Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ved Singh vs.addl. Commissioner of Police Licensing Unit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
$~27 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8506/2015 VED SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr L. K. Parsi and Mr Ravi Kumar, Advocates. versus ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE LICENSING UNIT .....Respondent Through: Mr Satyakam, Additional Standing Counsel, GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER2401.2019 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order 1. dated 12.08.2015 passed by the Appellate Authority (Lieutenant Governor, Delhi) whereby the petitioners appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereafter the Arms Act) preferred against an order dated 08.07.2014 passed by the Licensing Authority, was rejected. The petitioner claims that he is an RTI Activist and also the 2. President of Ganesh Nagar Resident Welfare Association. He further claims to be a property consultant. On 05.09.2013, the petitioner applied for an arms licence for personal protection. W.P. (C) 8506/2015 Page 1 of 11 On 14.11.2013, the petitioner wa...
Mr. Kashmir Thomas vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 24, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 2649/2018 MR. KASHMIR THOMAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Mr. Dinkar Singh, Mr. Dinhar Takiar, Mr. Anuj Singh, Ms. Aekta Vats, Mr. Sankalp Kohli and Mr. Aahil Arora, Advocates versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr.M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor with Inspector C.L.Meena Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. Sikander, Ms. Vidushi Bajpai and Mr. Yashwardhan Oza, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER... Petitioner, who is driver of the husband of complainant seeks pre- arrest bail in FIR1292016 under Sections 380/403/420/120B/34/201 IPC. While entertaining this application, interim order of 2nd November, 2018 was passed. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has joined the investigation. It is submitted that the recovery made from petitioner belongs to his wife and that the co-accused of petitioner has been already granted the concession of pre-arrest bail...
Rajeev Kumar Batra vs.kewal Krishan Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h January, 2019. CS(OS) 462/2018, IA No.16387/2018 (u/O XXXVII R-3(4) read with S-151 CPC) & IA No.472/2019 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) SAMEER BHUTANI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhijat, Mr. Rishabh Bansal & Mr. Ajay Arjun Sharma, Advs. Versus KEWAL KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Narendera M. Sharma, Ms. Prachi Gupta & Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advs. AND CS(OS) 463/2018, IA No.16386/2018(u/O XXXVII R-3(4) read with S-151 CPC) & IA No.471/2019 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) RAJEEV KUMAR BATRA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhijat, Mr. Rishabh Bansal & Mr. Ajay Arjun Sharma, Advs. Versus KEWAL KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Narendera M. Sharma, Ms. Prachi Gupta & Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The applications of the sole defendant in both the suits under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), for recovery of CS(OS) 462/2018 & CS(OS) 463/2018 Page 1 o...
M/S Crocs Inc Usa vs.bioworld Merchandising (I) Pvt Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:08. 05.2018 Pronounced on:24. 01.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 79/2018 & CM APPL. 17362-65/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ANR ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 80/2018 & CM APPL. 17366-69/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2018 & CM APPL. 17370-73/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus M/S ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 82/2018 & CM APPL. 17374-77/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ANR. FAO(OS)(COMM)No.79/2018 & connected matters ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + FAO(OS) (COMM) 83/2018 & CM APPL. 17378-81/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD. & ANR.... RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 84/2018 & CM APPL. 17382-85/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/ S BATA INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPOND...
Malkeet Singh & Ors vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 376/2019 MALKEET SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravinder Kaur, Advocate versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rajender Singh, PS Tilak Nagar Ms. Karishma Chhibbar, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 1621/2019 (Exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 376/2019 Quashing of FIR No.149/2018, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 12th July, 2018 (Annexure A-2) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- is the respondent No.2, present State submits that in the Court CRL. M.C. 376/2019 Page 1 of 4 complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by ASI...
Dayanand Sharma & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:01. 11.2018 Pronounced on:24. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 6989/2002 & CM Appl. 27515-27516/2018 DAYANAND SHARMA & ORS. Through: Mr.S.Sunil, Advocate versus ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajesh Kumar & Ms.Santwana, Advocates for CBI ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR.JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % 1. The present writ petition is directed against an order dated 17.04.2002 whereby the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereafter referred to as the Tribunal]. dismissed the petitioners application (OA No.1061/2001) and consequently upheld the seniority list drawn by the respondent authorities for Head Constables, Assistant Sub-Inspectors (ASI), and Sub-Inspectors (SI), in the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).2. The petitioners were directly recruited as Constables in the CBI in 1975 and were thereafter promoted as Head Constables and ASI. During the pendency o...
g.v.infosutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of order: January 24, 2019. + W.P.(C) 8436/2018 G.V.INFOSUTIONS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Ms. Soumya Singh, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocates versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE102), & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Commissioner of Income Tax, rejecting its application under Section 119(2)(b). It had applied for condoning the delay in filing a refund application.2. Facts for the purpose of deciding this writ petition are that the petitioner/assessee filed its Income Tax Return on 20.09.2013, covering Assessment Year 2013-2014. Its return reflected the tax deducted at source (TDS) as Rs.15,62,500/-. It appears, however, that a larger amount Rs.31,25,000/- had escaped the attention of the Assessee; so it ...
Sameer Bhutani vs.kewal Krishan Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h January, 2019. CS(OS) 462/2018, IA No.16387/2018 (u/O XXXVII R-3(4) read with S-151 CPC) & IA No.472/2019 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) SAMEER BHUTANI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhijat, Mr. Rishabh Bansal & Mr. Ajay Arjun Sharma, Advs. Versus KEWAL KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Narendera M. Sharma, Ms. Prachi Gupta & Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advs. AND CS(OS) 463/2018, IA No.16386/2018(u/O XXXVII R-3(4) read with S-151 CPC) & IA No.471/2019 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) RAJEEV KUMAR BATRA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhijat, Mr. Rishabh Bansal & Mr. Ajay Arjun Sharma, Advs. Versus KEWAL KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Narendera M. Sharma, Ms. Prachi Gupta & Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The applications of the sole defendant in both the suits under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), for recovery of CS(OS) 462/2018 & CS(OS) 463/2018 Page 1 o...
M/S Crocs Inc Usa vs.m/ S Bata India Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:08. 05.2018 Pronounced on:24. 01.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 79/2018 & CM APPL. 17362-65/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ANR ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 80/2018 & CM APPL. 17366-69/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2018 & CM APPL. 17370-73/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus M/S ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 82/2018 & CM APPL. 17374-77/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ANR. FAO(OS)(COMM)No.79/2018 & connected matters ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + FAO(OS) (COMM) 83/2018 & CM APPL. 17378-81/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD. & ANR.... RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 84/2018 & CM APPL. 17382-85/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/ S BATA INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPOND...
Dilshad vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 372/2019 DILSHAD Through: Muntazir Mehdi, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Bali Ram Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 1595/2019 (Exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 372/2019 Quashing of FIR No.327/2018, under Sections 354/354-D/506/509 of IPC registered at police station Sadar Bazar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 16th January, 2019 (Annexure A-4) of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »