Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 25 of about 755 results (0.010 seconds)Sh. Vicky Khurana & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 23, 2019 CRL.M.C. 340/2019 & CRL.M.A. 1498/2019 SH. VICKY KHURANA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Naiem Jahan Heena, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Subhash Chand Mr. Pradeep Tyagi, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.918/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Geeta Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 7th February, 2018 (Annexure P-3 colly.). Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- is the State submits that complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Subhash Chand on the basis of identity proof produced by her. respondent No.2, present in the Court Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been...
Tag this Judgment!Gx Technology vs.directorate General of Hydrocarbons & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 986/2017 & CM Nos. 4588/2017, 18798/2017, 18799/2017, 44836/2017 GX TECHNOLOGY ........ Petitioner Through Mr Rajiv Nayyar, Senior Advocate with Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr Ajay Bhargava, Mr Jeevan B. Panda, Mr Satish Padhi, Ms Meher Tandon, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HYDROCARBONS & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Abhinav Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2301.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the order dated 1. 25.01.2017 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent no.1 (Directorate General of Hydrocarbons DGH), whereby the petitioner and its associates have been debarred from future business dealings with DGH for a period of three years with effect from 25.01.2017.2. The petitioner is a subsidiary company of ION Geophysical Corporation a company registered under the laws of Texas, USA having it...
Tag this Judgment!Anuj Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 01.2019 BAIL APPLN. 97/2019 ANUJ SINGH ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Advocate. Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail for 20 days in FIR No.61/2018 under Sections 392/397/506/411/120B/34 IPC, Police Station Jama Masjid on the ground of marriage of his sister. As per the petitioner, the functions for marriage are to commence from 28.01.2019 and go on till morning of 30.01.2019.2. Status report has been filed, which has confirmed the factum of marriage. As per the status report, enquiry has revealed that the petitioner is the only male member in the family to look after the BAIL APPLN. 97/2019 Page 1 of 2 arrangements of the marriage of his sister.3. Keeping in view of the totalit...
Tag this Judgment!The Government of Nct of Delhi & Anr. Vs.mukesh Kumar Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. 01.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.12081/2016 & CM APPL. 47735/2016 THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC. versus MUKESH KUMAR SHARMA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shanker Raju, Mr. Nilansh Gaur and Mr. Karan Chawla, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) in short, 1. By the instant writ petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 05.09.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, 'CAT', whereby, OA No.2363/2015 filed by the respondents, seeking amendments in the notifications dated 26.07.2012 and their 08.01.2013 and thereby, appointment as 'Electrical initial appointment to such post with consequential benefits, came to be allowed to the extent of giving directions to the petitioners to disburse the pay and allowances attached to the post of Electrical Inspector, for the p...
Tag this Judgment!Geeta Arora @ Sonu Punjaban vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 67/2019 Judgment delivered on:23. 01.2019 GEETA ARORA @ SONU PUNJABAN ........ Petitioner STATE versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. R.M. Tufail with Ms. Astha, Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Naahid Naasir, Advocates. Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner, by the present petition, seeks interim bail for a period of two months on the ground that the mother of the petitioner has been advised surgery.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mother of the petitioner has been admitted to hospital and surgery is advised for 25.01.2019. The requisite medical documents have been handed over to the Investigating Officer.3. As per the medical report, postoperative recovery period is 15 days. BAIL APPLN. 67/2019 Page 1 of 2 4.... Petitioner was granted interim ba...
Tag this Judgment!Champa & Ors vs.gajender Sawhney & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 880/2016 CHAMPA & ORS Judgment dated:23. d January, 2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr.I.J.S.Mehra, Advocate with Mr.Tabbassur Firdause, Mr.Sashant Mehra, Mr.Rana and Ms.Archana, Advocates versus GAJENDER SAWHNEY & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE ........ RESPONDENTS COMPANY LIMITED) Through: Mr.Dinesh Gaur, Advocate with Mr.Roopak Gaur and Mr.Amrish Kumar, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. Mr.Ramesh Chandra, Advocate with Mr.A.K.Pandey, Advocate for R-4 & R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT1 The appellant Champa claims herself to be the wife of deceased Sh.Santosh who died in a motor vehicle accident. It is alleged that the accident occurred as the offending truck bearing registration No.HR-55-K- 7195 was allegedly driven by Sh.Gajender Sawhney (respondent No.1), in a MAC.APP. 880/2016 Page 1 of 4 rash and negligent manner that took place on 19.09.2012 near Pulia of village Fazilpur, within the jurisdiction of Police Station ...
Tag this Judgment!Brij Mohan Gupta vs.sona Devi (Since Deceased) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.242/2018 + % BRIJ MOHAN GUPTA Through: Mr. 23rd January, 2019 ..... Appellant Subodh K. Pathak, Advocate with Mr. Yash Anand, Advocate, Mr. Adil Alvi, Advocate and Ms. Pranita Shekhar, (M. No.9810025083). Advocate SONA DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) & ORS. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.3108/2019 (for reviving the appeal) 1. This application is allowed and the appeal is revived in view of what is recorded in the order dated 12.03.2018. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.3109/2019 (for additional grounds) RFA No.242/2018 Page 1 of 23 2. This application is allowed and the appellant is allowed to urge additional grounds and additional questions of law especially challenge made to the order of the trial court dated 14.09.2018. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.3110/2019 (exemption) 3. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M...
Tag this Judgment!Hasmat Ali & Ors. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 23, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2981/2018 & CRL.M.A. 10518/2018 HASMAT ALI & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudhir Kumar Ojha, Advocate versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Amit Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.231/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Kalyan Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated Settlement of 12th January, 2017 (Annexure P-2) reached between the parties through Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- is the State submits that complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Amit Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. respondent No.2, present in the Court Respondent No.2, present in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Samira Khatoon vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 22, 2019 CRL.M.C. 251/2019, CRL.M.A. 1075/2019 SAMIRA KHATOON ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Pankaj Kumar, P.S. Shalimar Bagh, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of F.I.R. No.298/2006 under Sections 406/498A r/w Section 34 of IPC registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement (Annexure P-2). respondent No.2, present Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- is the State submits that complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Pankaj Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. in the Court Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably res...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Kumar vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~R-81 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 737/2002 AMIT KUMAR Decided on:23. d January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate for Dr. Surat Singh, Advocate with Appellant in person. Versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Manish Kumar, PS Delhi Cantt. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The appellant was arrested on 10.06.1998 (vide Ex.PW-7/A) during the course of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.194/1998 registered by Police Station Delhi Cantt., for offence under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The FIR (Ex.PW-5/A) had been registered on the basis of complaint (Ex.PW- 3/A) made by his sister Meenakshi (PW-3) on which the Station House Officer (SHO) of Police Station had made endorsement (Ex.PW-12/A). In the FIR, the first informant (PW-3) had reported that her daughter, then aged six years, had gone missing, she raising suspicion about com...
Tag this Judgment!