Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 31 of about 755 results (0.019 seconds)Cbi vs.ashok Kumar Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
$~16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. t January, 2019 and Crl. M.A. Nos.15974- CRL.M.C. 3816/2016 15975/2016, and Crl. M.A. 7285-7287/2018 + CBI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocate and Insp. Sushil Dewan, CBI versus ASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The respondent, an officer of Indian Revenue Service (IRS) had been arrested in the course of investigation of certain cases including RC No.S19 E0006 99 EOU-VII/EO-III/CBI (FIR) of the petitioner Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). On conclusion of investigation, report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) is stated to have been filed against him, inter alia, on the strength of sanction for his prosecution. Simultaneously, investigation in the other FIRs was also concluded and criminal cases came up before the court of Special...
Tag this Judgment!In the Matter of Burgundy Tradings Private Limited (In vol.liqn.) Vs.. ...
Court: Delhi
$~CP-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:21. 01.2019 + CO.PET. 1/2019 IN THE MATTER OF BURGUNDY TRADINGS PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN.) ............... Petitioner Through Mr.D.Bhattacharya, Adv for OL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed by the Official Liquidator (OL), under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956, in relation to the Voluntary Liquidation of the company, namely, BURGUNDY TRADINGS PRIVATE LIMITED, which is in pursuance to a request received by him from Ms. Rita Choudhrie, Voluntary Liquidator, so appointed by the said Company.2. The crux of the matter is that the Company, which was in business of trading, import & export of engineering goods, apparels, agriculture products etc., in an Extra Ordinary General meeting held in pursuance to the provisions of section 484(1) of the act, passed a special resolution to wind up its operations and hence dissolve itself, voluntarily, on 12.03.2008. I...
Tag this Judgment!Bhavik Jani vs.state ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 2331/2018 Judgment delivered on:21. 01.2019 BHAVIK JANI STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Walia, Adv. Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Shailender Singh, P.S.Amar Colony. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR203of 2018 under Section 406 of the IPC registered at Police Station Amar Colony, New Delhi.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner had represented to the respondent that he was an employee of Apple Company and convinced the respondent that he would purchase Apple Mobile Phone at discounted rates for him. Respondent is alleged to have given Rs. 1,30,000/- to the petitioner. Thereafter petitioner has failed to either get the mobile phone or refund the money.3. On 04.10....
Tag this Judgment!Wianxx Impex Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.evershine Build Well Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:21. 01.2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 254/2017 WIANXX IMPEX PVT. LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Muneesh Malhotra, Mr.Rajat Bhardwaj & Ms.Sonali Rastogi, Advocates versus EVERSHINE BUILD WELL PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Alok Kumar, Mr.Harish Kumar Garg & Mr.Neeraj Gupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.I.A.No.7356/2017 (condonation of delay) This application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay of 28 days in filing the accompanying petition. It is pleaded that there was delay in removing various objections in filing/re- filing and on seeking instructions/approval from the petitioners as they are under judicial custody since 12.07.2016. The application is allowed and the delay of 28 days in filing the accompanying petition is condoned. OMP (COMM.) 254/2017 & I.A.No.7355/2017(stay) 1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and...
Tag this Judgment!Gurdeep Singh vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 21, 2019 CRL.M.C. 284/2019 & CRL.M.A. 1202/2019 GURDEEP SINGH Through: Mr. Zulfikar Khan, Advocate .....Petitioner STATE & ANR. versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State SI Shamsher Singh Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.under Sections 379 of IPC and Section 135 of The Indian Electricity Act, 2003, registered at police station Jaitpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of No Dues Certificate of 19th November, 2018 (Annexure P-3). Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State and Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate for second respondent, accept notice. Learned counsel for second respondent submits that in view of No Dues Certificate of 19th November, 2018 (Annexure P-3), there is no objection to quashing of this FIR. CRL.M.C. 284/2019 Page 1 of 4 Supreme Court in Parbatbhai ...
Tag this Judgment!Mahatma Mahto vs.new Delhi Municipal Council Palika Kendra, New Delhi
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~40 * + % W.P.(C) 573/2019 MAHATMA MAHTO Date of Decision:21st January, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sakshi Kakkar with Mr. Shakti Singh, Advs. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL PALIKA KENDRA, NEW DELHI Through: Mr. Harsha Peechara, ASC with .....Respondent Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Ms. Vidhi Jain, Ms. Kanika Singh & Ms Sriparna Chatterjee, Advs. for R-1 . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.2576/2019(exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 573/2019 & C.M. No.2575/2019(for interim relief) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 3.10.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No.3035/2018. The Tribunal has disposed of the said original application preferred by the petitioner with the following directions:-"W.P.(C) 573/2019 Page 1 of 7 i) The applicant is...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Bgr Mining and Infra Limited vs.ntpc Limited and Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:21. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 463/2018 and CM Nos. 2006/2018, 11943- 11944/2018, 16245/2018 & 16371/2018 M/S BGR MINING AND INFRA LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus NTPC LIMITED AND ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner :Mr Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr Mohd. Wasay Khan and Ms Filza Moonis, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU :Mr Tushar Mehta, SGI with Mr Puneet Taneja, Ms Shaheen, Ms Laxmi Kumari, Ms Khushboo, Advocates for NTPC. JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the respondent be directed to act in compliance with Clause 23 of the Project Agreement dated 28.11.2017 (hereafter the Project Agreement) entered into between the petitioner and respondent No.1 (hereafter NTPC). The petitioner is, essentially, aggrieved by a W.P.(C) No.463/2018 Page 1 of 20 show cause not...
Tag this Judgment!Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs.regional Provident Fund Commissioner- ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 882/2014, CM No.1774/2014 & 4063-4064/2015 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. Through Mr.J.C. Seth, Adv. with Mr.Balaparameshwari K., Adv. ........ Petitioner versus REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II (EXEMPTION) AND ORS Through Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Arun Bhardwa, Adv. for UOI. Mr.G. Sivabalamurugan, Adv. for R ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 14th November, 2013 passed by the respondent no.1, whereby the petitioner had been directed to secure compliance of all the eligible employees in its EPF Trust, including those engaged by or through the contractors, with or in connection with the work of petitioner/establishment and to report compliance thereto. The petitioner also impugns the notice dated 27th December, 2013, whereunder the petitioner was directed to show cause as t...
Tag this Judgment!Shiv Avtar Tyagi vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 21, 2019 BAIL APP. No.165/2019 & CRL.M.A. 1468/2019 SHIV AVTAR TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akash Nagar and Mr. Siddharth Satija, Advocates versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Pratap Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner is the husband of complainant/first informant of FIR No.218/18, under Sections 498A/406/3of IPC, registered at police station Roop Nagar, Delhi, who seeks pre- arrest bail in this petition while submitting that petitioner has already joined the investigation. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely trapped in this case. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that petitioner is not cooperating in the investigation. Let petitioner appear before the Investigating Officer on 1st February, 2019 at 05:0...
Tag this Judgment!Kuldeep Kaur (Since Deceased) Through Lrs vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~34 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. t January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2297/2018 and Crl. M.A. 8164/2018 KULDEEP KAUR (SINCE DECEASED) Through LRs Through: Mr. Sunil Satyarthi and Mr. Anand Kumar Dubey, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with Insp. A.K. Singh, SHO, CR Park and SI Rajesh Kumar Verma Mr. Vishal Gosain, Mr. N. Ahuja and Mr. M Pathak, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) no.76/2011 was registered by police station Chitranjan Park on 07.04.2011, on the complaint of Mrs. Kuldeep Kaur wife of late Sh. Ajit Singh, she having alleged certain acts of commission and omission having been indulged in by the second respondent (accused), the same constituting offences punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), property bearing no.L-59, Kalkaji, New Delhi being the subject matter of the dispute...
Tag this Judgment!