Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anurabh Das Sharma & Anr vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:24. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3700/2016 & CRL.M.A. 15476/2016 & 1068/2017 INDU JAIN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. R2 in person. CRL.M.C. 3801/2016 & CRL.M.A. 15911/2016, 1066/2017, 8442/2017 SAMIR JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. R2 in person. + Crl.M.C. 3700/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 15 + CRL.M.C. 817/2017 & CRL.M.A. 3452/2017 DHANANJAY MAHAPATRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Ha...
Harjinder Singh vs.state ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4859/2018 Judgment delivered on:24. 09.2018 HARJINDER SINGH ........ Petitioner STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Parmil Yodha and Mr. Nand Lal Yodha, Advs. Mr. Raghuvinder Verma,, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Hawa Singh Mr. Neil Wadia, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2409.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.244 of 2012 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis CRL.M.C. 4859/2018 Page 1 of 3 Hazari Courts, Delhi on 01.05.2018. The parties have already been...
Shri Tarsem Lal Bajaj vs.shri Gulshan Chawla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.253/2017 and C.M. No.17914/2017 (under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC) % SHRI TARSEM LAL BAJAJ24h September, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Narendra Bhandari, Advocate (M. No.9313362890). versus SHRI GULSHAN CHAWLA Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 02.11.2016 by which trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs. 68 lakhs filed by the appellant/plaintiff/buyer against the respondent/defendant/seller. The amount of Rs.68 lakhs which was claimed was on account of the RFA No.253/2017 Page 1 of 4 appellant/plaintiff claiming double the amount of Rs. 34 lakhs paid by the appellant/plaintiff to the respondent/defendant under the Agreement to Sell dated 13.06.2014.2. Cou...
Ranjeet Singh vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RANJEET SINGH RFA No.808/2018 24th September, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. C.S. Bhandari, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Boru, Advocate (M. No.8860346364). versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. ...Respondents Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Nos.39065-66/2018(exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M.s stand disposed of. C.M. No.39067/2018(for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of two days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. RFA No.808 /2018 Page 1 of 13 C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.808/2018 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 19.05.2018 by which trial has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on the ground that the plaint lacks valid c...
Burger King Corporation vs.ranjan Gupta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :24. h August, 2018 Date of decision :24. h September, 2018 BURGER KING CORPORATION CS (COMM) 229/2018 & I.A.13615/2014 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Tusha Malhotra and Ms. Pankhuri Malik, Advocates. RANJAN GUPTA AND ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Shailen Bhatia, Ms. Ekta Nayyar, Ms. Neelam and Ms. Saltanat Vidushi, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A.13615/2014 JUDGMENT1 The Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking injunction restraining the use of the mark Burger King by the Defendants for their restaurants in Varanasi. It is the Plaintiffs case that it was founded in 1954 when the first restaurant under the name Burger King was opened in Miami, Florida and the first advertisement was aired in 1958. The Plaintiff states that it owned and operated 275 Burger King Restaurants by the year 1967. Currently, it has more than 13,000 fast food restaurants in around 91 c...
Vidya Devi vs.state (Govt. Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h September, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 545/2018 VIDYA DEVI ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.A.K.Padhy, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT.NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr.Jamal Akhtar and Mr.Chaitanya Gosain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition, the petitioner who is the mother of the deceased Deepak prays for a de-novo/re-investigation by another agency except the local police in case FIR No.236/2016 under Sections 302/452/341/3IPC read with Section 120-B IPC registered at PS Khyala. The petitioner also prays for conducting a DNA test of the two children of Radha namely Naina and Harsh to detect the actual parentage.2. From the narration of facts which would be hereinafter adverted to it will be seen that the second prayer as noted above has no relevance to the facts of the present petition and cannot be granted in the present p...
Piyush Pincha & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4867/2018 Judgment delivered on:24. 09.2018 PIYUSH PINCHA & ORS STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Bahar U. Barqi, Adv. Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sunil Kumar Mr. Ajay Jain and Ms. Aastha Chopa, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2409.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.258 of 2015 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station South Rohini, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement on19.04.2018. The parties have already been CRL.M.C. 4867/2018 Page 1 of 3 divorced by way of a decree of divorce, passed on 20.08.2018.3. As per the settlement, a ...
Lalta Prasad vs.jeevan Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA1212017, CM No.14990/2017 (for stay) & CM No.39156/2018 (of the appellant for restoration of the appeal). LALTA PRASAD Through: Mr. Rashid Hussain, Adv. ..... Appellant versus Through: None. JEEVAN LAL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2409.2018 ..... Respondent $~41. * + 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 24th December, 2016 in RCA No.13/2016 (ID No.DLSE-01-000398-2014) of the Court of Additional District Judge-06 (South-East)]. partly allowing the First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the respondent against the judgment and decree [dated 26th April, 2014 in Civil Suit No.580/2014 (Case ID No.02406C0272112011) of the Court of Civil Judge-01 (South)]. of dismissal of suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of possession of shop bearing No.9, Block A, Kalkaji Mandir, New Delhi and for rendition of account...
Food Inspector vs.b.b. Garg & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h September, 2018 CRL.L.P. 534/2015 FOOD INSPECTOR ........ Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP versus for the State B.B. GARG & ORS. Represented by: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) for UOI/respondents.1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 11th May 2010 whereby the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondents for the offences punishable under Sectionsof the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (in short PFA Act), State has preferred the present leave to appeal petition.2. Brief facts of the case as stated in the complaint are that on 6th August 2003 at about 4:45 A.M. R.K. Bhaskar purchased a sample of Pasturized Double Toned Milk for analysis from respondent No.1 from M/s Delhi Milk Scheme, Shadi Pur, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi, where the said food article was stored for sale and respondent No.1 was fou...
Balraj Arora vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:24. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3700/2016 & CRL.M.A. 15476/2016 & 1068/2017 INDU JAIN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. R2 in person. CRL.M.C. 3801/2016 & CRL.M.A. 15911/2016, 1066/2017, 8442/2017 SAMIR JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. R2 in person. + Crl.M.C. 3700/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 15 + CRL.M.C. 817/2017 & CRL.M.A. 3452/2017 DHANANJAY MAHAPATRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Ha...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »