Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 23 of about 755 results (0.019 seconds)M/S C & C Maritime Pte Ltd vs.advance Surfactants India Ltd
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EX.P. 311/2014 Reserved on:15. 10.2018 Date of decision :24. 01 .2019 M/S C & C MARITIME PTE LTD Through: Mr.Arun ..... Decree Holder and Khosla Mr.K.Gangadharan, Advs. versus Through: Mr.Pankaj ADVANCE SURFACTANTS INDIA LTD.....Judgment Debtor and Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advs. alongwith Mr.Vishal Sharma, AR. Seth CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA EX.APPL.(OS) 233/2015 & 607/2015 1. This petition has been filed under Section 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking enforcement of the Arbitral Awards dated 19.11.2013 and 21.03.2014 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Charter Party Agreement dated 01.12.2011.2. By the Award dated 19.11.2013, the Arbitral Tribunal has awarded an amount of USD19170.05 in favour of the petitioner against its claim for demurrage and a further sum of USD11483.50 towards shifting charg...
Tag this Judgment!Customs Preventive New Customs House Thr. Naresh Kumar, Inspector vs.a ...
Court: Delhi
$~18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2408/2016 CUSTOMS PREVENTIVE NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE THR. NARESH KUMAR, INSPECTOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vineet Sharma, Advocate. versus AJAY KUMAR BANSAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sonam Nagrath, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (CC No.282/1/1993) of the petitioner, the respondent stood summoned as accused by order dated 06.07.1993 of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM), the accusations levelled constituting the offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. It may be mentioned that besides the respondent, one another (Jitender Nath) had also been summoned by the said order, the said other accused having since died and the proceedings against him having abated.2. The complaint dated 30.06.1992 was presented by Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Senior Special Public Prosecutor engaged...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Crocs Inc Usa vs.m/s Aqualite India Ltd & Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:08. 05.2018 Pronounced on:24. 01.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 79/2018 & CM APPL. 17362-65/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ANR ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 80/2018 & CM APPL. 17366-69/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2018 & CM APPL. 17370-73/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus M/S ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 82/2018 & CM APPL. 17374-77/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ANR. FAO(OS)(COMM)No.79/2018 & connected matters ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + FAO(OS) (COMM) 83/2018 & CM APPL. 17378-81/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD. & ANR.... RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 84/2018 & CM APPL. 17382-85/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/ S BATA INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPOND...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Crocs Inc Usa vs.m/s Liberty Shoes Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:08. 05.2018 Pronounced on:24. 01.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 79/2018 & CM APPL. 17362-65/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ANR ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 80/2018 & CM APPL. 17366-69/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2018 & CM APPL. 17370-73/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus M/S ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 82/2018 & CM APPL. 17374-77/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ANR. FAO(OS)(COMM)No.79/2018 & connected matters ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + FAO(OS) (COMM) 83/2018 & CM APPL. 17378-81/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD. & ANR.... RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 84/2018 & CM APPL. 17382-85/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/ S BATA INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPOND...
Tag this Judgment!R vs.m V
Court: Delhi
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:24. h January, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 64/2017 & CM APPL. 13882/2017 R M V ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Tripurari Jha and Mr.Brajesh Kumar, Advocates with appellant in person. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Nitish Sharma, Advocate along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2016 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned order) by which a petition filed by the respondent/husband under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of the marriage on the ground of cruelty and desertion has been allowed on the ground of desertion alone. MAT. APP (F.C.) No.64/2017 Page 1 of 9 2. The marriage between the parties was solemnized as far back as on 28.01.199...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Chugh & Anr. Vs.chhavi Poplai & Ors.
Court: Delhi
6 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1095/2018 & CC(COMM) 48/2018, I.As. 11667/2018, 12286/2018 RAJESH CHUGH & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Nishchal Anand, Advocate. versus CHHAVI POPLAI & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ashish Deep Verma, Advocate. Date of Decision:23. d January, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral) 1. I.A.12286/2018 has been filed under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC on behalf of the defendants No.1 and 2 for vacation of the ex parte ad interim injunction order dated 31st August, 2018 passed by this Court in an application for interim injunction filed by the plaintiffs being I.A. 11667/2018. The relevant portion of the ex parte ad interim injunction order dated 31st August, 2018, is reproduced hereinbelow:-"It is stated that the father of the plaintiffs, late Mr. Amir Chand initially adopted the trademark Nizams, as Karta of the HUF and got the same registered under Classes 29, 30, 32, 33, 24, 42 and 43 of the Trad...
Tag this Judgment!The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 vs.dlf Home Developers Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 01.2019 ITA542019, C.M. APPL.3290/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3..... Appellant Through Counsel. : Sh. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing versus DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LTD ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. Four questions of law are urged by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereafter the 1961 Act].. It is contending that the ITATs decision impugned in these proceedings is erroneous and unsupported by law: (i) with respect to disallowance under Section 14A; (ii) with respect to the claim of expenses incurred for software upgradation and services; (iii) in regard to payment of brokerage expenses, and (iv) with regard to payment made towards IBM and Bharti Airtel for providing computer maintenance and broadband services to the group.2. The assessee, which is a b...
Tag this Judgment!Rishabh Singh vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 23, 2019 CRL.M.C. 345/2019 & CRL.M.As. 1511-12/2019 RISHABH SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Rita Kumar and Ms. Anita Verma, Advocates versus STATE AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Sunil Kumar Mr. Swapnil Vashishtha, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.520/2014, under Sectionsof IPC & under section 3 r/w 181 and u/sof Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, registered at police station Govind Puri, Delhi is sought on the ground that the accident in question had taken place due to bona fide error of judgment. Upon notice, Ms. Neelam Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sunil Kumar, on the basis of identity pr...
Tag this Judgment!National Highways Authority of India vs.progressive Construction Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. 1.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shubham Saxena, Advocate. O.M.P. (COMM) 13/2018 + NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTION LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Swaroop George with Ms. Omana George, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed on behalf of National Highways Authority of India (hereafter referred to as NHAI) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act). Mr. Shubham Saxena, who appears on behalf of NHAI seeks to challenge the award only vis-a-vis claim nos.1 and 2.2. Insofar as claim no.1 is concerned, it relates to recovery of Welfare Cess. NHAI before the Arbitral Tribunal under this head sought recovery of Rs.2,54,54,998/-. 3 Likewise, under claim no.2, NHAI sought recovery of Rs.52,82,560/- with respect to payments made to the respondent qua escalation on materials advan...
Tag this Judgment!Manish Kumar Sharma vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 2769/2018 Judgment delivered on:23. 01.2019 MANISH KUMAR SHARMA STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Kumar Vikram, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Brahmprakash, PS Ranhola. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.129/2018 under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC, Police Station Ranhola.2. FIR was registered on the complaint of the father of the deceased. It is alleged that at the time of the marriage the complainant had given all the necessary household dowry articles as per his status. FIR contends that approximately for a period of 1 year after the marriage everything was alright. Thereafter a girl child was born. It is alleged that after the birth of the girl child harassment of his daughter started. The allegation is that the daught...
Tag this Judgment!