Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 43 of about 755 results (0.019 seconds)Rakesh Etc. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 298/2004 Reserved on :28. 11.2018 Date of Decision :15. 01.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: RAKESH ETC. STATE Through : Mr. H. P. Aditya, Advocate. Versus Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. ..... Appellants ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.1. The present appeal arises out of the judgment on the conviction dated 24.03.2004 and the order on the sentence dated 27.03.2004 in Sessions Case Nos. 03/2003 and 68/2003 in FIR No.604/2002 under Sections 498A/304B, P.S. Uttam Nagar registered at the instance of the complainant, Bhure Ram, father of the deceased, Anju.2. Appellant No.1 Rakesh, is the husband of the deceased, appellant No.2 Ram Lakhan, is the father-in-law of the deceased, appellant No.3 Raj Kumar, is the brother-in-law (jeth) of the deceased, appellant No.4 Somwati (wife of appellant No.3) is the jethani of the deceased and the appellant No.5, Somwati (wife of appe...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Samim vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 2026/2017 Date of Order: January 16, 2019 MOHD SAMIM STATE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Rekha Aggarwal, Mr. Arun Tiwari and Ms. Sugandha Agarwal, Advocates versus .....Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State Mr. Nikhil Goel and Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner seeks bail 365/364A/387/420/511/468/471 of Vasant Kunj North, New Delhi. in FIR No.523/2016 under Sections registered at police station IPC, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that as per status report on record, the investigation of this case was handed over to CBI and after completion of investigation, a closure report has been filed by the CBI.s Copy of the closure report has been handed over and is taken on record. BAIL APPLN. 2026/2017 Page 1 of 2 It is stated that the matter is now coming up before the tr...
Tag this Judgment!R vs.d
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgement:15. h January, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 322/2018 R D ..... Appellant Through Mr. Mohit Monga, Advocate for the in appellant along with appellant person. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Abhishek Agarwal, Advocate for the respondent along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 31.08.2018 passed by the Family Court, by which the Family Court has granted three months time to the respondent/husband to clear the arrears of maintenance amounting to Rs.5,60,000/- as on September, 2018. The Family Court in its order has also noticed that an earlier cheque for an amount of Rs.50,000/- was returned unpaid. The complaint of the appellant/wife is that the appellant is finding it difficult to bring up two small MAT.APP.(F.C.) 322/2018 Page 1 of 3 children with the amount of maintenance fixed and whi...
Tag this Judgment!Mahinder Kumar & Ors vs.bal Kishan & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.329/2017 * + % MAHINDER KUMAR & ORS15h January, 2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Om Parkash Verma, Advocate (Mobile No.9810031582). versus BAL KISHAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Parnil Yodha, Advocate for R-1 to 9 (Mobile No.9810918714). Mr. Mohit Verma, Advocate for R-10 to 17 (Mobile No.9650320191). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.329/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.11526/2017 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiffs in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 01.12.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for partition filed by the appellants/plaintiffs as being barred by res judicata in view of the RFA No.329/2017 Page 1 of 6 judgment dated 09.09.1969 passed by a ld. Single Judge of this Court in CS(OS) No.510/1966 and an appeal again...
Tag this Judgment!Raja vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~1 to 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 960/2018 Judgment delivered on:15. 01.2019 JITENDER versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1204/2018 RAJA versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1208/2018 RAMESH CHAUHAN versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1229/2018 SONU THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Ashwini Kumar, Mr. Pawan Kumar and Ms. Garima Verma, Advs. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State with SI Bharat Singh BAIL APPLN. 960/2018 & OTHER CONNECTED MATTERS Page 1 of 3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1501.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.93/2018 under Sections 354/354-B/323/506/5of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Stat...
Tag this Judgment!The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 vs.geetanjali Credits and C ...
