Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 27 of about 755 results (0.020 seconds)M/S National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Sunway Construction Sd ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :3. d December, 2018 Date of decision :22nd January, 2019 M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA O.M.P. 160/2012 Through: Dr. Maurya Vijay Chandra, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus (M:9999714802) M/S SUNWAY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit George, Mr. Rishabh Dheer, Mr. Swaroop George and Ms. Rajsree Advocates. (M:9910524364) Ajay, CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (`Act) has been filed by the National Highway Authority of India (hereinafter, NHAI) challenging the impugned award dated 3rd October, 2011. The said award was passed by a three-member tribunal by a 2:1 majority.2. The Respondent-Sunway Construction SDN BHD (hereinafter, Contractor), a Malaysian company was awarded the contract for Rehabilitation and upgrading of Km 406.00 to km 449.150 of NH-76 to 4- lane configuration in the...
Tag this Judgment!Sports Station (India) Pvt Ltd vs.sunil Rai @ Suneil Rai
Court: Delhi
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:22. 01.2019 F.A.O.No.24/2019 SPORTS STATION (INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sonal Jain & Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocates. Versus SUNIL RAI @ SUNEIL RAI ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL C.M. No.3061/2019 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. F.A.O. No.24/2019 & C.M. No.3060/2019 (for stay) 1. The impugned order dated 01.10.2018 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-01, South District, Saket, New Delhi, on an application under Order IX Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) bearing M No.27/2015 by which the ex- parte judgment and decree dated 11.09.2013 in Civil Suit No.169/2013 was set aside, is the subject-matter of challenge in the present appeal.2. Learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff/decree-holder has fairly admitted that the proper service of summons upon the FAO No.24/2019 Page 1 of 3 respondent was not ...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh & Ors. Vs.the State ( n.c.t of Delhi ) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 22, 2019 CRL.M.C. 330/2019 & CRL.M.A. 1419/2019 & CRL.M.A. 1420/2019 RAJESH & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. A.N. Tiwari and Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates versus THE STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Kamal Singh Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.202/2016, under Sections 354/3of IPC registered at police station Amar Colony, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 23rd September, 2017 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, Ms. Neelam Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI K...
Tag this Judgment!Harmony Ayurvedic College and Hospital vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 709/2019 & CM APPLs. 3127/2019, 3128/2019 (for exemptions) HARMONY AYURVEDIC COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Swastik Dalai and Mr. Anupam Mishra, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC for R-1 with Mr. Abhishek Kumar Choudhary and Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Advs. Ms. Archana Pathak Dave and Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition seeks a very limited relief, which appears to % 1. be covered in favour of the petitioner, by decisions of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana as well as this Court.2. In view of the nature of the relief involved, issuance of notice and fixing the matter for further hearing would not serve any purpose. Accordingly, after hearing learned counsel for both the parties, I am proceeding to decide the writ petition, with ...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India & Anr. Vs.himmat Singh Chauhan
Court: Delhi
$~35 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 01.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.638/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Mahapatra, Adv. versus HIMMAT SINGH CHAUHAN Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA .....Respondent A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) 1. Instant petition has come to be preferred by the petitioners seeking to set aside the order dated 18.12.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, in short, 'CAT', whereby, the OA No.3140/2016 filed by the respondent for quashing the communication/order dated 12.05.2016, whereby, the allotment of Govt. accommodation of the respondent was cancelled and the consequential orders that came to be passed by the petitioners, was allowed.2. Concisely, the relevant facts are that the respondent, during the course of his employment with the Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change as Steno Gr.-D, was allotted Qtr. No.101, Block-L, Sarojin...
Tag this Judgment!Subodh Kumar vs.dda
Court: Delhi
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5855/2013 & CM No.12910/2013 SUBODH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Verma and DDA Ms. Katyaini, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Monika Tripathy Pandey and Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as DDA) promulgated a scheme for allotment of flats in Delhi, which was titled the New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as NPRS). Applicants, under the said Scheme, were entitled to be allotted flats, as per their priority, for which purpose a priority number was assigned to each applicant.2. The petitioner applied, under the NPRS, for allotment of a flat. In acknowledgment thereof, deposit receipt was issued, by the DDA to the petitioner on 20th September, 1979. Registration certificate, W.P.(C) 5855/2013 Page 1 of 14 registering the petitioner u...
Tag this Judgment!Amul Gabrani & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 22, 2019 CRL.M.C. 322/2019, CRL.M.A. 1398/2019 AMUL GABRANI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Mr. Rishi and Ms. Arti Bansal, Dewan, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector Ram Narayan, EOW/ Delhi Police Mr. Rajiv Sachar, Advocate with AR of Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of F.I.R. No.104/2017, under Sections 406/420/120B of IPC, registered at Police Station EOW, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 15th January, 2019 (Annexure P-3). Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that Mr. Gulshan Kakkar, Authorized Representative of respondent No.2, is present in the Court and he has been identified to be so, by Inspector Ram Narayan on the basis of identity proof produced by him. CRL. M.C. 322/2019 Page 1 of 4 Authorized Rep...
Tag this Judgment!Arun Jain Prop M/S Vishesh Builders vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d January, 2019 ARUN JAIN PROP M/S VISHESH BUILDERS O.M.P. 60/2013 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Advocate. (M:9810959432) versus NEW DELHI MUNICIAPL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Standing Counsel with Mr. Preet Singh Oberoi and Ms. Sneha Jheetay, Advocates. (M:9634441287) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh (Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed challenging the Award dated 23rd August, 2012 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The... Petitioner - Shri Arjun Jain, Prop. M/s. Vishesh Builders (hereinafter Contractor) was awarded the work of Improvement of Footpath at Sikandra Road, Hailey Road, and Mandi House Roundabout and its Channelizers vide agreement No.2/EE(R-1)/2010-11. The stipulated date for commencement of the contract was 12th March, 2010 and the time allowed for completion was 6...
Tag this Judgment!Siddharth Mahajan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 15, 2019 CRL.M.C. 161/2019 & CRL.M.A. 716/2019 SIDDHARTH MAHAJAN & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Shubham Mahajan, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, learned .....Respondents Additional Public Prosecutor with ASI Manoj Kumar Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.811/2014 under Sections 498-A/4of IPC registered at police station Geeta Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 27th June, 2017 (Annexure -C) reached between the parties. Izhar Ahmad, Upon notice, Mr. learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2 is present in the Court and she has been duly identified as the complainant/first- informant of the FIR in question by ASI Manoj Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute CRL.M.C. 161/2019 Page 1 of 4 ...
Tag this Judgment!Amita Giri & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3524/2018 and CM APPL. 13894/2018 AMITA GIRI & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through:... Petitioner in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Anuj Aggarwal, Addl. Standing Counsel with Mr R.A.A. Khan, Advocates for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2201.2019 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. as under: a) b) c) To issue an appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the... RESPONDENTS to grant the benefits attached to NT to which the... Petitioners daughter is legally entitled; To issue an appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the... RESPONDENTS to pay an amount of Rs. 75,00,000/- towards the damages suffered by the... Petitioners at the hands of the... RESPONDENTS. To issue an appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the... RESPONDENTS to p...
Tag this Judgment!