Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 12 of about 755 results (0.019 seconds)M/S National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Oriental Structure Eng ...
Court: Delhi
$~R-32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 808/2012 Date of Decision :29. h January, 2019 M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Ms.Kritika Shukla, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus M/S ORIENTAL STRUCTURE ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. Through: Mr.Anil Airi, Sr. Adv. with ..... Respondent Mr.Ravi K Chandana, Ms.Bindiya Logawney and Ms.Sukanya Lal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 27.04.2012 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Allahabad Byepass Project Construction of road from KM198000 to KM242708 construction package: ABP-3 contract agreement No: ABP/3 dt.04.11.2004 (Reference No.3). OMP8082012 Page 1 2. In the petition, the petitioner had challenged the Award of Claim nos.1, 4...
Tag this Judgment!Manali Singhal vs.ravi Singhal
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h January, 2019. CM(M) 80/2018 & CM No.2196/2018 (for stay) RAVI SINGHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Mr. Ankit Virmani, Mr. Rinkel Singh, Mr. Krishan Tewary and Ms. Nimisha Narayan, Advs. MANALI SINGHAL Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee, Ms. Meera Menon, Ms. Vinita Sashidharan and Mr. Deepak Singh Rawat, Advs. with respondent-in-person. AND CM(M) 232/2018 * % + + MANALI SINGHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee, Ms. Meera Menon, Ms. Vinita Sashidharan and Mr. Deepak Singh Rawat, Advs. with petitioner-in-person. RAVI SINGHAL Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Mr. Ankit Virmani, Mr. Rinkel Singh, Mr. Krishan Tewary and Ms. Nimisha Narayan, Advs. CM(M) 80/2018 & CM(M) 232/2018 Page 1 of 18 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The husband as well as the wife, being dissatisfied with the order date...
Tag this Judgment!Central Board of Trustees, Epf vs.m/s.nancy Krafts
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) No.52/2015 & CM No.86/2015 (for stay) CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EPF ..... PETITIONER Through Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. versus ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Rajiv Arora, Adv. with Mr.S.P. Arora, Adv. M/S. NANCY KRAFTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 23rd September, 2014 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal) in A.T.A. No.216(04) 2010. The Tribunal has vide its impugned order allowed the Respondents appeal, thereby setting aside the orders dated 15th December, 2009 and 25th March, 2010 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid appeal had been dismissed by the Tribunal vide its order passed on 8th April, 2014, whereafter the impugned order has been passed allowing the same ap...
Tag this Judgment!Gpr Power Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs.hiranmaye Energy Ltd. (Formerly Known ...
Court: Delhi
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 1.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 285/2018 GPR POWER SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Adv versus HIRANMAYE ENERGY LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIA POWER CORPORATION (HALDIA) LTD. Through: Mr. Rishav Banerjee with Mr. Sarthak ..... Respondent Guru and Mr. Kumar Vivek Vibhu, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. On 27.11.2018, I had recorded the reasons, as to why the respondents were resisting the request made by the petitioner to extend time for conclusion of Arbitration proceedings.2. The order passed on 27.11.2018 is self-explanatory and hence is set forth hereafter:-"I have been shown the proceedings dated 16.08.2018 1. Mr. Sarthak Guru, who, appears for the respondent, seeks time to file the award.2. which took place before the learned Arbitrator.3. only counsel for the parties but also the Arbitrator were cognizant of the fact that the time for pronounc...
Tag this Judgment!Bhardwaj Thirvenkata Venkatavaraghavan vs.m/s Pvr Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:-"29th January, 2019 CRL. M.C. 2150/2018 BHARDWAJ THIRVENKATA VENKATAVARAGHAVAN Through: Mr. Sushil Bajaj & Mr. Shalin ........ Petitioner versus Arthwan, Advs. M/S PVR LTD. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint case (573/1/2015 new number 35421/2016) of the respondent, the petitioner along with certain others, were summoned as accused by the Metropolitan Magistrate, by order dated 11.04.2016, to answer the accusations of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act), the gravamen thereof being that no payment was made inspite of notice of demand after dishonor of certain cheques, which had been issued against the account of Vasan Health Care Pvt. Ltd., a company in which the petitioner and some of the other accused shown in the array were described as directors at the relevant point of time.2. The petitioner, feeling aggrieved...
