Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 13 of about 755 results (0.023 seconds)Delhi Transport Infrasturcture Development Corporation Ltd vs.pankaj & ...
Court: Delhi
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:29. 01.2019 F.A.O.No.136/2018 DELHI TRANSPORT INFRASTURCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advocate. PANKAJ & ORS Versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Dutt Dixit & Ms. Neha Shukla, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL C.M. No.4227/2019 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. C.M. No.14439/2018 (for delay) For the justifiable reasons explained in the application, delay of 435 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of accordingly. F.A.O. No.136/2018 & C.M. Nos.14441/2018, 4226/2019 (both for stay) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, FAO No.136/2018 Page 1 of 2 1996 in this court. Subsequently, without the knowledge of the appellant, the petition was transferred to the district courts on ...
Tag this Judgment!Vicky vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. 01.2019 + VICKY BAIL APPLN. 137/2019 versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State Mr. Ravi Drall, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail in FIR No.260/2016 under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 IPC at Police Station Deshbandhu Gupta Road, Delhi for a period of two months to undergo treatment and surgery for gall bladder stone.2. The medical condition of the petitioner has been verified. The verification report in the form of questions put by the IO and the response given by the Office of Senior Medical Officer of Central Jail has been produced and the same are taken on record.3. As per the medical verification report, the Medical Officer Incharge has reported that the petitioner suffers from g...
Tag this Judgment!State vs.radhey Shyam Mishra
Court: Delhi
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 761/2018 STATE Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP. ........ Petitioner versus RADHEY SHYAM MISHRA Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI % ORDER2901.2019 1. The State is aggrieved by the judgment dated 07.1.2018, passed by learned ASJ-Special (FTC-2), (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, acquitting the respondent in Case No.576/2017, arising out of FIR No.622/2016 P.S. Burari for the offence under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.2. The case as set up by the prosecution is based on the statement of the prosecutrix that on 20.12.2016 at about 1.00pm, she had gone to get some medicine from the clinic of a homeopathic doctor, the respondent herein. At that time, no one was present in the clinic. As per the prosecutrix, the accused took her to the patient couch behind the curtain and locked the clinic from inside and raped her. When the husband of the prosecutrix, PW-5, Ram Vilas re...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak Sharma & Ors. Vs.the State ( n.c.t of Delhi ) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 29, 2019 CRL.M.C. 460/2019 & CRL.M.As. 1992-94/2019 DEEPAK SHARMA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.34/2013, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Shakarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 24th December, 2016 (Annexure P-4) arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Upon notice, Mr. M.S.Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by her counsel on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Udit Kalra & Anr. Vs.smt. Mamta Kukreja & Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :09. 01.2019 Date of decision:28. 01.2019 RSA7 2017 & CM No.425/2017, 18088/2017, 4772-73/2018 SH. UDIT KALRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate. SMT. MAMTA KUKREJA & ANR. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant vide the present Regular Second Appeal i.e. RSA72017 assails the judgment and decree dated 18.07.2016 of the Court of the learned ADJ-09 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in RCA No.611(Old RCA No.54/15) which dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants herein against the impugned judgment and decree dated 19.10.2011 of the learned Trial Court of the Civil Judge, North (IV), Tis Hazari Courts in Suit No.12vide Case ID No.C0829602006 vide which the suit filed by the respondent no.1 herein against the predecessor in interest of the appellant nos. 1 & 2 Smt. Pushpa and again...
Tag this Judgment!Aero Traders Pvt Ltd vs.ravinder Kumar Suri
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h January, 2019 Pronounced on:28. h January, 2019 RC.REV. 105/2016 & CM APPL Nos.44082/2016, 27383/2017 AERO TRADERS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Mandeep Singh Vinaik, Advocate. versus RAVINDER KUMAR SURI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Joy Basu, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Achin Mittal and Mr.Kanak Bose, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition challenges the order dated 13.08.2015 in eviction petition no.167/2011 titled as Ravinder Kumar Suri vs. Aero Traders Pvt. Ltd. passed by Commercial Civil Judge-cum-ARC (Central) Tis Hazari Court, Delhi wherein the eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) was allowed by the Court in favour of the respondent and against the petitioner.2. Before coming to the issues involved it would be appropriate to state few facts, as alleged, in eviction petition: a) the tenanted premises comprising of one room on ground floor, two rooms on the mez...
Tag this Judgment!Naeem & Ors. Vs.state of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 28, 2019 CRL.M.C. 428/2019, CRL.M.A. 1871/2019 NAEEM & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ritesh Agrawal, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Liyakat Ali Mr. Abhishek Rai, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) FIR No.of Quashing 644/2017, 498- A/406/354/509/5of IPC, registered at police station Jamia Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 7th December, 2018 (Annexure-B) reached between the parties. under Sections respondent No.2, present Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Liyakat Ali on the basis of identity proof produced by her. in the Court Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute CR...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Singh Dua vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 01.2019 BAIL APPLN. 920/2018 RAJ SINGH DUA versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Rohit Nagpal with Mr. Sukkdeep Kaur Rai, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Vikas Sahu, PS Naraina. Ms. Shikha Sapra with Mr. Shaswat Bhardwaj, Advocates for respondent No. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.245/2017 under Sections 498A/406/417/3IPC, Police Station Naraina.2. Parties have settled their disputes and have entered into an MOU dated 25.01.2019. Original MOU has been filed in Court. The BAIL APPLN.920/2018 Page 1 of 4 same is taken on record.3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that as per the MOU dated 25.01.2019, petitioner has undertaken to pay a sum of Rs.30 lakhs apart from the return of...
Tag this Judgment!Homeeek Realtors vs.mr Deepak Kainth & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~24 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 678/2015 HOMEEEK REALTORS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Vinay Ranjan, Advocate. versus MR DEEPAK KAINTH & ORS Through: None ..... Defendants Date of Decision:28. h January, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral) I.A.No.10563/2017 The learned Joint Registrar vide order dated 24th January, 2019 has observed that the defendants stand served through publication. Since none appears for the defendants, they are proceeded ex parte. Keeping in view the averments in the application, the same is allowed and the suit is restored to its original number. CS(OS) No.678/2015 1. The present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining passing off as well as for damages. ` CS (COS) 678/2015 Page 1 of 7 2. On 13th March, 2015, this Court granted an ex parte ad interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants. The relevant portion of the said order is reproduced hereinbelow:-" A prima...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Charan & Ors. Vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 28, 2019 CRL.M.C. 421/2019, Crl.M.A. 1841/2019 CHANDRA SHEKHAR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. A.K. Bali, Advocate Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Amit Kumar... RESPONDENTS No.2 to 4 in person + CRL.M.C. 422/2019, Crl.M.A. 1844/2019 RAM CHARAN & ORS .....Petitioners THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Bali, Advocate Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Amit Kumar... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR No.832/2014, under Sections 323/341/5of IPC, is sought on the basis of affidavits of respondents/complainant party, whereas the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR No.828/2014, under Sections 308/3of IPC, both registered at police station K...
Tag this Judgment!