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.74/2017 Reserved on :1. t August, 2018 Date of decision:15. h January, 2019 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 .....Appellant Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus GEETANJALI CREDITS AND CAPITAL LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kamal Ahuja and Mr. Sameer Srivastava, Advocates. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.75/2017 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 .....Appellant Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus GEETANJALI CREDITS AND CAPITAL LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kamal Ahuja and Mr. Sameer Srivastava, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.: The above captioned appeals by Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) in the case of M/s Geetanjali Credits and Capital Limited, formerly known as Shubh International Limited ('respondent- assessee' for short), relate to Assessment Years 1999-2000 and 2000-01 a...
Tag this Judgment!Mst. Shahnaz Begum vs.mohd. Naseem & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :13. h December, 2018 Date of decision :15th January, 2019 + O.M.P. 1405/2014 MST. SHAHNAZ BEGUM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil K. Khaware & Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocates (M-9810027839) versus MOHD. NASEEM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Mr. C.K. Bhatt & Mr. Bilal Ali, Advocates for R-1, 6, 7 to 9, 11, 18, 19, 20, 24 & 25 (M-9811555971). Mr. Vishnu Mehra & Mr. Garva Dhyani, Advocates for R-2 to 5, 10, 12, 22 & 23 (M-9811059674) Mr. Anand Jha, Advocate for R-13 to 17 (M-98101476840). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present petition by Mst. Shahnaz Begum has been preferred under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for termination of the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator, Sh. L.N. Malik, Chartered Accountant, and seeks substitution of the said Arbitrator. The prayers sought in the present petition are as under:-"In the light of...
Tag this Judgment!Anand & Associates & Ors. Vs.jugal Kisore Jain
Court: Delhi
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 15, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3158/2017 CRL.M.C. 3159/2017 CRL.M.C. 3160/2017 CRL.M.C. 3410/2017 ANAND & ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Akshay Bhatia and Mr. Avinash Das, Advocates. Versus JUGAL KISHORE JAIN RISHI PRAKASH JAIN ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. N.K. Aggarwal and Ms. Priya Pachouri, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is sought is informed that Notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. has been already framed and petitioners have also given their defence. in these petitions on merits. It Since petitioners have an efficacious remedy to assail the Notice framed under Section 251 of Cr.P.C., the inherent extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is not being invoked, with liberty to petitioners to assail the Notice framed under Section 251 of Cr.P.C. before the Revisional Court ...
Tag this Judgment!Coastal Andhra Power Limited vs.andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribut ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO (OS) No.272/2012 Reserved on: Date of decision:15. h January, 2019 17th December, 2018 COASTAL ANDHRA POWER LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rishi Aggarwal, Ms.Gunika Agarwal, Gupta, Ms.Parminder Singh with Mr.Lalltaksh Joshi, Advs. Mr.Mahesh versus ANDHRA PRADESH CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION CO LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.R.K. Sharma with Mr.Nishant, Adv. for R1 to 4. Mr.Arunav Patnaik with Ms.Shikha Saha, Advs. for R5 to 9. Mr. Pankaj K. Mishra, Adv. for R10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.By way of the present appeal, the appellant Coastal Andhra Power Limited impugns order dated 02.07.2012 made in OMP No.267 of 2012 whereby an earlier interim order dated 20.03.2012 has been vacated. By order dated 20.03.2012 the respondents had in effect been FAO(OS) No.272/2012 page 1 of 21 restrained from encashing cert...
Tag this Judgment!Rekha Rani vs.sudhir Kumar Khanna & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.REV.P. 622/2018 Judgment delivered on:15. 01.2019 versus REKHA RANI Advocates who appeared in this case: SUDHIR KUMAR KHANNA & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Sunita Arora, Adv. along with... Petitioner in person. For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Ashish Dhingra, Adv. for R-1 with respondent No.1 in person. JUDGMENT1501.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks to impugn order dated 04.05.2018 and further seeks transfer of the pending proceedings from the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate.2. It is contended by the petitioner, who appears in person, that the impugned order is not sustainable and has incorrectly imposed cost on the petitioner and also returned a finding that the petitioner is seeking to delay the proceedings.... Petitioner submits that the petitioner was only endeavouring to 3. CRL.REV.P.622/2018 Page 1 of 7 ensure that th...
Tag this Judgment!