Tag this Judgment!Amit & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 29, 2019 CRL.M.C. 464/2019 & CRL.M.A. 2006/2019 AMIT & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gurdeep Singh, Advocate Versus THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Suraj Pal Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.569/2016, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at police station Prashant Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 8th May, 2018 (Annexure-B) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- is the State submits that complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Suraj Pal, on the basis of identity proof produced by her. respondent No.2, present in the Court Respondent No.2 present in the Court submits that today she has received 35,000/- in cash, but one ceiling fan is retur...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Ds Foods & Ors vs.m/s Sagar Ratna Restaurants Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~43 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:29. 01.2019 F.A.O. No.36/2019 M/S DS FOODS & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Ms.Neha Sonawane, Advocate Sheoran, with Mr.Arjun Advocate. versus M/S SAGAR RATNA RESTAURANTS PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL C.M. Nos.4311/2019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. F.A.O. 36/2019 & CM No.4310/2019 (for stay) 1. The impugned order dated 27.12.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-02, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (ADJ), in a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) being ARB No.269/2018, restraining the appellants from using the trademark Sagar Ratna for a period of 90 days, is the subject matter of challenge in this appeal.2. The appellant entered into a Franchisee Agreement with the respondent on 06.06.2013 to open a restaurant under the registered FAO No.36/2019 Page 1 of 4 trad...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Jay Bharat Fertilizers Pvt Ltd vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8879/2016 & CM APPL. 36175/2016, 4218/2019 M/S JAY BHARAT FERTILIZERS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Kaushal Yadav and Mr Nandlal Kr Mishra, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Gaurav Sarin, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr Harish Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2901.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 16.05.2016, passed by the respondent rejecting the petitioners claim for interest on the subsidy on the sale of Single Super Phosphate (SSP) during the period 1998-99 and 1999-2000. In addition, the petitioner also prays that directions be issued to the respondent for grant of interest at the rate of 24% per annum for the delay in release of the claims of concession/subsidy of 81,92,400/- disbursed for the period 1998-99 and 1999-2000.2. The petitioner claims that in terms of the Office Memorandum dated 14.02.2011 issu...
Tag this Judgment!M/S British Airways vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"29.01.2019 + W.P.(C) No.5720/2015 M/S BRITISH AIRWAYS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar with Mr.Amit Kumar, Mr.Vikas Mehta, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr.Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC for R-1. Mr.Uttam Datt, Adv for R-2. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) CM APPL. 8171/2016 (u/s 17 B of the ID Act) 1. Vide the present application u/s 17 B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as Act) the respondent no.2/applicant seeks a direction to the petitioner to pay her the wages last drawn by her, including yearly increments, dearness allowance and revision of pay, from the date of her termination. However, the learned counsel for the applicant states that keeping in view the ambit of section 17 B of the Act, he is restricting the prayer in the application to a direction to the petitioner to pay the applicant her last W...
Tag this Judgment!O P Aggarwal vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~3 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2698/2016 O P AGGARWAL Decided on:29. h January, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bikash Vishwakarma, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State Mr. Ankit Aggrawal, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Advocate with Ms. Mahima Deepak, Ms. Roopali Wadhwan, & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioners son had been married to the second respondent on 15th August, 2007. On 31.05.2010, the second respondent lodged first information report (FIR) No.88/2010 alleging offences punishable under sections 498-A/4of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) with CAW Cell having been committed against her by the persons against whom the said accusations were made, including the petitioner herein. The investigation was completed and report (charge sheet) under Section 173 of the Code o...
Tag this Judgment!