Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 11 of about 755 results (0.022 seconds)Kabir vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 582/2018 KABIR Judgment reserved on 19th December, 2018 Judgment pronounced on 29th January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Kavita Jha, Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni and Mr.Rajiv Jha, Advocates. STATE Versus ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with Insp. Rajesh Mishra and SI Vishnu Dutt, P.S. New Friends Colony. + STATE CRL.A. 822/2018 MOHD. NOOR JAMAL ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocate. Versus ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with Insp. Rajesh Mishra and SI Vishnu Dutt, P.S. New Friends Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. Vide this common order, we shall dispose of the Crl. Appeal No.582/2018 and Criminal Appeal No.822/2018. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants under Section 374(2) of the Code of CRL. A. Nos. 582/2018 and 822/2018 Page 1 of 16 Criminal Procedur...
Tag this Judgment!National Seeds Corporation Limited vs.international Panaacea Limited
Court: Delhi
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 1.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 399/2017 NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yashvardhan, Ms. Smita Kant, Mr. Pradeep Chhindra, Mr. Abhishek Praharaj and Mr. Parinay Vasandni, Advs versus INTERNATIONAL PANAACEA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumesh Dhawan with Mr. Vatsala Kak, Ms. Ankita Bajpai and Ms. Tulika Bhatnagar, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) to assail the Arbitral award dated 11.07.2017.2. The short issue which arises for consideration in this petition is: as to whether or not the learned Arbitrators interpretation of Clause (i), which is titled as Payment Mode, is perverse.3. The clause in issue reads as follows:-"(i) Payment Mode: As the business is on back to back basis, NSC would make pa...
Tag this Judgment!Asha Verma & Anr. Vs.monika Singla
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.108/2017 * + % ASHA VERMA & ANR. 29th January, 2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Nalin Tripathi and Ms. Chanchal (Mobile No.Sharma, Advocates 9810036122). versus MONIKA SINGLA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gagan Gupta and Mr. Ravish (Mobile No.Bansal, Advocates 9811212776). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.108/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.3619/2017 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendants in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 05.11.2016 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for specific performance filed by the respondent/plaintiff pertaining to the Agreement to Sell dated RFA No.108/2017 Page 1 of 18 26/27.05.2005 for the property being Flat No.37, Second Floor, Cooperative Group Housing Society, Ankur Apartments, I.P. Extension, Plot No.7, Patparga...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Vinod Kumar Gupta vs.roopvilla Cghs Ltd. And Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SH. VINOD KUMAR GUPTA Date of Decision:29. 01.2019 ........ Petitioner $~ * + % W.P.(C) 8992/2018 ROOPVILLA CGHS LTD. AND ORS. Through: Mr. Bhavtosh Sharma with Mr. Versus Yogesh Verma, Advs. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhananjaya Mishra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition to assail the order dated 15.05.2018 passed by the Delhi Co-operative Tribunal in Appeal No.116/2013/DCT against the order dated 30.08.2013 passed by the Special Registrar of Co-operative Societies. By the said order dated 30.08.2013, the Registrar of Co-operative Societies had approved the expulsion of the petitioner and one Sh. Ankit Saxena, who were expelled from the membership of Roopvilla CGHS Ltd. under Rule 99 of the DCS Rules, 1999.2. The Tribunal, by the impugned order, has dismissed the petitioners appeal against the said order passed by the Specia...
Tag this Judgment!Ravi Singhal vs.manali Singhal
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h January, 2019. CM(M) 80/2018 & CM No.2196/2018 (for stay) RAVI SINGHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Mr. Ankit Virmani, Mr. Rinkel Singh, Mr. Krishan Tewary and Ms. Nimisha Narayan, Advs. MANALI SINGHAL Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee, Ms. Meera Menon, Ms. Vinita Sashidharan and Mr. Deepak Singh Rawat, Advs. with respondent-in-person. AND CM(M) 232/2018 * % + + MANALI SINGHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee, Ms. Meera Menon, Ms. Vinita Sashidharan and Mr. Deepak Singh Rawat, Advs. with petitioner-in-person. RAVI SINGHAL Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Mr. Ankit Virmani, Mr. Rinkel Singh, Mr. Krishan Tewary and Ms. Nimisha Narayan, Advs. CM(M) 80/2018 & CM(M) 232/2018 Page 1 of 18 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The husband as well as the wife, being dissatisfied with the order date...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Yadav vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 28, 2019 Decided on: January 29, 2019 BAIL APPN. 511/2018 SANJAY YADAV ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Puneet Mittal, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Richa Singh and Ms.Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with Insp.Ramesh Chandra, DIU, Dwarka Mr.V.K.Shandilya and Mr.Dhruv Sharma, Advocates for complainant Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Mr.Piyush Singh and Mr.Akshay Srivastva, Advocates for the victims CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.653/2014 under Sections 420/467/468/478/120-B IPC registered at PS Chhawla on the complaint of Dharmender Yadav filed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.2. Allegations of Dharmender Yadav who is also an accused now in the FIR in question having been arrested are that the petitioner son o...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Noor Jamal vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 582/2018 KABIR Judgment reserved on 19th December, 2018 Judgment pronounced on 29th January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Kavita Jha, Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni and Mr.Rajiv Jha, Advocates. STATE Versus ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with Insp. Rajesh Mishra and SI Vishnu Dutt, P.S. New Friends Colony. + STATE CRL.A. 822/2018 MOHD. NOOR JAMAL ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocate. Versus ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with Insp. Rajesh Mishra and SI Vishnu Dutt, P.S. New Friends Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. Vide this common order, we shall dispose of the Crl. Appeal No.582/2018 and Criminal Appeal No.822/2018. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants under Section 374(2) of the Code of CRL. A. Nos. 582/2018 and 822/2018 Page 1 of 16 Criminal Procedur...
Tag this Judgment!Jagjit Singh vs.gurmit Singh &Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h January, 2019 I.A.1993/2017, 6915/2017, 6916/2017, $~O-20 * % 1. + CS(OS) 1302/2012 & 1304/2019 JAGJIT SINGH Through : Mr.Harkirat ..... Plaintiff Singh, Mr.Neeraj ..... Defendants Advocates versus GURMIT SINGH &ORS Through : Mr.Rajiv Bakshi, Advocate JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide order dated 03rd May, 2013, this Court passed the preliminary decree of partition whereby the plaintiff and the three defendants were declared as having 1/4th undivided share in property bearing No.90, Engineers Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi-110034 and T-2342, Faiz Road, Karol Bagh, Delhi-110005.2. Para 20 of the order dated 03rd May, 2013 is reproduced hereunder: 20. Accordingly, a preliminary decree for partition of, (i) Built-up House Property No.90, Engineers Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi-34, admeasuring 192 sq. yds. (approximately) Ground Floor built only and (ii) Built-up House Property No.T-2342, Faiz Road, Karol Bagh, Delhi-05, admeasuring 90 sq. yds. (app...
Tag this Judgment!Poonam Talwar vs.m/s Bennet , Coleman & Co Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:29. h January,2019 RFA(OS) 93/2018, C.M.54501-54504/2018 POONAM TALWAR ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Nisha Narayanan, Advocate versus M/S BENNET , COLEMAN & CO LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. 54502/2018 (extension of time for filing court fee) 1. Since, the court fee has been filed by the appellant, the application is rendered infructuous.2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous. C.M.54501/2018 (delay) 3. The present application has been filed by the appellant/applicant seeking condonation of delay of 1093 days in filing the present appeal.4. The necessary facts required to be noticed for disposal of this application are that a suit being CS (OS) 2841/2014 was filed by the respondent herein for recovery of money. The appellant herein is the wife of respondent no.2. The respondent n...
Tag this Judgment!Citigroup Inc. & Ors. Vs.puneet Motwani
Court: Delhi
5 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1112/2018 & I.A. 12345/2018 CITIGROUP INC. & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Karan Bajaj and Versus Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Advocates PUNEET MOTWANI Through None. ..... Defendant Date of Decision:29. hJanuary, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered trademarks, passing off, dilution of trademark and unfair competition. The prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-"A. The Defendant, its directors, officers, employees, agents, distributors, suppliers, affiliates, subsidiaries, franchisees, representatives and assigns be restrained by a permanent injunction from : CS (COMM) 1112/2018 Page 1 of 14 i. ii. Carrying on any business whatsoever under the mark/trading name CITI, CITI WEALTH ADVISORS, CW, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED and CITI with ARC Design or in any other manner whatsoever holding t...
Tag this Judgment!