Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 29 of about 755 results (0.013 seconds)Lalit Batra vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 01.2019 CRL.REV.P. 953/2018 LALIT BATRA versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Rajni Kant, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. Mr. Tarun Shokeen, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 953/2018 & Crl.M.(Bail) 1707/2018 (for suspension of sentence) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 20.10.2018, whereby, the Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner, impugning order of conviction dated 08.05.2017 and has partly modified order on sentence dated 27.05.2017.2.... Petitioner has been convicted of an offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The Trial Court had sentenced the petitioner to simple imprisonment till rising...
Tag this Judgment!Telecommunication Consultants India Ltd vs.next Generation Business Po ...
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 17/2017 Reserved on:12. 10.2018 Date of decision :22. 01.2019 TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD Through: Mr.Ratan ........ Petitioner Singh, Ms.Priyanka Solanki & Mr.Suraj Prakash, Advs. Kumar versus NEXT GENERATION BUSINESS POWER SYSTEMS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.T.S. Ahuja & Mr.Varun S. Ahuja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 23.08.2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator (hereinafter referred to as Impugned Award).2. The Impugned Award allowed the claims of the respondent inter alia towards amounts withheld by the petitioner as deductions, unpaid amount for the last quarter of the Contract period, dues for duration after the contractually stipulated date of completion as well as reimbursement for Bank Guarantee encashed and release of Assured...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Development Authority vs.m/s k.r Builders (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d January, 2019 + O.M.P. 265/2011 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Mr. Rishi Vohra and Ms. Kanika Singh, Advocates. (M:9999498955) versus M/S K.R BUILDERS (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aviral Tiwari and Mr. R. P. Singh, Advocate. (M:9810359150) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) challenges the award dated 29th November, 2010 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator, Justice Usha Mehra (Retd).2. The... Petitioner DDA (hereinafter, DDA) invited tenders for Construction of 630 SFS houses at Vasant Kunj, Sector-E Pkt. 5 & 6 falling in category II & III in Vasant Kunj and 60 SFS houses (36 Cat. III, 24 Cat. II) and 36 s/Garages at Vasant Kunj, Gr. XI. (`Works). The parties entered into contract dated 10th March, 1989. The tot...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Keswani vs.registrar of Companies Delhi & Haryana
Court: Delhi
$~15 & 16 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d January, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4284/2016 and Crl.M.A.17848/2016, 3296/2017, 19366-19367/2017, 35958/2018 UNITECH LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Advocate with Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, & Ms. Adwaita Sharma, Advocates REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES DELHI & HARYANA versus Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC ..... Respondent CRL.M.C. 4285/2016 and Crl.M.A.17851/2016, 3297/2017 SUNIL KESWANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sangram S. Saron, Advocate + + REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES DELHI & HARYANA versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC1 ORDER (ORAL) Section 74 of the Companies Act, 2013, prior to its amendment of 2018, read as under:-"74. Repayment of deposits, etc., accepted before commencement of this Act.-. (1) Where in respect of any deposit accepted by a company before the commencement of this Act, the amount of such deposit or part thereof or any Crl. M.C. No.4284/...
Tag this Judgment!Eko India Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.tejswi Impex Pvt. Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
$~17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"22nd January, 2019 + CRL. M.C. 4377/2016 & Crl.M.A. 18257/2016 EKO INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vinay Kr. Garg, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sumit Roy, Adv. versus TEJSWI IMPEX PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Anurag Kr. Agarwal & Ms. Manasi Bhushan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have been summoned as accused, by order dated 26.08.2016 of the Metropolitan Magistrate, on the criminal complaint (No.1350/2016) instituted by the respondent (the complainant) alleging offence under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) having been committed primarily on the allegation that they had failed to make any payment inspite of the notice of demand dated 20.02.2014, in the wake of dishonor of cheque bearing No.991053 dated 01.02.2014 for Rs. 81 lakhs that had been issued and handed over by them against the account of first petitioner (compa...
Tag this Judgment!Narender Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:22. 01.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2674/2018 + NARENDER KUMAR STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Mehta, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Yogesh Kumar. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of four weeks to obtain proper and specialized medical treatment for his ailment for the ear and nose.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner requires surgery for the said ailment.3. Vide order dated 14.11.2018, Superintendent (Jail) was directed to have the petitioner examined from DDU Hospital with regard to his medical condition. BAIL APPLN. 2674/2018 Page 1 of 3 4. Thereafter, the petitioner was also examined at All India Institute of Medical Sciences. Subsequently, the petitioner had sought directions f...
Tag this Judgment!Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr vs.sh o.p. Sagar
Court: Delhi
$~29 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22.01.2019 W.P.(C) 1185/2018 & CM49442018 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms. Palak Rohmetra & Ms. Aarushi, Advocates versus SH O.P. SAGAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shanker Raju, Mr. Nilansh Gaur & Mr. Karan Chawla, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) The Government of NCT of Delhi has preferred the present writ 1. the order dated 04.10.2016 passed by the Central petition to assail Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA11452015. The petitioner also assails the order dated 31.07.2017 passed in M.A. 945/2017 in the same proceedings. The respondent had preferred the aforesaid Original Application wherein he had assailed the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him. W.P.(C.) No.1185/2018 Page 1 of 8 2. On 20.04.2015, the Tribunal stayed the ...
Tag this Judgment!Unitech Ltd. Vs.registrar of Companies Delhi & Haryana
Court: Delhi
$~15 & 16 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d January, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4284/2016 and Crl.M.A.17848/2016, 3296/2017, 19366-19367/2017, 35958/2018 UNITECH LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Advocate with Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, & Ms. Adwaita Sharma, Advocates REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES DELHI & HARYANA versus Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC ..... Respondent CRL.M.C. 4285/2016 and Crl.M.A.17851/2016, 3297/2017 SUNIL KESWANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sangram S. Saron, Advocate + + REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES DELHI & HARYANA versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC1 ORDER (ORAL) Section 74 of the Companies Act, 2013, prior to its amendment of 2018, read as under:-"74. Repayment of deposits, etc., accepted before commencement of this Act.-. (1) Where in respect of any deposit accepted by a company before the commencement of this Act, the amount of such deposit or part thereof or any Crl. M.C. No.4284/...
Tag this Judgment!Khem Chand vs.bhagwati @ Laxmi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"22nd January, 2019 CRL. M.C. 812/2016 & Crl.M.A. 3423/2016 KHEM CHAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. versus + BHAGWATI @ LAXMI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner and the first respondent were married to each other on 02.12.2000 at Delhi. From out of the said wedlock, the second respondent took birth, she being a minor child in the care and custody of the first respondent. On account of certain circumstances, the first respondent left the matrimonial home with the second respondent on 20.10.2002. She was eventually constrained to file a petition (petition No.912/3/2011) under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate.2. On her application, the Metropolitan Magistrate, by order dated 10.11.2014, directed the petitioner to pay the interim maintenance allowance of Rs. 3,500/- to ...
Tag this Judgment!Surender Singh Deswal vs.dda
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: January 22, 2019 + W.P.(C) 2117/2011 SURENDER SINGH DESWAL Through: Mr. R.K. Saini and Ms.Vivya Nagpal, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus DDA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. AND + W.P.(C) 2396/2011 CHHAVI AGGRAWAL AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Saini and Ms.Vivya Nagpal, Advs. versus DDA Through: Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The writ petitions are filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:-"W.P.(C) No.2117/2011 and connected matter Page 1 of 16 later, being PRAYERS IN W.P.(C) 2117/2011 In the premises aforesaid, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to issue:-"a) A Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the case for perusal; b) A Writ of Certiorari quashing the action of the respondent / DDA in allotting garages to the petitioners in not holding the...
Tag this Judgment!