Mr.A.S.Bakshi, Versus Advs. STATE BANK OF INDIA .Defendant Through Mr.Sanjeev Kakra and Mr.Bheem Sain Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This suit has been filed for recovery of possession of immovable property, damages, by way of compensation and for mesne profits/compensation pendente lite and future.2. The case of the plaintiffs is that they are the co-owners of the property No.7, Community Centre, Friends Colony, measuring 222.96 sq.mts. The defendant is a body corporate engaged in the business of banking. It is pleaded that w.e.f. 1.4.2002 defendant bank occupied portion of the plaintiffs above described property consisting of an area of 5742 sq. ft. scattered on various floors of the above property being basement area, ground floor, mezzanine at a monthly rent of Rs.3,50,000/- per...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Ahsan@shakeel vs.state (Govt of Nct) of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 14, 2019 CRL. M.C. 2363/2018 MOHD AHSAN @ SHAKEEL .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Nasimuddin, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor with SI Santosh Mr. Nasib Siddiqui, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 8399/2018 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL. M.C. 2363/2018 Quashing of FIR No.376/2011, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC registered at police station New Usmanur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 31st January, 2018. Notice. Ms. Neelam Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Nasib Siddiqui, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for CRL. M.C. 2363/2018 respondent State Page 1 of 4 submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is com...
Tag this Judgment!Subhash Narula vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~7 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:14. h January, 2019 CRL.M.C. 898/2016 and Crl. M.A Nos.3759/2016 and 8080/2018 SUBHASH NARULA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rohit Puri and Mr. J.Rajesh, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with SI Amit Dutt Mr. Naresh Sharma, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Raman Narula, son of the petitioner herein, was married to Himani (complainant) i.e. the second respondent, on 02.03.2006. A female child was born out of the said wedlock on 29.11.2006. The marriage of the said persons ran into rough weather, the second respondent and her daughter leaving the house of Raman on 18.01.2007. Eventually, the second respondent lodged certain cases against her husband, he, in turn, suing her for divorce by filing a petition before the Family Court. Crl. M.C. No.898/2016 Page 1 of 6 2. While the said petition was pending adjudication, t...
Tag this Judgment!Dalip Singh @ Langda vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 01.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1312/2018 DALIP SINGH @ LANGDA versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Akshay Kumar Verma and Mr. Rattan Singh, Advs. For the Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.108/2015 under Sections 20/of the NDPS Act, Police Station Crime Branch.2. The case of the prosecution is that source information was received on 21.07.2015 that one Parvez, a resident of Bihar along with one Manoj bring Ganja in a truck and sell the same to several people. It was informed that Parvez would be bringing Ganja and would be supplying the same to one Javed. Based on the source information, a raiding party was prepared, 3. BAIL APPLN. 1312/2018 Page 1 of 6 raid was co...
Tag this Judgment!Blueberry Books & Ors vs.bharti Goyal & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:14. 01.2019 CS(OS) 1498/2014 BLUEBERRY BOOKS & ORS Through: Mr. Ashwin Kumar DS, Adv. ..... Plaintiffs Versus BHARTI GOYAL & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr. Satyam Thareja, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.2378/2015 1. This application is filed by defendant No.1 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint and dismissal of the suit.2. The present suit is filed by the plaintiffs seeking a decree of declaration that the plaintiffs are the owners of the copyright in the work Eight Science Olympiad Books Parts 1-8 as per the agreement dated 20.12.2012. A decree of declaration is also sought that the plaintiffs are the owners of the copyright in the work Maths Olympiad Parts 1-6. A decree of permanent injunction is also sought to restrain the defendants from interfering or disturbing the peaceful sale or publication or in any manner exploiting the copyright in the said w...
Tag this Judgment!Subhash Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 14, 2019 CRL.M.C. 141/2019 SUBHASH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocate Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Manveer, P.S. Gokul Puri, Delhi. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.298/16, under Sections 323/452/5of IPC registered at police station Gokul Puri, Delhi is sought on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent Nos.2 & 3, present in the Court, and they have been identified to be so by ASI Manveer on the basis of identity proof produced by them. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, present in the Court, submits that the CRL. M.C. 141/2019 Page 1 of 4 dispute between the parties has been amic...
Tag this Judgment!