Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 34 of about 755 results (0.022 seconds)Narotam Pradhan vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 01.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2292/2018 NAROTAM PRADHAN STATE OF NCT OF DELHI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Kundan Kumar, Adv. Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Abdul Barkat, Narcotics Cell, Crime Branch. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1801.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.140/2018 under Sections 20, 25, 29 of the NDPS Act registered at Police Station Crime Branch.2. Allegations in the FIR are that secret information was received that one person would be bringing a truck load of ganja for supply in Delhi. A raiding party was prepared. At the designated spot, one truck BAIL APPLN. 2292/2018 Page 1 of 5 was found. When the truck was intercepted by the raiding party, 175 Kgs of ganja was found.3. The role ascribed to the petitioner is that peti...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Doons Caterers vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h January, 2019. + M/S DOONS CATERERS O.M.P. 1489/2014 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Navin Kumar and Ms. Arpana Majumdar, Advocates. (M:9958893564) versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ranjan Sabharwal, Standing Counsel, UOI. (M:9810072538) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 34 has been filed challenging the 1. Award dated 24th July, 2014 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator.2. M/s. Doons Caterers (hereinafter Caterer) had submitted a quotation for management of on-board catering services in Train No.2483- 84, KCVL-ASR Express from Kochuveli to Amritsar Junction. The Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (hereinafter IRCTC) had called for the said quotation. The terms of the quotation were: - (a) That it was on a purely ad-hoc basis; (b) It was for a period of six months from the date of commencement of service or take over by the...
Tag this Judgment!Bhakhra Beas Management Board (Bbmb) vs.vicky Goel
Court: Delhi
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:18. 01.2019 Tr. P. (C) No.206/2018 BHAKHRA BEAS MANAGEMENT BOARD (BBMB) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Rana, Advocate with Mr. Brijesh Yadav, Officer. Versus VICKY GOEL Through: Respondent in person. ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL By order dated 26.10.2018, the writ petition, being W.P. (C) 1. No.11515/2018, was treated by this court as transfer petition.2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent had filed an appeal under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 challenging the order of eviction dated 07.04.2015 passed by the Estate Officer. The said order dated 07.04.2015 impugned in the said appeal was stayed on 30.04.2015 by the learned District & Sessions Judge (West), Delhi. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that after retirement of Ms. Rekha Rani, learned District & Sessions Judge, West District, Delhi, o...
Tag this Judgment!p.c. Sekhar vs.the New India Assurance Company Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + P.C. SEKHAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17th December,2018 Pronounced on:18th January , 2019 LPA6562015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.C. Sekhar, Appellant-in-person. versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Saurabh Prakash with Mr. Utsav India for New Jain, Advocates Assurance Co. And LPA6572015 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Prakash with Mr. Utsav Jain, Advocates for New India Assurance Co. versus .... Respondent Through: Mr. P.C. Sekhar, Respondent-in- P.C. SEKHAR person. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA LPA6562015& LPA6572015 Page 1 of 32 JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA J.:1. The present appeals under clause X of Letters patent appeal are directed against the common judgment dated 29th July, 2015 whereby the learned Single Judge disposed of Writ Petitions No.3416/2002 and 10209/2009.2. Shri. P.C. Sekhar, the Appellant in LPA No.656/2015 (hereinafter referred t...
Tag this Judgment!Sirajuddin vs.om Prakash & Ors(united India Ins Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
$~30 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. h January, 2019 + MAC.APP. 387/2018 SIRAJUDDIN Through Mr.Varun Sarin, Mr.Aakash Kundra, ..... Appellant versus Advocates. OM PRAKASH & ORS(UNITED INDIA INS CO LTD) Through Mr.Sankar N. Sinha, Advocate ..... Respondent JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.6,03,523/- has been awarded to the appellant. The appellant is seeking enhancement of the award amount.2. The accident dated 30th March, 2017 resulted in the amputation of left limb above the knee of the appellant. The appellant remained hospitalized from 30th March, 2017 to 17th April, 2017. The amputation of left lower limb resulted in 85% permanent disability to the appellant relating to his left lower limb.3. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.2,15,000/- towards the medical expenses, Rs.15,000/- towards conveyance, special diet and attendant charges, Rs.57,408/- towards loss of income during trea...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Imran vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 3026/2018 Judgment delivered on:18. 01.2019 MOHD. IMRAN versus ........ Petitioner STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Surendra Sharma, Crime Branch, Chanakyapuri. Ms. Aakriti Mishra with Mr. Siddharth Joon, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.273/2018 under Sections 25/54/59, Arms Act, Police Station Civil Lines.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner while entering the Chief Ministers Office-cum-Residence was found in possession of a live cartridge which was kept in his wallet.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no conscious possession of the live cartridge and in the absence of conscious possession, an offence under Sections 25/is not made out...
Tag this Judgment!Bara Intercollege vs.deputy Director, Minorities Welfare Department an ...
Court: Delhi
$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 519/2019 & CM Nos. 2433/2019 & 2434/2019 BARA INTERCOLLEGE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Romy Chacko, Advocate. versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, MINORITIES WELFARE DEPARTMENT AND ORS. Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1801.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU,J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 28.11.2018 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions (hereafter the Commission), whereby the petitioners application for minority status was rejected.2. The petitioner claims that the Commission had erred in not appreciating that the petitioner institution was established by one Mrs Nabihan Bibi wife of Late Raja Khan. She was a Muslim widow and had donated land for establishment of a Junior High School. It is submitted that one Mr Tazmal Khan was appointed as a caretaker to manage and administer the school. He had, thereafter...
Tag this Judgment!Savitri Gautam vs.s C Aggarwal (Deceased) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 01.2019 + RFA(OS) 74/2018 & CM No.43620/2018 (Stay) SAVITRI GAUTAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pardeep Dhingra, Mr. Mohit Nandwani and Ms. Hitendra, Advs. Versus S C AGGARWAL (DECEASED) THR LRS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hemant Chaudhri and Mr. Arjun Bhaskar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM No.43619/2018 (delay of 785 days) 1. This is an application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 785 days delay in filing the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant submits that the delay is on account of the fact that the applicant is an illiterate lady, aged 53 years. Her husband is a handicapped person and thus, the appeal could not be filed within the period of limitation. The second ground which has been urged seeking condonation of delay is that post passing of the preliminary decree on 19.07.2016, the matter was refer...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.p.c. Sekhar
Court: Delhi
* + P.C. SEKHAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17th December,2018 Pronounced on:18th January , 2019 LPA6562015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.C. Sekhar, Appellant-in-person. versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Saurabh Prakash with Mr. Utsav India for New Jain, Advocates Assurance Co. And LPA6572015 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Prakash with Mr. Utsav Jain, Advocates for New India Assurance Co. versus .... Respondent Through: Mr. P.C. Sekhar, Respondent-in- P.C. SEKHAR person. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA LPA6562015& LPA6572015 Page 1 of 32 JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA J.:1. The present appeals under clause X of Letters patent appeal are directed against the common judgment dated 29th July, 2015 whereby the learned Single Judge disposed of Writ Petitions No.3416/2002 and 10209/2009.2. Shri. P.C. Sekhar, the Appellant in LPA No.656/2015 (hereinafter referred t...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 01.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.4945/2016 RAJESH KUMAR Joshi, Advs. versus Through: Mr. Padma Kumar & Mr. Amandeep ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra & Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL)... Petitioner is aggrieved of the orders dated 12.02.2016 and 19.04.2016 1. passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench in short, 'CAT', in OA No.3920/2013 and RA No.84/2016 filed by the petitioner, in effect, seeking issuance of the directions to be retained in the cadre of Head Clerk and in the alternative, for grant of due promotion on the post of Loco Pilot (Goods) at par with his juniors, with consequential effect(s). Concisely, the relevant facts are that 2. the petitioner was initially appointed as Apprentice Diesel Asstt. on 09.04.2001 and after completion of his training, ...
Tag this Judgment!