Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 41 of about 755 results (0.018 seconds)M/S Sreddy Infratech Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Overseas Infrastructure Alliance ( ...
Court: Delhi
$~4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 196/2018 M/S SREDDY INFRATECH PVT LTD Date of Judgment:16. h January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Geetanjali Mohan, Mr. Ashish Versus Mohan, Mr. Akshit Mago & Mr. Shashwat Panda, Advocates. M/S OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PVT LTD Through: Mr. Manish Sharma & Mr. Ninad ..... Respondent Dogra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Division and Commercial Disputes Act, 2015 read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Rules and Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The prayer is to set aside the judgment and order dated 01.06.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which the majority arbitral award dated 03.02.2018 has been upheld and the objections have been dismissed.2. The necessary facts required to be noticed for disposal of this appeal a...
Tag this Judgment!Akhil Delhi Prathmik Shikshak Sangh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12133/2016 % 1. AKHIL DELHI PRATHMIK SHIKSHAK SANGH Through: Mr. P.S. Sridhar Raj, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SC-North DMC/R-1 with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan and Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. Mr. Rakesh Mittal, SC-SDMC with Ms.Yamini Mittal, Adv. for R-2/SDMC Mr. G.D. Mishra, EDMC/R-5 SC- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed by an organisation going by the moniker Akhil Delhi Prathmik Shikshak Sangh, which purports to be a society, registered under the Societies Registration Act, comprising, inter alia, various teachers of schools run by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and espousing their cause.2. The writ petition ventilates a grievance against devolution, on teachers in government schools, of duties which are not linked to education, specifically opening of bank a...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Kumar Singh vs.crane Operator Raj Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1859/2016 and Crl. M.A. 7885/2016 AJAY KUMAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Saini, Advocate versus CRANE OPERATOR RAJ KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had filed a criminal complaint (CC no.53/11) alleging offences punishable under Sections 166, 176, 379, 427, 120 B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) having been committed by the first to seventh respondents. The allegations, in a nutshell, were that he is the registered owner of a bus bearing registration no.DL-1PB3581(bus) which had been illegally impounded on 11.01.2011 from the area of Bihari Colony Bus Stand by the first and third respondents even though the petitioner had due authorization to park the vehicle on the roadside, he having paid the municipal charges (parking fee). He alleged that the manner in which the vehic...
Tag this Judgment!Rohit vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 01.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1100/2018 ROHIT STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr.Faheem Alam, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP. JUDGMENT1601.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.41/2018 under Sections 3of the IPC, Police Station Neb Sarai, Delhi.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the complainant along with his friend Sharif were walking towards his house when he saw co- accused beating a boy and when they tried to intervene, two boys came along with rods in their hands and started beating them and soon thereafter one more person alongwith the petitioner came with sticks and started beating the complainant and his friend and on account of the beatings injuries were sustained by the complainant as well as his friend. As per the...
Tag this Judgment!The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sh. Vikas Bhasin and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + FAO4452018 & CM APPL. 39418/2018 Sh. SUKESH TYAGI S/o- Sh. J.N. Tyagi R/o-WZ-4A, Village Keshopur Vikas Puri, New Delhi. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aman Bhalla, Mr. Navneet Thakran, Mr. Abhimanyu Pedhu and Mr. Aditya Awasthi, Advocates. versus Sh. VIKAS BHASIN S/o- Sh. Virender Kumar Bhasin R/o- H. No.31, Pocket B8 Sector-3 Rohini, Delhi-110085 ..... Respondent No.1 Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate with Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Through its Delhi Regional Office-I F-14, Connaught Circus New Delhi 110001 ..... Respondent No.2 Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate with Pavan Kumar Vashishth, Mr. Advocate. + MAC.APP. 217/2017 & CM APPL. 9116/2017 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. FAO4452018, MAC. APP. 217/2017, MAC. APP. 969/2017 Page 1 of 7 Through its Delhi Regional Office-I F-14, Connaught Circus New Delhi 110001 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate with Pava...
