Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 40 of about 755 results (0.007 seconds)Kamlesh Sharma & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 01.2019 CRL.REV.P. 332/2017 & Crl. M.A. 7397/2017 KAMLESH SHARMA & ORS STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Sinha and Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State Mr. Umesh Singh, Adv. for complainant/R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 06.01.2017 whereby the application of the petitioner under Section 125 Cr. P.C. has been rejected. Application of petitioner No.2 and 3, daughter and son of the parties were rejected solely on the ground that they are major.2. It is an admitted position that the subject application was filed on 06.07.2013. The date of birth of petitioner No.3 i.e. son is 27.09.1996 which makes him less than 18 years on the date of the presentation of the application. The a...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Matrix Infosoft Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Planman Tehnologies (India) Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:16. h January, 2019 FAO(OS) 07/2019 & CM. No.1695/2019 and 1696/2019 M/S MATRIX INFOSOFT PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod B. Agarwala, Adv. with Mr. Anuj P. Agarwala, Adv. versus M/S PLANMAN TEHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PVT LTD Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM. No.1695/2019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 07/2019 1. This appeal has been filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short Act) challenging the order dated November 28, 2018 of the learned Single Judge dismissing the petition under Section 34 of the Act challenging the Award dated October 08, 2015. FAO (OS) 07/2019 Page 1 of 16 2. The brief facts are, the appellant, who, is the owner of the premises described as: Plot Nos. A-4 and A-29, Sector 9, Noida, admeasuring 1600 square meters, w...
Tag this Judgment!Narender Kumar vs.the District and Sessions Judge-I and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ R-12AA and R-12AB * + W.P.(C) 3245/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 01.2019 NEERAJ KUMAR SANGWAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr. R.K.Saini, Adv. versus THE DITRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-I AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through None + W.P.(C) 3253/2012 NARENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. R.K.Saini, Adv. versus THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-I AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Since the issue is same in both the petitions, therefore, these petitions are being disposed of vide this common order.2. Vide the present petitions, the petitioners seek direction thereby W.P.(C) 32and 32Page 1 of 9 quashing the action of the respondents in calculating the marks of the petitioners in re-typing test by applying wrong methods and evaluate the same in an arbitrary and unjust manner, consequently declare him unsuccessful by granting only 16 marks to the petitioner in WP(C) No.3245/2012 an...
Tag this Judgment!Govind Ram vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4419/2016 Decided on:16. h January, 2019 GOVIND RAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.P. Aggarwal and Mr. Himanshu, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved and has approached this court invoking its inherent power and jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) as his criminal complaint (CC15751/09) was dismissed by the Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 08.10.2013, the revisional challenge to the said decision in the court of Sessions (by petition CR992013) also having failed on 08.04.2016.2. The documents placed on record, as highlighted also by the pleadings and submissions, indicate that the complaint case of the petitioner has not been appropriately dealt with in accordance with Crl. M.C. No.4419/2016 Page 1 of 6 law, the issues raised having bee...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.vinod Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:16. h January,2019 + MAC.APP. 805/2018 & CM APPLs. 36570/2018, 36572/2018 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ...Appellant Through: Mr. Animesh Sinha, Advocate. versus VINOD KUMAR (INJURED) S/o Chiranji Lal, R/o 16/412, I-Block, Gali No.5, Bapa Nagar, Pyare Lal Road Karol Bagh, New Delhi. Respondent no.1 SHYAM SINGH (DRIVER) S/o Sh. Lek Raj, R/o 101, Village Budhpur PO Alipur, Delhi-110036. Respondent no.2 DELHI TRANSPORT CO. (OWNER) CW-1, K CAMP, B.B. Marg, New Delhi. ... Respondent no.3 Through: Mr. Rahul Rohtagi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA MAC.APP.805/2018 & CM APPLs. 36570/2018, 36572/2018 Page 1 of 8 I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the award in MACT Case No.3579dated 30.05.2018 passed by the Judge MACT-1 (Central), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (hereinafter called as "The Tribunal") whereby the compensation of Rs.20,54,000/- alongwith simple interest of 9% p.a. on the total compensati...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Bharat Sharma vs.ram Kishore Sharma
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.288/2017 + % RAM BHARAT SHARMA16h January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit K. Nain and Mr. Gagandeep Sharma, Advocates (9911002144) versus RAM KISHORE SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.1774/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions CM stands disposed of. CM Nos. 1776/2019 (delay in filing the review petition) & 1777/2019 (delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delays in filing and re- filing the review petition are condoned. RFA No.288/2017 Page 1 of 7 CMs stand disposed of. Review Petition No.14/2019 (filed against the order dated 18.09.2018) 1. This appeal was disposed of by a Consent Order, in the presence of the appellant, on 18.09.2018, and this Order dated 18.09.2018 reads as under: CM No.38111/2018 (for waiving of cost) 1. There is no opposition to this application whic...
Tag this Judgment!Ramnath Yadav & Anr. Vs.vandana Garg
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RAMNATH YADAV & ANR. Through: RFA No.28/2019 16th January, 2019 ..... Appellants Sh. Praveen Agarwal, Advocate (M. No.9811702850) & Sh. Ravinder Tyagi, Advocate (M. No.9873324300). VANDANA GARG versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE SH. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat No.34/2019 1. No one appears for the caveator. Caveat accordingly stands discharged. C.M. No.1664/2019(exemption) 2. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.28/2019 and C.M. Nos. 1663/2019 (stay) & 1665/2019 (under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC) RFA No.28/2019 Page 1 of 12 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant nos.1 and 2 in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 12.10.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for possession and mesne profi...
Tag this Judgment!Rajender vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 2623/2018 Judgment delivered on:16. 01.2019 RAJENDER STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Pramod Kumar and Mr.Shavaj Khan, Advs. Ms.Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ramesh, P.S.Mundka. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1601.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.236/2017 under Sections 323/376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Mundka.2. It is alleged that the prosecutrix has filed a complaint alleging that she was a resident in the house of the petitioner and for the last about three months he was pressing her to make physical relationship which she was declining. On the date of the incident it is alleged that he forcibly committed the offence of rape on her.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has BAIL ...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Gupta & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 16, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4583/2018 & CRL.M.A. 31741/2018 RAJESH GUTPA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal and Mr. Manish Sahni, Advocates STATE & ANR. Versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with Inspector Anil Kumar Mr. Sanjeev Singh and Ms. Anandita Singh, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.26/2013, under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC, registered at police station Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Agreement of 15th March, 2016 reached between the parties. Notice. Ms. Neelam Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State and Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2, accept notice. CRL.M.C. 4583/2018 Page 1 of 4 Learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant submits that in view of the communication of 31st May, 2016 (An...
Tag this Judgment!Vikas Bhasin vs.the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. And Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + FAO4452018 & CM APPL. 39418/2018 Sh. SUKESH TYAGI S/o- Sh. J.N. Tyagi R/o-WZ-4A, Village Keshopur Vikas Puri, New Delhi. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aman Bhalla, Mr. Navneet Thakran, Mr. Abhimanyu Pedhu and Mr. Aditya Awasthi, Advocates. versus Sh. VIKAS BHASIN S/o- Sh. Virender Kumar Bhasin R/o- H. No.31, Pocket B8 Sector-3 Rohini, Delhi-110085 ..... Respondent No.1 Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate with Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Through its Delhi Regional Office-I F-14, Connaught Circus New Delhi 110001 ..... Respondent No.2 Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate with Pavan Kumar Vashishth, Mr. Advocate. + MAC.APP. 217/2017 & CM APPL. 9116/2017 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. FAO4452018, MAC. APP. 217/2017, MAC. APP. 969/2017 Page 1 of 7 Through its Delhi Regional Office-I F-14, Connaught Circus New Delhi 110001 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate with Pava...
Tag this Judgment!