Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India vs.jagdish (Deceased) Through Lrs & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h September, 2018. LA.APP. 311/2014 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Kushal Raj Tater & Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advs. Versus JAGDISH (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ANR ...Respondents Through: Mr. Madan Lal Sharma, Adv. for R- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW23&5. This appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 1. impugns the judgment and decree [dated 20th September, 2003 in LAC No.673/1989 of the Court of Additional District Judge, Delhi]. on a Reference under Section 18 of the Act, enhancing the compensation with respect to acquired land of the respondents, from Rs.2,600/- per bigha to Rs.67/- per sq. yds.2. The appeal is accompanied with CM No.11210/2014 for condonation of delay of 3818 days in filing thereof.3. The appeal and the application for condonation of delay came up first before this Court on 16th July, 2014 ...
J Khushalani vs.badarpur Thermal Power Station & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~66 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA5442018 Date of Judgment:24. h September, 2018 J KHUSHALANI Through: versus... Petitioner in person. ..... Appellant BADARPUR THERMAL POWER STATION & ANR Through: Ms.Shaheen, proxy counsel for Mr.Puneet Taneja, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.38686/2018 (delay) 1. This is an application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 1185 days in filing the present appeal. The appellant, who appears in person, submits that the delay was not caused on account of carelessness or negligence but on account of the fact that his wife was not keeping good health and is suffering from high blood pressure, neuro problems, osteoarthritis and has now got both her knees replaced. The appellant submits that he himself is also suffering from high blood pressure and neuro problems and on his being pre-occupied looking after his wife has cau...
Deepak Tyagi vs.supreme Court Bar Association Multi-State Co-Operative ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: September 22, 2018 W.P.(C) 9971/2018 & CM388552018 DEEPAK TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shamshad and Mr.K.K. Gautam, Advocates with petitioner in person versus SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION MULTI-STATE CO- OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. (REGD) & ORS. Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Senior Advocate .....Respondents with Ms. Noopur Dubey, Mr. R.K. Rathore and Mr. H.A. Khan, Mr. Shadab Hussain Khan and Ms. Nigar Khan, Advocates No.1 Mr. A.K. De, Advocate/President of respondent No.2-Society Mr. Rakesh Munjal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aditya Pushkar Khanna and Mr. Sanjay Yadav, Advocates for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks a mandamus to first respondent to delete his name from the Email of 26th March, 2018 sent by first respondent to second respondent. The deletion sought is regarding the name of petitioner being shown as Transferee. According to petitioner, he is origina...
Gaon Sabha Nanakheri vs.sucheta Memorial Trust
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O. Ref. No.1/2015 + % GAON SABHA NANAKHERI20h September, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.S. Dalal, Advocate (M. No.9212034938) SUCHETA MEMORIAL TRUST versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dinesh Dahiya, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Original Reference under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is sent by the Deputy Commissioner/Collector (South West) whereby opinion of this Court has been sought as to whether construction of a boundary wall around agricultural land which is governed by the Delhi Land Reforms Act,1954 (hereinafter referred to as DLR Act) and Delhi Land O. R. No.1/2015 Page 1 of 16 Reforms Rules,1954 (hereinafter referred to as DLR Rules) is or is not a prohibited activity under the provision of Section 81 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act or in other words whether the agricultural and relative activities which are...
Shiv Lal Paswan vs.harshit Nagpal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 20, 2018 + MAC.APP. 758/2017 1. SHIV LAL PASWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate Versus HARSHIT NAGPAL & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 1st February, 2017 grants compensation of `3,82,702/- with interest @ 10 % per annum to appellant-Shiv Lal Paswan (hereinafter referred to as Injured), aged 36 years, working as COMI-I with Haldiram Ethnic Food Pvt. Ltd., who had suffered grievous injuries in a vehicular accident, which took place on 19th October, 2013. The facts, as noticed in the impugned Award, are as under:-"Shiv Lal Paswan gave his statement to the police that on 19.10.2013 at 6.40 p.m. he was standing at crossing, near Holiday Inn, where one car bearing No.DL-13C-2946 came in a high speed and in a rash and negligent manner hit against scooty and thereafter hit against him as a result he fell do...
Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd. Vs.cobra Instalaciones Y servicios,s.A
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2018
$-13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h September, 2018 O.M.P. 522/2015 RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anil Seth & Mr.Udit Seth, Advs. versus COBRA INSTALACIONES Y SERVICIOS,S.A ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kamal Mehta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 25.06.2015 passed by the majority of the Arbitral Tribunal.2. The disputes between the parties have arisen in relation to the work of Design, Supply, Erection, Testing & Commissioning of 25 KV, 50 HZ., Single Phase, Traction Over-Head Equipment, Switching Stations, Traction Substation, Feeding Post, Shunt capacitor bank and other associated works for Phase I work between Venkatachalam Road Jn. to Krishnapatnam including works of connecting Venkatachalam Road Jn. to ...
Ishwar Singh & Anr vs.madhubala & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2018
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h September, 2018. EX.F.A. 20/2018 & CM No.22071/2018 (for stay) SANJEEV Through: Mr. Ajay Malhotra ..... Appellant and Mr. Deepankar Kataria, Advs. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS MADHUBALA & ORS EX.F.A. 22/2018 & CM No.22201/2018 (for stay) Through: Mr. Sunil Choudhary, Adv. for R-1. AND SANJEEV Through: Mr. Ajay Malhotra ..... Appellant and Mr. Deepankar Kataria, Advs. Versus HARVINDER SINGH CHEEMA & ORS EX.F.A. 24/2018 & CM No.24160/2018 (for stay) Through: Mr. Sunil Choudhary, Adv. for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS AND ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S. Chaturvedi, Adv. ISHWAR SINGH & ANR MADHUBALA & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Choudhary, Adv. for R-1. These Execution First Appeals under Order XXI Rule 103 of the 1. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugn the common order [dated 26th February, 2018 in Ex. No.50847/2016 & Ex. No.50849/2016 of the Cour...
Tril Roads Private Limited vs.national Highway Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) 10690/2016 % Reserved on:26. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:20. h September, 2018 TRIL ROADS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA... Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Amrita Narayan and Mr.Ishaan Duggal, Advs. Versus Respondent Mr.Keshav Mohan, Mr.Rishi K. and Mr.Piyush Through: Awasthy, Ms.Ritu Arora Choudhary, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.Tril Roads Private Limited ('petitioner' for short) has invoked writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to challenge action of the National Highway Authority of India ('respondent' for short) in forfeiting their bid securities of Rs.10.32 crores under package I and Rs.12.40 crores under package II, in terms of Clauses 2.20.6 and 2.20.7 of the Request for Proposal (collectively 'RFPs' for short) in the following projects: Six laning of Kishangarh to Gula...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.nidhi Bhargava & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 20, 2018 + MAC.APP. 589/2018 & C.M. 25892/2018 NATIONAL INSURNCE CO LTD. Versus ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Advocate NIDHI BHARGAVA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Parminder Singh Goindi, + MAC.APP. 592/2018 & & C.M. 25911/2018 Advocate NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Versus ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Advocate NIDHI BHARGAVA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Parminder Singh Goindi, + MAC.APP. 796/2018 & C.M. 36166/2018 Advocate NIDHI BHARGAVA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Parminder Singh & Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocates Versus JAVED AFTAR & ORS. (NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD.) Through: Mr. Parminder Singh Goindi, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) MAC.APP. 589/2018 MAC.APP. 592/2018 MAC.APP. 796/2018 Page 1 of 8 1. The above captioned three appeals arise out of impugned Award of 20th March, 2018, vide which the Motor ...
Sarkar Daulat Madar Makbuja (Khera Khurd) vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:-20th September, 2018. LA.APP. 178/2018 & CM No.36657/2018 (for stay). SARKAR DAULAT MADAR MAKBUJA (KHERA KHURD) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikram Saini and Ms. Chhaya Sharma, Advs. along with Mr. Parmjit Singh, EE in Irrigation Deptt. Haryana). versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Amicus Curie . Ms. Jyoti Tyagi for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 On 10th September, 2018, when this appeal came up first, the following order was passed:-"3. This appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an order on a Reference under Section 30-31 of the Act is listed subject to office objection as to the court fees paid thereon.4. The appellant has paid court fees of Rs.200/-. According to the Registry, ad-valorem court fees have to be paid.5. The counsel for the appellant had the appeal listed by making endorsement that he wi...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »