Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 19 of about 755 results (0.023 seconds)Satender Pal & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2686/2018 SATENDER PAL & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ranjan Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Kumar Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 22.02.2009 and out of the said wedlock, she gave birth to a male child on 06.01.2011. On 16.05.2016, she lodged first information report (FIR) no.77/2016 with police station Crime (Women) (CAW Cell), Nanak Pura, alleging offences punishable under Sections 498A/4of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband (first petitioner), his father (second petitioner) and his mother (third petitioner). On conclusion of the investigation, police filed report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) on ...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 25, 2019 CRL.M.C. 393/2019 ASHOK Through: Mr.K.Z.Khan, Advocate .....Petitioner versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Shamsher Singh Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.1697/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 393/2019 Quashing of FIR No.102/2013, under Section 379 of IPC and 135 Indian Electricity Act, registered at police station Jaitpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of No Dues Certificate of 7th November, 2012 (Annexure P-2) reached between the parties. Upon notice, Mr. M.S.Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State and Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.2, accept notice. Learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant submits that in view of No Dues Certificate of 7th November, 2012 (Annexure P-2)...
Tag this Judgment!Sriharsha Majety vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:-"25th January, 2019 CRL. M.C. 415/2019 & Crl.M.A. 1757-58/2019 SRIHARSHA MAJETY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Narender Mann, Mr. Sachin Sharma, Mr. Sumit Misra & Mr. Satyavrat Sharma, Advs. ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Pawan Kumar, PS Kalkaji, New Delhi. Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Mr. Aman Usman & Mr. Shadman Siddiqui, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has come up to this Court invoking the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), feeling aggrieved by the order dated 11.01.2019 of the Metropolitan Magistrate whereby he, along with certain others, stands summoned as additional accused on the basis of supplementary Crl. M.C. No.415/2019 Page 1 of 6 report (supplementary charge-sheet) under Section 173 Cr.P.C. submitted on the said date by the po...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjeev Kumar vs.asim Kumar
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:18. h January, 2019 Pronounced on:25. h January, 2019 + RC.REV. 357/2018 CM Appl. Nos. 30209/2018 SANJEEV KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Pushpendu Shukla, Advocate versus ASIM KUMAR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.P.R.Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This revision challenges the impugned order dated 01.12.2017 passed by the learned ACJ-CCJ-ARC(EAST), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter Trial Court) in Eviction Petition No.RC/ARC5252016 in Asim Kumar vs Sanjeev Kumar filed by the landlord/ respondent herein against the tenant/petitioner herein under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act).2. The learned Trial Court vide impugned order had dismissed the leave to defend application of the petitioner and had passed an eviction order in respect of shop No.4, Ground Floor in property bearing No.X/438, Gali No.O, Ram Nagar, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi 110031 (here...
Tag this Judgment!Vipin Jain vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 25, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 357/2018 VIPIN JAIN Through: Mr.K.Singhal and Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate .....Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Shiv Prakash CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.(B) 34/2019 (u/S397Cr.P.C.) By way of this application, suspension of sentence is sought for getting petitioners daughter admitted in a school in Class-I.... Petitioner has been sentenced to simple imprisonment for five years and fine with default clause, for the offence under Section 326 IPC. On earlier occasion also, interim suspension of sentence was granted to petitioner on the occasion of surgery of his mother. On the last date of hearing, petitioners counsel had handed over the admission form of petitioners daughter-Jigyasa Jain for admission in a school. CRL.REV.P. 357/2018 Page 1 of 2 Today, a status report has...
Tag this Judgment!State vs.sanjay Kumar Tiwari
Court: Delhi
$~19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2712/2016 STATE Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP ........ Petitioner for the State with SI Nepal Singh, PS CR Park. versus SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Respondent in person. ..... Respondent ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) No.76/2007 of the subject case was registered on the compliant of Phool Singh, a delivery-man, engaged by a firm named and styled as Kalkaji Gas Service, the duties entrusted to him being to take gas cylinders from the godown of his employer in a three wheeler scooter (TSR) and deliver the same to the respective consumers, as per instructions.2. It is alleged that, on 16.03.2007, he having carried twenty-two gas cylinders from the godown of his employer, had reached near house No.1520 in C.R. Park, New Delhi at about 1:45 p.m., he was accosted by four persons who had come to the place in an Indica car bearing registration N...
Tag this Judgment!Shanti Kumar Ramsisaria & Anr. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 624/2016 and Crl.M.A.2572/2016 SHANTI KUMAR RAMSISARIA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate with Mr. R.P. Singh, Mr. Harendra Singh, Ms. Swati Srivastava, Advocates Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with Insp. K.P. Shah, SHO PS Model Town, & SI Tej Singh. Mr. Devendra Kumar Singh Advocate with Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the criminal case registered on the basis of report (charge sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), submitted upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.30/2008 of Police Station Model Town, the petitioners were summoned as accused to answer the accusations for offences punishable under Sections 380/420/452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). After securing th...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Crocs Inc Usa vs.m/s Aqualite India Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:08. 05.2018 Pronounced on:24. 01.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 79/2018 & CM APPL. 17362-65/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ANR ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 80/2018 & CM APPL. 17366-69/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2018 & CM APPL. 17370-73/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus M/S ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 82/2018 & CM APPL. 17374-77/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ANR. FAO(OS)(COMM)No.79/2018 & connected matters ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + FAO(OS) (COMM) 83/2018 & CM APPL. 17378-81/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD. & ANR.... RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 84/2018 & CM APPL. 17382-85/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/ S BATA INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPOND...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Crocs Inc Usa vs.m/s Relaxo Footwear Ltd
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:08. 05.2018 Pronounced on:24. 01.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 79/2018 & CM APPL. 17362-65/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD & ANR ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 80/2018 & CM APPL. 17366-69/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2018 & CM APPL. 17370-73/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus M/S ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 82/2018 & CM APPL. 17374-77/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/S AQUALITE INDIA LTD & ANR. FAO(OS)(COMM)No.79/2018 & connected matters ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + FAO(OS) (COMM) 83/2018 & CM APPL. 17378-81/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA ..... Appellant versus BIOWORLD MERCHANDISING INDIA LTD. & ANR.... RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) (COMM) 84/2018 & CM APPL. 17382-85/2018 M/S CROCS INC USA versus M/ S BATA INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPOND...
Tag this Judgment!Sattu vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1424/2018 SATTU ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Mr. Braham Singh, Mr. Rohit Vidhudi, Mr. M.S. Vidhudi and Ms. Swati, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Shailender Singh, PS Amar Colony : JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.126/2018 under Sections 354/354A/356/3IPC, Police Station Amar Colony.2. As per the allegations in the FIR, the complainant was walking on the street and was threatened by three boys who misbehaved with her and also snatched a gold chain. It is alleged that she has named two of the boys in the FIR and contended that they were calling each BAIL APPLN.1424/2018 Page 1 of 3 other by name.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ...
Tag this Judgment!