Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mehdi Hasan vs.government of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5570/2015 MEHDI HASAN Date of Order: September 24, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Ms. Aakansha Nehra & Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Advocates Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Deepika, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 19th February, 2015, rejects petitioners 1. application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of land acquired on the ground that purchase of the acquired land was made by petitioner within five years of issuance of Notification for acquisition of subject land under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.2. The challenge to the impugned order is on the ground that the acquired land was purchased on 25th November, 1994 and the Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was apparently published in daily newspapers much after the said Notification was published in official gazette on 27th October, 1999 and so,...
Ranbir Singh & Ors vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~49 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:24. h September, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7144/2015 RANBIR SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ANR CORAM: Through Mr. Rajeev Verma, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajesh Gogher, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Advocate for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land of the petitioners comprised in Khasra nos.91 (06-08), 9(01-03), 9(02-08), 118 (04-16), 12(01- 04), 123 (04-16), 124 (05-06), 125 (04-16), 12(02-08), 12(02- 08), 130 (04-16), 131 (00-14), 132 (03-09), 133 (02-13), 134 (04-16), 13(02-10), 136 (4-16), 13(02-10), 13(02-16), 16(03- 16), 163 (04-04), 164 (04-00), 165 (04-16), 166 (04-16), 201 (04-16), 203 (04-16), 204 (01-18),...
Samir Jain vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:24. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3700/2016 & CRL.M.A. 15476/2016 & 1068/2017 INDU JAIN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. R2 in person. CRL.M.C. 3801/2016 & CRL.M.A. 15911/2016, 1066/2017, 8442/2017 SAMIR JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. R2 in person. + Crl.M.C. 3700/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 15 + CRL.M.C. 817/2017 & CRL.M.A. 3452/2017 DHANANJAY MAHAPATRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Ha...
Hari Kishen Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:13. h September, 2018 Judgment delivered on:24. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 692/2014 HARI KISHEN SHARMA STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Advocate. with Mr. Shyam Dev Lal & Ms. Drishti Rathore, Advocates. Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sapan Dr. (Maj) J.C. Vashista and Ms. Yashika Sood, Advs. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICESANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.41/2013 under Sectionsof the IPC, Police Station Paschim Vihar and also impugns charges framed against the petitioner on 18.11.2013 under Section 506(1) and 509 IPC.2. Subject FIR was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 that she is a teacher and the principal of the College who is also the brother of her father-in-law usually talked dirty with her on accou...
Krishna vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. 09.2018 + BAIL APPLN. 1169/2018 KRISHNA versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Sanjiv Sahay, Adv. For the Respondent: Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for the State with Insp.Sheelwant Singh, P.S.Mundka. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2409.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.72/2018 under Section 498A/304B of the IPC, P.S. Munirka.2. The allegation in the FIR against the petitioner, who is the mother-in-law of the deceased, is that she used to harass the deceased. The case of the prosecution is inter alia based on an alleged suicide note allegedly recovered from the house of the deceased.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suicide note BAIL APPLN. 1169/2018 Page 1 of 3 as well as the recovery of the suicide note is suspect, as the original suicide n...
Vijay Kumar Gupta & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~99 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 09.2018 CRL.M.C. 4881/2018 VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Alok B. with Mr. Uday Singh, Advocates. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. Mr. Rishi Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. SI Sunil Kumar, PS Govind Puri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2409.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.168/2017 under Sections 323/324/3IPC, Police Station Govind Puri, based on a settlement.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for an exemption for personal appearance of petitioner No.3 on the ground that he has suffered a fracture.... Petitioner No.3 has filed an affidavit in support of the petition. Crl.M.C.4881/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. In view of the above, the petitioner No.3 is granted exempti...
Natalya Mamrenko vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~77 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10015/2018 NATALYA MAMRENKO ........ Petitioner Through Mr Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Jaspreet Singh, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER2409.2018 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J C.M. No.39014/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.1. 2. W.P.(C) 10015/2018 3. notice. The petition is taken up for final hearing.4. under:-"Issue notice. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent accepts The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as (i) Direct the respondents to issue OCI card to the petitioner in lieu of her (PIO) Persons of Indian Origin Card No.P-0563644 which is valid upto 21.11.2026. 5. to Mr Krishan Mohan Lal Nayyar. She claims that The petitioner is a citizen of Uzbekistan and claims that she is married the marriage was W.P.(C) 10015/2018 Page 1 of 4 solemnised at Arya Samaj Mandir...
Subhash Chand vs.state of Nct Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h September, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10054/2018 SUBHASH CHAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kamal Kant Jha, Mr.Krishna Kumar, Mr.P. Mathur and Mr.Siddharth Jha, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Ms.Palak Rohmetra, Adv. for R1-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. This writ petition assails the memorandum dated 12th September, 2018, issued to the petitioner by the Secretary, Legislative Assembly, NCT of Delhi in his capacity as disciplinary authority of the petitioner. This memorandum reads thus: MEMORANDUM WHEREAS Shri Subhash Chandra, Junior Assistant (Grade IV DASS) has been convicted on a criminal charge by the Honble Court of Shri AS Yadav, Spl Judge on 06.07.2010 u/s 7 and 13(1)(d) punishable u/s 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years...
Kiranjot Singh vs.directorate of Education and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:24. h September, 2018 LPA5062018 & CM Nos.35782-35783/2018 KIRANJOT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Naveen R. Nath, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ankur Chhiber with Mr.Bhanu Gupta, Advocates for R-1/Director of Education.Mr.Rupendra Pratap Singh with Ms.Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM No.35783/2018 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM No.35782/2018 (delay) and LPA5062018 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the present appeal.2. Mr.Nath, counsel for the appellant submits that the delay was on account of bonafide reason and not on account of carelessness or inaction on part of the appellant. LPA5062018 Page 1 of 6 3. This application is opposed by counsel for ...
Mohit Khurana vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h August, 2018 Pronounced on:24. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 4327/2018 and Crl. M.A. 30773-30774/2018 MOHIT KHURANA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER The petitioner is facing criminal prosecution on the basis of report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) submitted on conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) no.137/2017 under Sections 279 and 338 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of police station Inder Puri at the instance of the third respondent. He has approached this court invoking the inherent power under Section 482 Cr. PC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India to seek quashing of the proceedings in the said case (Crl. Case no.14335/17) on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled w...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »