Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 32 of about 755 results (0.009 seconds)Alok Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs.ncct & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h January, 2019 Decided on:21. t January, 2019 + LPA2252017 DR. PRANAB BAISHYA & ORS. Through: Mr.Arunabh ..... Appellants with Mr.Karma Dorjee, Mr.Vaibhav Tomar & Ms.Shruti Choudhry, Advocates. Chowdhary versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI/R1. Mr.J.K.Singh with Mr.Harsh Pandit, Advocates for R2, R4 & R5. LPA2782017 ALOK KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Abhik Kumar with Mr.Siddharth Shankar, Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Mr.Rinku Mathur & Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.K.Singh with Mr. Harsh Pandit, Advocates for R1/NCCT. LPA2882017 NCCT & ANR. + S HEROJIT SINGH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Sapam Biswajit Meitei with Mr. Naresh K.Gaur, Advocates. LPA2252017 & connected matters. Page 1 of 27 versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ripu Daman...
Tag this Judgment!Sachin Gupta vs.rachana Gupta
Court: Delhi
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.REV.P. 476/2018 Judgment delivered on:21. 01.2019 SACHIN GUPTA versus RACHANA GUPTA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjay S. Chhabra with Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocates. Mr. Saurabh Soni with Ms. Mannat Singh, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. Crl.M.A.10920/2018 (for modification of order dated 24.05.2018) Crl.M.A.10158/2018 476/2018 & (stay), 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 13.02.2018, whereby, the application of the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, impugning proceedings initiated by the Respondent under section 125 Cr.P.C. on the ground of territorial jurisdiction, has been rejected.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner in all proceedings except in these proceedings has mentioned her CRL.REV.P. 476/2018 Page 1 of 4 residential add...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Khushi Ram Behari Lal vs.m/s Jaswant Singh Balwant Singh
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 7983/2012 & CM APPL. 19969/2012 M/S KHUSHI RAM BEHARI LAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Kumar and Mr.Vinay Kumar Shukla, Advocates. versus M/S JASWANT SINGH BALWANT SINGH Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.05.2012 passed by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (hereinafter referred to as the Appellate Board), whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner, a partnership firm trading as M/s Khushi Ram Behari Lal (Export Division) comprising of three partners which was established in the year 1978 and has been carrying on the business of processing, marketing and exporting of rice since then. W.P.(C) 7983/2012 Page 1 of 18 The trademark TRAIN BRAND WI...
Tag this Judgment!Anis Ur Rehman vs.mohd. Tahir and Ors
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.855/2018 and C.M. No.43186/2018(stay) % ANIS UR REHMAN Reserved on:15. h January, 2019 Pronounced on:21. t January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.D. Ansari, Advocate with Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocate with appellant in person. MOHD. TAHIR AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Respondent No.6 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 08.05.2018 by which the trial court has rejected the plaint filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on account of the suit filed by the plaintiff being barred under The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 (hereinafter unamended Act). RFA No.855/2018 Page 1 of 12 2. At the outset, it may be noted that the trial court has referred ...
Tag this Judgment!Surender Singh Rawat vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 21, 2019 CRL.M.C. 294/2019 SURENDER SINGH RAWAT & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Udai Raj, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Sanju Rai Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.72/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station CWC/Nanakpura, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 11th January, 2019 of respondent No.2. Izhar Ahmad, Upon notice, Mr. learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sanju Rai on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute with petitioners has been amicably resolved and terms of compromise h...
Tag this Judgment!Integrated Management College vs.manas Raizada
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.44/2019 % INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT COLLEGE21t January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manuj Kumar Garg, Advocate. versus MANAS RAIZADA ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.2469/2019 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.44/2019 and C.M. Appl. No.2468/2019 (for stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 24.09.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff/ RFA No.44/2019 Page 1 of 9 student for a sum of Rs. 6,88,600/- along with interest at 9% per annum on account of appellant/defendant/institute closing midway in the two-year course of Higher National Diploma (hereinafter HND Programme) for EDEXCEL Inter...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Aggarwal vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. t January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4805/2016 and Crl. M.A. 19982/2016 AMIT AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Wani and Ms. Sindhu S., Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with SI Anil Rathod Mr. Jajaj Agarwal and Mr. Atul Agarwal, Advocates for R-2 & 3 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Allegations were made about complicity on the part of the petitioner in certain acts of commission and omission allegedly constituting offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 in the averments set out in the complaint presented on 16.01.2013, to the Station House Officer of police station Greater Kailash-I, it having been translated into first information report (FIR) no.13/2013, the second respondent being the first informant.2. The police carried out investigation and submitted report (charge-shee...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Sehgal vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~41 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. 01.2019 Thakur Sumit, Adv. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 574/2019 RAJ KUMAR SEHGAL Through versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 2577/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 574/2019 The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the 1. order dated 24.08.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench (CAT) in OA No.3015/2016.2. release of The petitioner had preferred the said OA to claim interest on delayed retiral dues. The petitioner was issued a charge-sheet on W.P.(C) 574/2019 Page 1 of 8 25.01.2007, wherein, the following Articles of Charge were framed against him : Article I Shri R.K.Sehgal, while posted as Income-tax Officer, Ward 12 (3), New Delhi, during the period from 06.06.2005 to 31.12.2006, issued n...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay & Ors. Vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar Tripathi, Advocate versus Through: Mr. ....Respondents Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Mohd Faizan, PS Pandav Nagar Respondent No.2 in person. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 21, 2019 * + CRL.M.C. 5069/2017 SANJAY & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) of FIR Quashing No.112/2017, Sections 325/380/448/4of IPC registered at police station Pandav Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 23rd September, 2017 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. under Izhar Ahmad, Upon notice Mr. learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Mohd Faizan, on the basis of identity p...
Tag this Judgment!Bhasin Tobaccos Ltd. & Ors. Vs.gambro Nexim (India) Medical Ltd. & Ors ...
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t January, 2019. CS(COMM) 962/2016, CCP No.128/2013, IA No.20451/2013 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), IA No.2160/2014 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), IA No.13912/2018 (u/O VII R-11 CPC) & IA No.13913/2018 (u/S151CPC) BHASIN TOBACCOS LTD. & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. B.B. Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Gandhi, Ms. Manjula Gandhi, Mr. Aditya Kapoor, Mr. Nawit Suri, Ms. Soumya Sarin & Mr. Himanshu Dubey, Advs. Versus GAMBRO NEXIM (INDIA) MEDICAL LTD. & ORS. ....Defendants Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ananya Bhattacharya, Adv. for D-1 to 3. Mr. Sunil Magon, Adv. for D-4&5. Mr. Ayush Chaudhary, Adv. for Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Adv. for D- 6/Indian Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.13912/2018 of the defendants no.1 to 3 under Order VII Rule 1. 11 of the CPC read with Sections 18 and 34 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks & Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (DRT Act) is for consideration. CS(COMM) No...
Tag this Judgment!