Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 21 of about 755 results (0.013 seconds)Kulwinder Singh @ Sunny Sohal vs.state of Nct
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2439/2016 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 2108/2016 KULWINDER SINGH @ SUNNY SOHAL ........ Petitioner STATE OF NCT versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Ms.Kawaljit Kochar, Advocate. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. ASI Dushyant, P.S.Vikas Puri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2401.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.556/2016 under Section 498A/4IPC, Police Station Vikas Puri. Subject FIR emanates out of a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have settled their disputes and had jointly applied for divorce by mutual consent.... Petitioner had agreed to pay a total amount of Rs.3,00,000/- to the complainant towards permanent alimony for past, present and future which was to be paid in two instalments, Rs.1,50,000/- at the BAIL APPLN...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Singh & Anr. Vs.braham Dutt Tiwari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
$~14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 342/2016 and Crl.M.A.1454/2016 RAJ KUMAR SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. V.P. Katiyar, Advocate with Mr. Puneet Verma, Advocate Versus BRAHAM DUTT TIWARI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (CC No.26/2001) of the respondent presented on 07.12.2001, the petitioners along with one another were summoned by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM), by his order dated 17.01.2015, to answer the accusations of offences punishable under sections 427/448/380/5of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The said order was challenged by the petitioners in the court of sessions by criminal revision petition No.17/2015. The revisional court dismissed the said challenge by order dated 03.11.2015. Challenging both the said consistent orders of the two courts below, the present petition was filed invoking the inhere...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Crocs Inc Usa vs.m/s Liberty Shoes Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:08. 05.2018 Pronounced on:24. 01.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 79/2018 & CM APPL. 17362-65/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ANR ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 80/2018 & CM APPL. 17366-69/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2018 & CM APPL. 17370-73/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus M/S ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 82/2018 & CM APPL. 17374-77/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ANR. FAO(OS)(COMM)No.79/2018 & connected matters ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + FAO(OS) (COMM) 83/2018 & CM APPL. 17378-81/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD. & ANR.... RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 84/2018 & CM APPL. 17382-85/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/ S BATA INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPOND...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Crocs Inc Usa vs.m/s Action Shoes Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:08. 05.2018 Pronounced on:24. 01.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 79/2018 & CM APPL. 17362-65/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ANR ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 80/2018 & CM APPL. 17366-69/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2018 & CM APPL. 17370-73/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus M/S ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 82/2018 & CM APPL. 17374-77/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ANR. FAO(OS)(COMM)No.79/2018 & connected matters ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + FAO(OS) (COMM) 83/2018 & CM APPL. 17378-81/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD. & ANR.... RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 84/2018 & CM APPL. 17382-85/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/ S BATA INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPOND...
Tag this Judgment!K K K vs.b
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:24. 01.2019 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 198/2017 & CM APPL. 41215/2017 K K K B CORAM: ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Satish Kumar, Advocate. versus Through: ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 05.04.2017 passed by the learned Trial Court in HMA No.61546/2016 whereby the petition under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the appellant for dissolution of marriage has been dismissed.2. The brief and relevant facts are that the parties got married on 13.04.1996 at Delhi as per Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. A girl child was born on 27.11.1997 out of the said wedlock. The parties MAT. APP (F.C.) No.198/2017 Page 1 of 12 cohabited as husband and wife at the matrimonial home at Raj Nagar- II, Palam Colony, New Delhi.3. The disputes and differences having arisen between the parties,...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Kumar Shrivastava & Anr. Vs.uoi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. h January, 2019 Pronounced on:24. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6992/2002 AJAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. L.R. Khatana, Adv. versus UOI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha & Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR.JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % 1. The petitioners in this writ petition are aggrieved by orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter, "the Tribunal") dated 10.01.2002 and 04.04.2002 dismissing their Original Application (O.A. No.620/2001) and their application for review (R.A. No.83/2002).2. The petitioners are officers of the Central Secretariat Service and were serving as Section Officers at the time of filing the application before the Tribunal. Although they completed the eligibility criteria of 8 years of service as Section Officers, qualifying them for promotion to the grade of Under Secretary, the...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Crocs Inc Usa vs.m/s Bata India Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:08. 05.2018 Pronounced on:24. 01.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 78/2018 & CM APPL. 17358-61/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S BATA INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 79/2018 & CM APPL. 17362-65/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ANR ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 80/2018 & CM APPL. 17366-69/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2018 & CM APPL. 17370-73/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ORS FAO(OS)(COMM)No.78/2018 & connected matters ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 44 + + + + + + + + + FAO(OS) (COMM) 82/2018 & CM APPL. 17374-77/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ANR. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 83/2018 & CM APPL. 17378-81/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD. & ANR.... RESPOND...
Tag this Judgment!Dinesh Aneja vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
$~23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2719/2018 DINESH ANEJA Decided on:24. h January, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Chirag Aneja, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar. Mr. P.S. Singh, Senior Standing Counsel for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is facing prosecution on charge of offences punishable under sections 376/328/506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), arising out of first information report (FIR) No.558/2016 of Police Station, Ambedkar Nagar. By order dated 21.12.2016, his request for anticipatory bail, by bail application No.2237/2016, was granted by a learned Single Judge of this court with suitable conditions as to bail bonds to be furnished being added, one of the conditions being that he would not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. It appears that on the...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Dentsu Marcom Pvt Ltd vs.central Board of Trustees, Through: Assis ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA6882018 & CM APPL. 51448/2018 M/S DENTSU MARCOM PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ranvir Singh and Mr. Rajiv Arora, Advocates. CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, THROUGH: ASSISTANT P F COMMISSIONER DELHI (SOUTH) versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate along with Mr. Sunil Ranjan, EOC (Legal) CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER2401.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal against an order dated 12th November 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of W.P.(C) 12089/2018 filed by the Respondent, Central Board of Trustees of the Employees Provident Fund Organisation (hereafter the PF Authority).2. The background facts are that two show cause notices (SCNs) were issued on 22nd April 2014 by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (hereafter the Competent Authority) to the Appellant making demands for payment of damages/interest under Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Fund an...
Tag this Judgment!Ved Singh vs.addl. Commissioner of Police Licensing Unit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2019
$~27 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8506/2015 VED SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr L. K. Parsi and Mr Ravi Kumar, Advocates. versus ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE LICENSING UNIT .....Respondent Through: Mr Satyakam, Additional Standing Counsel, GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER2401.2019 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order 1. dated 12.08.2015 passed by the Appellate Authority (Lieutenant Governor, Delhi) whereby the petitioners appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereafter the Arms Act) preferred against an order dated 08.07.2014 passed by the Licensing Authority, was rejected. The petitioner claims that he is an RTI Activist and also the 2. President of Ganesh Nagar Resident Welfare Association. He further claims to be a property consultant. On 05.09.2013, the petitioner applied for an arms licence for personal protection. W.P. (C) 8506/2015 Page 1 of 11 On 14.11.2013, the petitioner wa...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »