Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep Khatri and Ors. Vs.oriental Insurance Co Ltd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of decision: September 05, 2018 + MAC.APP. 285/2013 1. SANDEEP KHATRI AND ORS. Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate ..... Appellants Versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Gaur, Advocate for Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 27th November,2012 grants compensation of `11,50,000/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to appellants-Claimants on account of death of one Jyoti, wife of Sandeep, aged 28 years, who was working as Receptionist in Web Net Infotech Computer Institute, in a vehicular accident on 31st March, 2010.2. The factual background of this case, as noticed in the impugned Award, is as under:-"Petitioner No.1 being the husband and petitioner No.2 being the minor daughter of the deceased who was aged about 28 years have filed the present claim petition claiming therein a compensation of Rs.30,00,000/- with interest @ 18% p.a. on the ground...
Mohd. Imran vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h March, 2018 Decided on:5. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 1035/2016 ARUN SANGWAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. M.K. Choudhary, Adv. versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with SI R.S. Pandit PS Preet Vihar. CRL.A. 1059/2016 ZAKIR ALI STATE Represented by: Mr. C.M. Khan, Mr. Avinash ..... Appellant versus Sharma, Advs. Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with SI R.S. Pandit PS Preet Vihar. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1070/2016 MOHD. IMRAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. C.M. Khan, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Asma Choudhary, Ms. Sheeba Khan, Mr. Ankur Goel, Mr. Soaib Khan, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1035/2016, 1059/2016 & 1070/2016 Page 1 of 12 Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with SI R.S. Pandit PS Preet Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The present appeals are directed against the judgment dated...
Fiitjee Ltd. Vs.om Prakash Daral
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FIITJEE LTD. Decided on:5. h September, 2018 CRL.L.P. 640/2016 Represented by: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. ........ Petitioner Advocate with Ms. Shradha Karol and Mr.Sarthak Karol, Advocates. versus OM PRAKASH DARAL ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rakesh Yadav, Ms. Ruchira Arora, Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat and Mr. Rohan Yadav, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Having perused the order sheet of the learned trial court this court deems it fit to grant leave to appeal.2. Leave to appeal petition is disposed of. Crl. A. No./2018 (to be numbered) 1.2. 3.4. Registry to number the appeal. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Aggrieved by the order dated 14th September, 2016 dismissing the complaint of the petitioner for non-prosecution and thereby acquitting the respondent, the petitioner prefers the present appeal.5.... Petitioner filed a complaint under Sections 420/120B/34 IPC against the responde...
The Deputy Secretary vs.m/s Bhayana Builders Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:5. h September, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 192/2018 & CM. APPL346542018(stay) THE DEPUTY SECRETARY ..... Appellant Through Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Vivek Tyagi, Mr. Saurabh Mishra and Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocates versus M/S BHAYANA BUILDERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mrs. Meghna Mishra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Yashvardhan Bandi, Mr. Adit Singh and Ms. Riya, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The objections to the interim Award dated 15.11.2017 passed by the sole arbitrator were rejected by the learned Single Judge of this court by an order dated 09.05.2018, which has led to the filing of the present appeal under Section 37(1)(C) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act.2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the present appe...
Lt Colonel Vineet Mehta vs.the Estate Officer and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h September, 2018. % + W.P.(C) 3573/2017, CM No.2127/2018 (for stay) & CM No.4951/2018 (for direction/recall of order dated 27th April, 2017). LT COLONEL VINEET MEHTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Kumar and Mr. Abishek Sarvaria, Advs. Versus THE ESTATE OFFICER AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Col. A. K. Singh, SO (Legal). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 29th March, 2017 in PPA No.10/2016 of the Court of the Additional District Judge-01 (South-West) acting as Appellate Officer under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act)]. of dismissal of appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated [6th October, 2012 of the respondent no.1 Estate Officer, Delhi Military Station]. of eviction of the petitioner under Section 5 of t...
Oriental Insurance Company vs.meena Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
Versus MEENA DEVI AND ORS. + MAC.APP. 904/2014 MEENA DEVI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: September 05, 2018 + MAC.APP. 338/2013 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Gaur, Advocate for Mr.Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate Versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gaur, Advocate for Mr.Pradeep Gaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals are directed against Award of 21st 1. January, 2013 vide which compensation of `7,02,773/- with interest @ 9% per annum has been awarded to Claimants. In the above captioned first appeal, Oriental Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter referred to MAC.APP. 338/2013 MAC.APP. 904/2014 Page 1 of 6 as Insurer) seeks reduction of quantum of compensation granted, whereas in the above captioned second appeal, enhancement ...
r.k. (Pvt.) Iti, Dist.-Farrukhabad, u.p vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
#75 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:05. 09.2018 W.P.(C) 6968/2018 R.K. (PVT.) ITI, DIST.-FARRUKHABAD, U.P ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Devendra Kumar and Ms. Priti, Advocates For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr. Shravan Kumar Shukla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) by the Appellate Committee 1. In the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the pre-eminent ground on which the impugned order dated 31.05.2018, passed petitioner accreditation/affiliation for the academic session 2018-19, is assailed is that, contrary to the assertion made on behalf of the Appellate Committee of the Directorate General of Training (DGT), to the effect that, the petitioner institution was granted a hearing before passing the same, it is an admitted position that, the ma...
Kirpal Singh vs.m/s Haryana Roadways
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~69 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:5. h September, 2018 LPA5112018 & CM No.36092/2018 (delay) KIRPAL SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.M.K. Bhardwaj and Mr.M.D. Jangra, Advs. versus M/S HARYANA ROADWAYS ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM No.36092/2018 (delay) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 1633 days in filing the appeal.2. Counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal could not be filed within the time allowed as the appellant had sought legal advice from his counsel and it was decided to assail the judgment of the learned Single Judge. It is further submitted that the counsel had initially told him that he would do the needful and inform him that the case has been filed before the Court. Thereafter, he did not take his phone calls and when he visited the office, he learnt that the office had been shifted. It has further...
Bale Ram vs.lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. t August, 2018 Pronounced on:5. h September, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2178/2016 BALE RAM ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Arati Mahajan Shedha and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs. versus % 1. LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Zahid Hanief and Mr. ASC(Civil)-GNCTD Naushad Ahmed Khan, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT Section 20 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the DSE Act) empowers the Administrator (i.e. the Lieutenant Governor) to take over the Management of schools which have been found to be defaulting in performing the duties imposed on them, and sub- section (1), thereof, reads thus: 20. Taking over the management of schools. (1) Whenever the Administrator is satisfied that the managing committee or manager of any school, whether recognised or not, has neglected to perform any of the duties imposed on it by or under this Act or any rule made thereunder and th...
Abhineet Jain & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 09.2018 + W.P.(CRL) 2638/2018 ABHINEET JAIN & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: : : Mr. K.V.S. Gupta & Mr. N.K. Bhambri, Advs. Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Babbar with SI Jasmer Singh Mr. Kapil Kumar, Adv for R-2 For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0509.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.442 of 2017 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Jahangir Puri, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.2 and 4 are the other family members of petitioner No.1. W.P.(CRL) 2638/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes before the Counselling Cell...
- ‹ Prev
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›
- Last »