Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madan Lal vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4382/2016 Decided on:5. h September 2018 MADAN LAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Bachchan Singh, PS Keshav Puram CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is facing criminal prosecution in the case arising out of investigation into first information report (FIR) no.310/2015 under Sections 285 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of police station Keshav Puram. The case involves the death of Nagraj, aged 50 years, who had succumbed to injuries suffered in an incident of fire in house No.4273, Gali no.4, Jai Mata Market, Tri Nagar, Delhi in the evening of 07.05.2015. The case concerns the afore-mentioned offences allegedly committed by the petitioner, he having used the said property as a godown for stocking inflammable material (PVC goods), the fire inc...
Ramandeep Singh Kohli vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
% + CRL.M.C. 2702/2018 RAMANDEEP SINGH KOHLI versus THE STATE & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS $~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:05. 09.2018 Mr. Surender Choudhary, Advocate. Mr. Siddhartha Nanwal, Advocate for respondent No.2 SI Akash, PS Kapashera. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0509.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.9618/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2702/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.462/2014 under CRL.M.C. 2702/2018 Page 1 of 3 Section 392 IPC, Police Station Kapashera.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner is stated to have asked the complainant for his phone for making a phone call. When the phone was handed over, he is alleged to have hit him and run away with the phone.3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties are acquaintance...
Samsuddin @ Raju vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h July, 2018 Decided on:5. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 497/2016 JAVED @ CHIKNA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Mohan,Mr.Abhimanyu Kampani, Mr.M.A.Karthik and Mr.Akshay Kumar, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Kamaljeet Singh, PS Kashmere Gate ..... Respondent CRL.A. 541/2016 AYYUB Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Ms.Pallavi ..... Appellant S.Kansal and Mr.Deepak Pandey, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Kamaljeet Singh, PS Kashmere Gate ..... Respondent CRL.A. 653/2016 SAMSUDDIN @ RAJU ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Ms.Pallavi S.Kansal and Mr.Deepak Pandey, Advocates versus CRL.A. 497/2016, 541/2016, 653/2016 & 785/2016 Page 1 of 15 + STATE Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Kamaljeet Singh, PS Kashmere Gate ..... Respondent CRL.A. 785/2016 MOHD. WAHID ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Ms...
M/S Mist Avenue Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s. Jms Steels & Power Corporation & Ano ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.743/2018 % M/S MIST AVENUE PVT. LTD. 5th September, 2018 .... Appellant Through: Mr. Anil Airi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ravi K. Chandna, Advocate, Ms. Priyanka Nayyar, Advocate, Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advocate and Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate. M/S. JMS STEELS & POWER CORPORATION & ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.36119-20/2018(exemption) 1. C.M. Nos.36118/2018(condonation of delay in filing) 2. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M.s stand disposed of. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay of 256 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.743/2018 Page 1 of 10 RFA No.741/2018 and C.M. No.36117/2018(stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of the Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.1 in the suit impugning the Judgment of th...
Manglam Place Welfare Association (Regd.) vs.north Delhi Municipal Cor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3019/2018 & CM No.12076/2018, 21522/2018, 21596/2018 Date of Decision:5. h September, 2018 MANGLAM PLACE WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.) Through: Ms.Sonia Mr.R.K.Saini, Adv. Versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Sharma, Adv. for ........ RESPONDENTS Pushkarna, Through: Ms.Mini Standing Counsel with Ms.Swagata Bhuyan, Ms.Shiva Pandey, Advs. for North DMC. Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC3GNCTD. Mr.B.L.Wali, Adv. for R-4. ASI Subhash Chand (No.3054/RD) P.S. South Rohini. for R- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO Rajendra Menon, Chief Justice (Oral) JUDGMENT1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and in public interest has been filed inter alia contending that illegal paid parking area in Manglam Place District Centre, Sector-3, Rohini, Delhi has been granted to respondent No.4 contrary to the provisions of law inasmuch as the area earmarked for parki...
Anita Devi & Ors. Vs.rajiv Kumar Tiwari & Ors (The New India Assurance ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 05, 2018 + MAC.APP. 53/2018 SHARMILA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates Mr. Rajiv Kumar Tiwari, respondent No.3 in person + MAC.APP. 171/2018 .....Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate RADHA DEVI & ANR. versus RAJIV KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates Mr. Rajiv Kumar Tiwari, respondent No.3 in person + MAC.APP. 187/2018 ANITA DEVI & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate MAC.APP. 193/2018, 214/2018 & 215/2018 Page 1 of 6 versus RAJIV KUMAR TIWARI & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ) .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates Mr. Rajiv Kumar Tiwari, respondent No.3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (...
Shivam Chauhan & Anr. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~34 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:5. h September 2018 CRL.M.C. 2759/2018 and Crl.M.A.9813-9814/2018 SHIVAM CHAUHAN & ANR. Through: ........ Petitioners Mr. Rakesh Nautiyal, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Narender Singh, PS Vasant Kunj South CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. This petition has been presented invoking inherent power of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) with the prayer that proceedings arising out of first information report (FIR) no.6of police Station Vasant Kunj (South), involving offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) read with Sectionsandof the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the first petitioner and the kalandara (complaint case) alleging offences punishable under Sectionsandof the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Crl. M.C. No.2759/2018 Pa...
Neeta Sarda & Ors vs.aditya Sarda & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h September, 2018. RFA No.461/2016 NEETA SARDA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashok Jain, Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, Mr. Aniket Bhattacharyya and Mr. Arjun Aggarwal, Advs. Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, Adv. Appellant No.3. for versus ADITYA SARDA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shakil Ahmed, Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Mr. Vikas Mehta, Mr. Apoorv Khatar and Ms. Rijuta Mohanty, Advs. for R-1,2&3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order [dated 25th May, 2016 in CS No.3(Case ID No.02406C0458992010) of the Court of the Additional District Judge-05 (South)]. in a suit filed by the four appellants and respondent No.7 against the respondents No.1 to 6/defendants.2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 19th July, 2016 when the counsel for the respondents no.1,2&...
Veer Singh & Ors. Vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
$~41 & 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 09.2018 CRL.M.C. 4477/2018 VEER SINGH & ORS THE STATE & ORS + CRL.M.C. 4478/2018 versus NARESH @ BABLU & ORS THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ORS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. R.C.Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ranvir Singh, P.S.Fatehpur Beri. Mr. Subhash Chand, Adv. for R-2 to 4 in Crl.M.C.4477/2018 & in Crl.M.C.4478/2018. for R-2 to 5 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0509.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.31367/2018 (exemption) Crl.M.A.31369/2018 (exemption) CRL.M.C. 4477/2018 & 4478/2018 Page 1 of 3 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4477/2018 & Crl.M.C.4478/2018 1. The petitioners, in Crl. M.C. 4477/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.5under Section 354/354B/324/341/5IPC Police S...
Javed @ Chikna vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2018
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h July, 2018 Decided on:5. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 497/2016 JAVED @ CHIKNA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Mohan,Mr.Abhimanyu Kampani, Mr.M.A.Karthik and Mr.Akshay Kumar, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Kamaljeet Singh, PS Kashmere Gate ..... Respondent CRL.A. 541/2016 AYYUB Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Ms.Pallavi ..... Appellant S.Kansal and Mr.Deepak Pandey, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Kamaljeet Singh, PS Kashmere Gate ..... Respondent CRL.A. 653/2016 SAMSUDDIN @ RAJU ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Ms.Pallavi S.Kansal and Mr.Deepak Pandey, Advocates versus CRL.A. 497/2016, 541/2016, 653/2016 & 785/2016 Page 1 of 15 + STATE Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Kamaljeet Singh, PS Kashmere Gate ..... Respondent CRL.A. 785/2016 MOHD. WAHID ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Ms...
- ‹ Prev
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- Next ›
- Last »