Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Zakir Ali vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h March, 2018 Decided on:5. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 1035/2016 ARUN SANGWAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. M.K. Choudhary, Adv. versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with SI R.S. Pandit PS Preet Vihar. CRL.A. 1059/2016 ZAKIR ALI STATE Represented by: Mr. C.M. Khan, Mr. Avinash ..... Appellant versus Sharma, Advs. Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with SI R.S. Pandit PS Preet Vihar. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1070/2016 MOHD. IMRAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. C.M. Khan, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Asma Choudhary, Ms. Sheeba Khan, Mr. Ankur Goel, Mr. Soaib Khan, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1035/2016, 1059/2016 & 1070/2016 Page 1 of 12 Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with SI R.S. Pandit PS Preet Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The present appeals are directed against the judgment dated...
Sakets Fabs Private Limited vs.kranti Automobiles Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~CP-32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:05. 09.2018 + CO.PET. 670/2014 SAKETS FABS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Vikas Goel and Mr.Kunal Dutt, Advs. versus KRANTI AUTOMOBILES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Kumar Sameer, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under Sections 433(e), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent Company. It has been pleaded in the petition that the petitioner is a small scale industrial unit supplying automobile components to the respondent since April 2013. Various purchase orders were placed by the respondent pursuant to which the components were supplied from April 2013 to February 2014. Pursuant to each supply, an invoice was raised by the petitioner which has been duly acknowledged by the respondent. It is pleaded that the petitioner is maintaining books of accounts and as per the respondents account maintained by the ...
Sh. Rajiv Sharma vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 09.2018 CRL.M.C. 4093/2018 SH. RAJIV SHARMA ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondent Mr. Vinod Kumar Khanna, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State with the Investigating Officer. Mr. S.K. Vasisht, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0509.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.130/2000 under Sections 498-A/4IPC, Police Station Vasant Kunj.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner is the husband of respondent No.2. CRL.M.C. 4093/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation held before Mediation Centre, Rohini Court on 09.08.2017. The parties have...
Shama & Ors. Vs.gulsher & Ors. (Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: September 05, 2018 + MAC.APP. 63/2018 SHAMA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Deral & Mr. Shailender Solanki, Advocates Versus GULSHER & ORS. (IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD.) Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 65/2018 1. NAZRUDDIN Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Deral & ..... Appellant Mr. Shailender Solanki, Advocates Versus GULSHER & ORS. (IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals arise out of common impugned Award of 16th September, 2017, vide which claim petitions of legal MAC.APP. 63/2018 MAC.APP. 65/2018 Page 1 of 3 heirs/Claimants of deceased- Nafees and Injured- Nazruddin have been dismissed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) on the ground that the involvement of insured vehicle in the accident in ques...
Mohd. Wahid vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h July, 2018 Decided on:5. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 497/2016 JAVED @ CHIKNA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Mohan,Mr.Abhimanyu Kampani, Mr.M.A.Karthik and Mr.Akshay Kumar, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Kamaljeet Singh, PS Kashmere Gate ..... Respondent CRL.A. 541/2016 AYYUB Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Ms.Pallavi ..... Appellant S.Kansal and Mr.Deepak Pandey, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Kamaljeet Singh, PS Kashmere Gate ..... Respondent CRL.A. 653/2016 SAMSUDDIN @ RAJU ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Ms.Pallavi S.Kansal and Mr.Deepak Pandey, Advocates versus CRL.A. 497/2016, 541/2016, 653/2016 & 785/2016 Page 1 of 15 + STATE Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Kamaljeet Singh, PS Kashmere Gate ..... Respondent CRL.A. 785/2016 MOHD. WAHID ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Ms...
Emami Limited vs.dabur India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) No.209/2018 Date of decision:5. h September, 2018 EMAMI LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Ms. Roohina Dua and Mr. Cheitanya Madan, Advocates. versus DABUR INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms. Mamta Rani Jha, Mr. Manish Mishra and Ms. Akansha Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): CM No.36069/2018 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) (COMM) 209/2018 and CM No.36068/2018 FAO(OS)(COMM) No.209 /2018 Page 1 of 4 Counsel for the respondent/ plaintiff in CS(COMM) No.1074/2018 is present on advance notice.2. With the consent of the parties, we have taken up this intra-Court appeal for hearing and disposal at the admission stage itself.3. The primary grievance raised by the appellant/defendant in CS(COMM) No.1074/2018 ...
Param Preet Singh vs.davender Kumar Relan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:05. h September, 2018 CS(OS) 343/2018 PARAM PREET SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr.J.C. Mahindro and Mr.Shubham Agarwal, Advocates DAVENDER KUMAR RELAN & ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Mukul Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, Mr.Sumit Kumar Mishra, Mr.Raj Kumar and Mr.Aditya, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) I.A. 9256/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. I.A. 9257/2018 (under Section 14 of the Limitation Act) 1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for specific performance of agreement dated 04th October, 2010 against the defendants. Along with suit, the plaintiff has filed I.A. 9257/2018 under Section 14 of the Limitation Act for exclusion of the time spent in pursuing the application under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in CS (OS) 252/2013.2. Relevant facts of this case are as under:2. 1. On 0...
Khem Chand (Now Deceased) Through One of His Lrs vs.diwan Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.737/2018 + % KHEM CHAND (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH ONE OF HIS LRS5h September, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate (M. No.9810139700). Through: versus ........ RESPONDENTS DIWAN SINGH & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.36024/2018(exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Nos. 36025/2018(condonation of delay 36026/2018(condonation of delay in re-filing) in filing) & 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay of 14 days in filing and 80 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.737/2018 Page 1 of 8 RFA No.737/2018 and C.M. No.36023/2018(stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the original defendant in the suit (now deceased and represented through his legal heir as he died during the penden...
Siddhartha Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~47. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9340/2018 & CM No.36148/2018 Date of Decision:5. h September, 2018 SIDDHARTHA SINGH Versus Through:... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Kamaldeep, Mr.Shravan Kumar, Advs. for UOI. Mr.Rishikesh Kumar, ASC with Mr.Premsagar Pal, Adv. for Govt. of NCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO Rajendra Menon, Chief Justice (Oral) JUDGMENT1 This petition in public interest has been filed challenging the Notification No.S.O.1522(E) dated 06.04.2018 issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India increasing the speed limit for plying of motor vehicles from 100 kmph to 120 kmph on National Highways and for motor cycles from 60 kmph to 80 kmph.2. Challenge to the notification increasing the speed limit for plying of motor vehicles and motor cycles on the national highways is made on th...
M/S Anu Impex vs.m/s Sudha Collection
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:5. h September, 2018 CRL.L.P. 578/2018 M/S ANU IMPEX ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.K.S. Arya, Advocate. versus M/S SUDHA COLLECTION .....Respondent Represented by: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.31391/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.A. No.31392/2018 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application delay of 39 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 578/2018 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 23rd January, 2018 whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short the NI Act), the petitioner/complainant through Ms. Chandra Adhikari has preferred the present leave petition.2. The facts leading to the present case are that the respondent is a proprietorship concern and was engaged in the export ...
- ‹ Prev
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- Next ›
- Last »