Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 17 of about 755 results (0.016 seconds)Salma Dam Joint Venture Through: Sjv Projects Pvt. Ltd vs.wapcos Limit ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:27. 9.2018 Judgment pronounced on:25. 01.2019 + ARB.P. 810/2016 & I.A. 15589/2017 (for impleadment) SALMA DAM JOINT VENTURE THROUGH: SJV PROJECTS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shreyas Jayasimha, Ms. Supriya Jain and Ms. Shweta Vaishisht, Advs. versus WAPCOS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Milanka Choudhury, Mr. Vineet Dvivedi, Ms. Naina Dubey and Ms. Sakshi Singh, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R.K. Sanghi, Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Mr. Ishan Sanghi and Mr. K. Prasanna, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Prefatory facts:1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 Act).2. The petitioner before me is a joint venture entity going by the name: Salma Dam Joint Venture (hereafter referred to as J.V. entity). The J.V. entity comprises a company ...
Tag this Judgment!Vijay vs.the State
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 25, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 203/2019 VIJAY Through: Mr. Varun Dhingra, Advocate .....Petitioner versus THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr.M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor with SI Mumtaz Ahmad CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 1699/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 203/2019... Petitioner is the husband of deceased who seeks regular bail in FIR No.19/2014, under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC, registered at police station D.B.G. Road, New Delhi while claiming that petitioner is in custody for more than five years. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that for the last one and half year, Investigating Officer of this case is not deposing before the trial court and the next date of hearing before the trial court is 7th February, 2019. Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State, accepts notice. BAIL APPLN. 203/2019 Page 1 of 2 Let the Additio...
Tag this Judgment!R O vs.s
Court: Delhi
$~31 * + S CORAM: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R O Date of Decision:25. 01.2019 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 25/2019 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Swastik Singh, Advocate. versus Through ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) CM APPL. 3853/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 3854/2018 (delay in re-filing the present appeal) 3. This is an application filed by appellant seeking condonation of five days delay in re-filing the present appeal.4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the present appeal is condoned.5. The application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 25/2019 6. The challenge in this appeal is to an order passed by the Family Court MAT. APP (F.C.) No.25/2019 Page 1 of 6 dated 01.05.2018, on an application filed by respondent/wife under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. In this case, marriage between the pa...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Asian Institute of Medical Sciences Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Pes Installat ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.84/2017 + % M/S ASIAN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES PVT. LTD. 25th January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate (M. No.9312315121) with Mr. Shivam Tyagi, Advocate (M. No.9643137262). Versus M/S PES INSTALLATIONS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/defendant impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 01.12.2014 by which the trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by RFA No .84/2017 Page 1 of 5 the appellant/defendant in an Order XXXVII CPC suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 12,23,366/- with interest.2. A suit under Order XXXVII CPC lies only if either there exists a dishonoured negotiable instrument or there is a written contract stating a liquid...
Tag this Judgment!Uoi vs.r.s.yadav
Court: Delhi
$~25 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 8345/2011 UOI R.S.YADAV Through Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Kamaldeep, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus Through Mr. S.K. Dubey and Mr. Udit Malik, ..... Respondent Advs. for R-1. Ms. Manisha Lau Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ravi Kant Jain, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Union of India has preferred the present writ petition to assail the orders dated 24.02.2011 passed in MA No.133/2011 in Original Application No.626/2007, and 06.09.2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal the petitioner had sought review of the order dated 24.02.2011. The Tribunal had dismissed MA No.133/2011, as also the RA. in Review Application No.116/2011, whereby, (CAT) W.P.(C) No.8345/2011 Page 1 of 5 Respondent No.1 was sought 2. to be proceeded departmentally by issuance of a charge-sheet on 20.04.2001, which primar...
Tag this Judgment!Ravish Kashyap & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 25, 2019 CRL.M.C. 265/2019, CRL.M.A. 1123/2019 SWATI & ANR. ........ Petitioners STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate versus Through: Mr. .....Respondents Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Nanu Ram Mr. A.N. Aggarwal, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. 397/2019, CRL.M.A. 1713/2019 RAVISH KASHYAP & ORS. .....Petitioners CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The above captioned two petitions are outcome of a marital discord. In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR No.95/2016, under CRL. M.C. 372/2019 Page 1 of 5 STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. A.N. Aggarwal, Advocate versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Tej Ram. Mr. AK. Chaudhary, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. Sections 468/471/420/209/5of IPC, registered at police station Dwarka South, New Delhi is sought by the wife and broth...
Tag this Judgment!Patil Rail Infrastructure Private Limited vs.s. L. Gupta and Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:25.01.2019 + W.P.(C) 3264/2018 & CM No.12871/2018 PATIL RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED versus S. L. GUPTA AND ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr R. K. Sanghi, Mr Ishan Sanghi and Mr Satyendra Kumar, Advocates. Mr Jayant Mehta, Mr Gauhar Mirza, Mr Mohit and Mr Pranav Gopalakrishnan, Advocates. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the letter dated 17.10.2016 (hereafter the impugned letter) and a show cause notice dated 29.06.2016(hereafter the impugned notice). In terms of the show cause notice dated 29.06.2016, the petitioner was called upon to submit its explanation / statement of defence as to why the petitioner should not be banned from business dealings with respondent No.2 (hereafter IRCON). It is alleged in the impugned notice that th...
Tag this Judgment!Independent News Service Pvt. Limited vs.sucherita Kukreti
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h January, 2019 CS(OS) 43/2019 & IA No.1191/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) INDEPENDENT NEWS SERVICE PVT. LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Ms. Shreya Jain, Advs. Versus SUCHERITA KUKRETI ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Mr. Mrinal Ojha, Mr. Sukrit Seth, Harshul Singh Mr. Mrinal Bharti, and Mr., Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.1192/2019 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CS(OS) 43/2019 & IA No.1191/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) 3. The plaintiff, a Television News Channel, has instituted this suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant, a news broadcaster with the plaintiff since the year 2004, from taking up similar work with any other television channel during the term till 30th November, 2019...
Tag this Judgment!Devender Kumar Kamat @ Deepu @ Chotu vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 25, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 2743/2018 DEVENDER KUMAR KAMAT @ DEEPU @ CHOTU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocates versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT ) OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Vishnu Dutt CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner seeks bail in FIR5032015, under Section 439 Cr.P.C. r/w Section 482 Cr. P.C., registered at police station New Friends Colony, New Delhi on the ground that the complainant/first informant is discrepant. the evidence of Learned counsel for petitioner has sought the discrepancy regarding the date and time of incident to submit that the prosecution version is not reliable. to point out Upon hearing and on perusal of copy of deposition of the complainant/first informant, I prima facie find discrepancies pointed out in the version of complainant, do not justify grant of bai...
Tag this Judgment!In the Matter of National Institute of Food Technology Entreprenuershi ...
Court: Delhi
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CO.PET. 3/2019 Date of decision:25. 01.2019 IN THE MATTER OF NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENUERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT (VOL. LIQN.) ....... Petitioner Through Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv for the OL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This company petition is filed under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956, by the official liquidator (OL) seeking dissolution of the company, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (in members voluntary liquidation).2. The said Company was incorporated on 07.08.2007, with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana. The Corporate Identity Number of the Company is U80300DL2007NPL166745. The Company is stated to have been set up by the Ministry of Food Processing Industries, Government of India, under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956.3. The directors of the Company, as on the date of passing the resolution of voluntary winding...
Tag this Judgment!