Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Snehi vs.neeraj Kumar Tiwari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RAM SNEHI RFA No.803/2018 24th September, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amarveer Singh Bhullar and Mr. Arvind Kr. Chauhan, Advocates 9999118899) (9868214878, versus NEERAJ KUMAR TIWARI Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) ..... Respondent CM No.38828/2018 (delay in filing) & CM No.38829/2018 (delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the applications, delays in filing and re-filing are condoned. CMs stand disposed of. RFA8032018 Page 1 of 8 RFA No.803/2018 & CM No.38827/2018 (stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 26.04.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Order XXXVII CPC by dismissing the leave to defend application filed by the appellant/defendant.2. The facts...
Ajit vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 2215/2018 Judgment delivered on:24.09.2018 AJIT ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Mr.Atul T.N with Mr.Inderdeep Singh, AdvS. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr.Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Satvinder, P.S.Kalkaji. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2409.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.32638/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 2215/2018 & Crl.M.B.1505/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.343/2018 under Sectionsof the IPC registered at Police Station Kalkaji, New Delhi. Allegations in the FIR are that from the office of the Municipal BAIL APPLN.2215/2018 Page 1 of 3 Corporation of Delhi, five biometric machines were stolen.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. He furt...
Yudhvir Singh & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi ) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4863/2018 Judgment delivered on:24. 09.2018 YUDHVIR SINGH & ORS. STATE (NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. H.R. Khan Suhel, Mr. Abhishek Bakshi & Mr. Samar Khan, Advs. For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal,, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Rajeshwar Mr. S.N. Khanna with Ms. Geeta Khanna, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2409.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 32741/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4863/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.424 of 2004 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Dwarka, Sector-23, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord. CRL.M.C. 4863/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Exemption on behalf of petitioner No.1 is sought on the ...
Dhananjay Mahapatra & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:24. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3700/2016 & CRL.M.A. 15476/2016 & 1068/2017 INDU JAIN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. R2 in person. CRL.M.C. 3801/2016 & CRL.M.A. 15911/2016, 1066/2017, 8442/2017 SAMIR JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. R2 in person. + Crl.M.C. 3700/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 15 + CRL.M.C. 817/2017 & CRL.M.A. 3452/2017 DHANANJAY MAHAPATRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Ha...
Sh. Surat Singh (Deceased) Thr. Lrs Smt. Chanderwati & Ors. Vs.delhi D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.806/2018 + % SH. SURAT SINGH (DECEASED) THR. LRS SMT. CHANDERWATI & ORS. 24th September, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. J.C. Mahindro and Mr. Lavish Seth, Advocates (Mobile No.9810138091). versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit (since deceased and now represented through legal heirs) impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 29.05.2018 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration, possession and mesne profits under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. RFA8062018 Page 1 of 30 2. As seen from the heading of the suit, as also para 14 of the plaint, the subject suit was a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, i.e. claiming posses...
State vs.nafisa @ Anisa & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :28. h August, 2018 Judgment delivered on:24. h September, 2018 + CRL.REV. P. 93/2016 STATE ........ Petitioner NAFISA @ ANISA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State For the Respondent : Mr Kapil Singhal, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. State has filed this revision petition impugning order dated 04.03.2015 in FIR No.580/2014 under Sections 302/498A/304B Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short), Police Station Gokul Puri, in so far as the order discharges the respondents of the commission of offence under Sections 498A /304B IPC.2. Respondent No.1 was the mother-in-law of the deceased. Respondent No.2 was the husband of the deceased.3. By the impugned order on charge, trial court has declined to frame charges under Section 498A/304B IPC against either of the two accused, how...
ms.g vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* % + Ms.G Decided on:24. h September, 2018 CRL.L.P. 618/2018 Represented by: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok K. Garg, APP for the State with SI Bhagat Singh, PS Ashok Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.32769/2018 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 537 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 618/2018 1.2. As per the requirement of law, identity of the petitioner is withheld. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 9th January, 2017, whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent No.2 for the offences punishable under Sections 323/354D/509 IPC, the petitioner/ complainant has preferred the present leave petition.3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 16th September 2018 on receipt o...
Anil Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. 09.2018 + BAIL APPLN. 1506/2018 ANIL KUMAR versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr.Sanjiv Sahay, Adv. Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, APP for the State with Insp.Sheelwant Singh, P.S.Mundka. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2409.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.72/2018 under Section 498A/304B of the IPC, P.S. Munirka.2. The allegations in the FIR against the petitioner who is the husband of the deceased is that he used to harass the deceased. The case of the prosecution is inter alia based on an alleged suicide note allegedly recovered from the house of the deceased.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suicide note as well as the recovery of the suicide note is suspect, as the original suicide note is not available and was not found by th...
Jasmeet Singh & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~100 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4882/2018 JASMEET SINGH & ORS. Judgment delivered on:24.09.2018 ........ Petitioners STATE & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Dhruva Bhagat, Advocate with petitioners in person. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for respondents with respondents with person. SI Neeraj, PS Timarpur. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2409.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.32806/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4882/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.753/2014 under Sections 452/323/506/354/354B/34 IPC, Police Station Timarpur.2. Subject FIR emanates out of a transaction with regard to the Crl.M.C.4882/2018 Page 1 of 3 sale of a property. Initially, there was a dispute with regard to the sale transaction, consequent to which, the subject FIR was...
Munna Lal and Ors. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10003/2018 & C.M. Nos.38953-54/2018 MUNNA LAL AND ORS Through: Ms.Meenu Mainee, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Madhulika Agrawal & Mr.J.K. Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2409.2018 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 02.08.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing OA No.3691/2012 filed by them as also by the order dated 16.05.2017 passed by the Tribunal dismissing Review Application No.197/2016 filed by them for seeking review of the order dated 02.08.2016.2. This is the third round of litigation that the petitioners have initiated on the same cause of action. In the year, 2008, the petitioners and some other similarly placed employees of the respondents had filed OA No.700/1998 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench for challenging the seniority list prepared...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »