Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 14 of about 755 results (0.018 seconds)Shivam vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 572/2018 SHIVAM Date of Order: January 28, 2019 .....Petitioner Through: Nemo. versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with Inspector O.P.Mandal CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of orders of 4th June 2018 and 11th May, 2018 is sought in this petition. Vide order of 11th May, 2018, bail has been declined to petitioner and the Appellate Court vide impugned order of 4th June, 2018 has maintained trial courts order declining bail to petitioner. None appears on behalf of petitioner even on the second call in the post lunch session. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State informs that petitioner has been released on bail by Juvenile Justice Board on 29th November, 2018. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of as infructuous. JANUARY28 2019/v CRL.REV.P. 572/2018 (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE Page 1 of 2 CRL....
Tag this Judgment!M/S Sagu Dreamland Private Limited & Anr vs.m/s Jingal Bell Amusement ...
Court: Delhi
+ AND + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: January 15, 2019 Judgment delivered on: January 28, 2019 FAO(OS) 172/2018, CM Nos. 48857/2018 & 48859/2018 M/S SAGU DREAMLAND PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Mr. Divyanshu Shrivastava and Mr. Shivansh Soni, Advs. versus M/S JINGAL BELL AMUSEMENT PARK (PVT) LTD Through: Mr. S. Khan and Ms. Jayanti, Advs. ..... Respondent FAO(OS) 173/2018, CM Nos. 48874/2018 & 48876/2018 M/S SAGU DREAMLAND PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Mr. Divyanshu Shrivastava and Mr. Shivansh Soni, Advs. versus SPLASH ISLAND PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS Through: Mr. Shailen Bhatia and Ms. Ekta Nayar, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) 172/2018 and connected matter Page 1 of 5 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J CM No.48859/2018 (for placing additional a...
Tag this Judgment!Kailash Chand & Anr vs.santosh
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.72/2019 * + % KAILASH CHAND & ANR. 28th January, 2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. C.S.S. Tomar, Advocate (Mobile No.9810622816). SANTOSH versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.3897/2019 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. Nos. 3898-99/2019 (for delays) 2. For the reasons stated in the applications the delays in filing and re-filing the appeal stand condoned, subject to just exceptions. C.Ms. stand disposed of. RFA No.72/2019 Page 1 of 9 RFA No.72/2019 and C.M. Appl. No.3896/2019 (for stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendants in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 31.05.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for partition filed by the respondent/plaintiff/si...
Tag this Judgment!Msk Projects India Limited vs.national Highway Authority of India and ...
Court: Delhi
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4945/2010 & CM APPL. 9779/2019, 19899/2010 MSK PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Karan Luthra, Mr Rishi versus Aggarwala, Ms Niyati Kohli, Ms Aarushi Tiku, Advocates. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Padma Priya, Ms Saumya Priyadarshini, Advocates NHAI. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2801.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the letters dated 13.05.2010, 24.05.2010 and 20.07.2010 sent by respondent no.1 (hereafter NHAI) holding that the petitioners bid was unresponsive and further calling upon the petitioner to pay 5% of the bid security, furnished by the petitioner. NHAI has further threatened that it would invoke the bank guarantees furnished along with the bid as security, if the said demand of penalty is not satisfied. The petitioner further prays that directions be issued t...
Tag this Judgment!Sukhmeet Singh Anand vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 28, 2019 CRL.M.C. 95/2019 & CRL.M.As. 427-28/2019 & 1083-84/2019 ........ Petitioner SUKHMEET SINGH ANAND Through: Mr. Deepak Bashta and Ms. Simon Benjamin, Advocates STATE & ANR Versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Krishan Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) No.93/2014, under of FIR Quashing Sections 420/467/468/471/384/120-B of IPC and Section 12 of Indian Passport Act, registered at police station Economic Offences Wing, Delhi is sought on merits. It is brought to the notice of this Court that petitioner is contesting the extradition proceedings pending against him before the Court in Spain. Before petitioner can be heard in this petition, the outcome of the extradition proceedings is required to be seen.... Petitioner relies upon Supreme Courts decision in Inder Mohan Goswami & Another vs. State of Uttaranchal & Others 200...
Tag this Judgment!Harmohini Sarna and Ors vs.govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9445/2017 HARMOHINI SARNA AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Ayushman Pandey, Mr Ruchira Singh and Ms Deepanshi Kumar, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER2801.2019 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning 1. an order dated 24.01.2017 passed by the Sub-Registrar, Vikas Sadan, DDA whereby the request of the petitioners for registering a Power of Attorney in favour of Ms Anjali Sarna (wife of petitioner no.2 and the daughter-in-law of petitioner no.1) was rejected. The petitioners also impugn an order dated 19.07.2017 passed by the District Magistrate and Registrar, whereby the petitioners appeal under Section 72 of the Registration Act, 1908, preferred against the impugned order dated 24.01.2017, was rejected.2. Admittedly, petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.2 are related inasmuch as petitioner no.1 is a moth...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Rahul Sofat vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
20 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 101/2015 SHRI RAHUL SOFAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Varma, Advocate Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent None Date of Decision:28. h January, 2019. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for grant of Letters of Administration of Will dated 05th April, 2005 with respect to the immovable properties of deceased Smt. Raj Mehta, daughter of Late Sh. R.S. Mehta, which are situated outside Delhi in Himachal Pradesh and Haryana.2. It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is the nephew of the testatrix Late Smt. Raj Mehta who expired on 25th April, 2005, in Haryana. The deceased is stated to have executed a registered Will dated 05th April, 2005, which was duly attested by Mr. S.R. Mittal and Mr. R.P. Singh. TEST.CAS.101/2015 page 1 of 4 3. It is stated that the deceased has left ...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak Kumar & Ors. Vs.state of Nct Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 28, 2019 CRL.M.C. 424/2019, CRL.M.A. 1855-1856/2019 DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shiva Jee Shukla, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Bharat Lal Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.278/2017, under Sections 354/509/5of IPC registered at police station Hauz Khas is sought on the basis of affidavit of 23rd January, 2019 (Annexure P-6) of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, Ms. Neelam Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Bharat Lal on the basis of identity pr...
Tag this Judgment!Minor P Represented By: Her Father vs.state
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: January 28, 2019 W.P.(CRL) 3822/2018 MINOR P REPRESENTED BY: HER FATHER ...... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Roshan Santhalia, Advocate versus STATE ... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr.Jamal Akhtar and Mr.Chaitanya Gosain, Advocates SI Rinku Bhakar, PS Ranhola CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner is a minor, who is represented through her father, on whose complaint FIR No.431/2018 was registered at PS Ranhola for offences punishable under SectionsIPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short POCSO Act). The petitioner during the course of trial, needed a copy of the charge-sheet which was directed to be supplied to the petitioner by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 14th August, 2018 but at the expense of the petitioner and as per rules.2. Section 25(2) of the POCSO Act reads as under: W.P....
Tag this Judgment!Shanker Doon & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
+ AND + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: October 11, 2018 Judgment delivered on: January 28, 2019 LPA7332017, CM Nos. 41569-41574/2017 & 9883/2018 SHANKER DOON & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal, Adv., Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Adv., Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv., Ms. Akriti Dewan, Adv. and Mr. Avesh Chaudhary, Adv. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC for GNCTD ........ RESPONDENTS with Mr. Chirayu Jain, Adv. and Ms. Nikita Goyal, Adv. for GNCTD Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Namit Suri, Mr. Dipender Chauhan, Mr. Kunal Kumar, Ms. Parul Panthi, Mr. Saaket Jain and Ms. Aprajita, Advs. for Self Financing Education Institutions Association. LPA7342017, CM Nos. 41584-41587/2017 GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC for GNCTD ..... Appellants with Mr. Chirayu Jain and Ms. Nikita Goyal, Advs. for GNCTD Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC (Civil) for GNCTD LPA7332017 and connected matt...
Tag this Judgment!