Tag this Judgment!Adarsh Kumar Khera vs.kewal Kishan Khera and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16th January, 2019 + O.M.P. 643/2007, CRL.M.As. 13622/2015, 2073/2017, I.A. 10911/2016, 12188/2016, 15856/2016, 1557/2017, 1562/2017 & 559/2019 ADARSH KUMAR KHERA Through: Ms. ........ Petitioner Isha Aggarwal, Mr. Akhil Jain, and Mr. Sachin Sharma Advocates. (M:9810793583) versus KEWAL KISHAN KHERA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Advocate for R-1 with Respondent No.1 in person. (M:9811156437) Mr. A.K. Vashishtha, Advocate for R- 2 with Respondent No.2 in person. (M:9810008639) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 (The Act) has been filed challenging the arbitral Awards dated 13th July, 2007, 12th May, 2007 and 28th May, 2007, which are collectively annexed as Annexure-P-2 to the petition. There is also a fourth Award dated 8th June, 2007 which was also passed by the learned Sole Arbitra...
Tag this Judgment!Madan Mohan Sharma & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 16, 2019 CRL.M.C. 187/2019 & Crl.M.A.803/2019 MADAN MOHAN SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional .....Respondents PublicProsecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Amit Rana Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.370/2017, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Swaroop Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 2nd July, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Amit Rana on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute CRL.M.C. 187/2019 Page 1 of 4 between the parties has bee...
Tag this Judgment!Chittaranjan Sahu & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d December, 2018 Pronounced on: January 16, 2019 W.P.(C) 7154/2017 CHITTARANJAN SAHU & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Varun Pathak, Mr. Farman Ali and Mr. Kunal Bhargava, Advocates for R-UOI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1... Petitioners who retired as Sergeants from Indian Air Force have been denied re-employment/up-gradation to the rank of Sub Inspector/ Junior Aircraft Mechanic (SI/JAM) in BSF. Aggrieved with the deprival, they have approached this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and inter-alia seek writ of certiorari for quashing the rejection orders issued by... RESPONDENTS. Factual background 2.... Petitioners No.1 to 7 were enrolled with Indian Air Force (hereinafter referred to as IAF) w.e.f 10.07.1987, 02.03.1989, 12.08.1989, 13.1...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Sukesh Tyagi vs.sh. Vikas Bhasin and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + FAO4452018 & CM APPL. 39418/2018 Sh. SUKESH TYAGI S/o- Sh. J.N. Tyagi R/o-WZ-4A, Village Keshopur Vikas Puri, New Delhi. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aman Bhalla, Mr. Navneet Thakran, Mr. Abhimanyu Pedhu and Mr. Aditya Awasthi, Advocates. versus Sh. VIKAS BHASIN S/o- Sh. Virender Kumar Bhasin R/o- H. No.31, Pocket B8 Sector-3 Rohini, Delhi-110085 ..... Respondent No.1 Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate with Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Through its Delhi Regional Office-I F-14, Connaught Circus New Delhi 110001 ..... Respondent No.2 Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate with Pavan Kumar Vashishth, Mr. Advocate. + MAC.APP. 217/2017 & CM APPL. 9116/2017 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. FAO4452018, MAC. APP. 217/2017, MAC. APP. 969/2017 Page 1 of 7 Through its Delhi Regional Office-I F-14, Connaught Circus New Delhi 110001 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate with Pava...
Tag this Judgment!Hans Raj vs.darshan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~16 & 17. * + % W.P.(C) 3081/2015 & C.M. No.5515/2015 Date of Decision:16. 01.2019 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC CO-OPERATION & CHILD DEVELOPMENT & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjiv Joshi, Advocate for petitioner No.1/ NIPCCD. versus DARSHAN & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.1/ Darshan. Mr. L.R. Khatana, Advocate for respondent No.2/ Hansraj. % W.P.(C) 4794/2015 & C.M. No.8666/2015 HANS RAJ ........ Petitioner DARSHAN & ORS Through: Mr. L.R. Khatana, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.1/ Darshan. Mr. Sanjiv Joshi, Advocate respondent/ NIPCCD. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C.) Nos. 3081/2015 & 4794/2015 Page 1 of 9 1. These are two writ petitions preferred by the petitioner National Institute of Public Co-operation & Child Development (NIPCCD) [W.P.(C.) No.3...
Tag this Judgment!