Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 1 of about 755 results (0.008 seconds)Sunil Kumar vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Tag this Judgment!Trilooki Nath Pandita vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Tag this Judgment!Dr Abdul Sattar vs.jamia Millia Islamia
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d January , 2019 Pronounced on:31. t January, 2019 LPA6332018 & CM No.47473/2018 (stay) DR ABDUL SATTAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate with Ms. Pratishtha Vij and Mr. Baburam, Advocates. JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Zeba Khair, Advocate with Mr. Afzal Shah and Ms. Neelambika Singh, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The Appellant who is working as an Evaluator (Urdu) in the Urdu Correspondence Course, Centre for Distance & Open Learning (CDOL) in Jamia Millia Islamia (Respondent) has challenged the order passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 10550/2018 dismissing his writ petition and thus consequently denying the Appellant's request to continue in service till attainment of 65 years of age. Factual Background 2. The Appellant was appointed to the post of Evaluator, Urdu Correspondence Course, in the pay scale of INR5...
Tag this Judgment!Ved Prakash vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~12, 13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 2750/2018 Judgment delivered on:31. 01.2019 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent % + AJAY CHAKERVERTY versus STATE NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2751/2018 SANJAY CHAKERVERTY versus STATE NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2752/2018 VED PRAKASH versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manisha Parmar and Ms. Siddhi Mittal, Advocates. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Manish Tyagi, PS Gandhi Nagar. Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Advocates for the complainant. BAIL APPLN.2750/2018, BAIL APPLN.2751/2018. BAIL APPLN.2752/2018 Page 1 of 4 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) (for in BAIL APPLN. Crl.M.A.2270/2019 2750/2018; Crl.M.A.2269/2019 in BAIL APPLN. 2751/2018; Crl.M.A.2268/2019 (for impleadment) in BA...
Tag this Judgment!A.k. Singh vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:31. 01.2019 % W.P.(C) 9562/2018 & CM No.37203/2018 A.K. SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Kiran Patra, Mr. Sanjiv Joshi and Mr. Pradeep Tiwari, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC Sharma, and Ms. Nehul Advocate for R1 & R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER3101.2019 VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition to assail the order dated 03.08.2018 passed by the Learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.888/2018. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has rejected the original application of the petitioner. W.P. (C) 9562/2018 Page 1 of 8 2. The petitioner is a Senior Public Prosecutor in Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). He preferred the original application to challenge the order dated 08.02.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Depar...
Tag this Judgment!Ranbir Singh Saini and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Tag this Judgment!Vipin Kr. Gupta vs.sarvesh Mahajan
Court: Delhi
$~33 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t January, 2019 CRL.M.C.507/2019 VIPIN KR. GUPTA Through: Mr. ........ Petitioner Amarjit Singh, Advocate versus SARVESH MAHAJAN ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 2171/2019 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.507/2019 & CRL.M.A. 2170/2019 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC, in short) for setting aside the proceedings arising out of the complaint filed by the respondent titled as Sarvesh Mahajan v. M/s Lotus Floriculture L.L.P. & Ors. pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (NI Act), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (hereinafter, the Trial Court), as well as the orders dated 17.11.2014, 06.05.2017 and 01.06.2018 (impugned orders, in short) passed by the Trial Court. Crl.M.C.507/2019 Page 1 of 11 2. The alleged brief facts, which eme...
Tag this Judgment!B S Martolia vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Tag this Judgment!Tilak Ram vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2018 Decided on:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 1951/2012 + DEV SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus ...Respondents INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates. + RANBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR. W.P.(C) 389/2013 ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Kaushik Rana and Ms. Sakshi Kalia, Advocates for CRPF in W.P.(C) Nos. 1951/2012, 389/2013, 480/2013 and 4859/2013. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C)Nos.11227/2015, 11228/2015 and 11233/2015. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Goyal, Advocates in W.P.(C) No.7204/2015. Mr P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI with Ms Annu Singh and Mr Rajpal Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 1...
Tag this Judgment!Girish Kr. Khanduja vs.anil Malik
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 31, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4446/2017 GIRISH KR KHANDUJA ANIL MALIK Through: Mr. H.N. Pandey, Advocate Versus Through: Counsel (Appearance not given) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 26th August, 2017 rejects petitioners application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. by observing that despite ample opportunity given, petitioner has not filed the application in time and now petitioner cannot be allowed to file the application to fill up the lacuna.... Petitioners counsel submits that due to change of jurisdiction, previous counsel of petitioner could not properly handle the case and so, application under Section 145(2) of Negotiable Instruments, Act, 1881 could not be filed and the complainant has not been cross examined at all and his cross examination is essential for just and proper adjudication of the case. It is submitted by petitioners counsel that defence of...
Tag this Judgment!